PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 485

MOTION to Vacate #484 Judgment Motion to Vacate March 11, 2010 Judgment and Enter Proposed Amended Final Judgment by Google Inc., PA Advisors, LLC, Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Amended Final Judgment)(Perlson, David)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PA ADVISORS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-480-RRR JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT ENTERED ON MARCH 11, 2010 AND ENTER AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT DISPOSING OF ALL REMAINING CLAIMS Plaintiff PA Advisors, LLC, now known as nXn Tech, LLC ("nXn") and Defendants Google Inc. ("Google") and Yahoo! Inc. ("Yahoo") move the Court to enter the attached proposed Amended Final Judgment in connection with (i) the Court's March 3, 2010 order reflecting its intent to grant summary judgment; (ii) the Court's order that the parties submit a joint written statement of remaining issues1; and (iii) the Court's detailed summary judgment order and judgment of March 11, 2010 by which the Court granted a summary judgment of noninfringement for Defendants.2 On the same date that the Court entered its detailed summary judgment order, the Court also signed a Judgment regarding the summary judgment order, which was then entered on the 1 The parties file this motion and proposed Amended Judgment pursuant to the Joint Written Statement (Dkt. No. 482), in which the parties identified remaining issues to be addressed by a final judgment, and represented that an amended judgment would be submitted "within 3 court days of the Court's detailed summary judgment order." Dkt. No. 482. 2 By filing this motion and submitting the proposed new judgment, Plaintiff nXn Tech, LLC ("nXn"), formerly known as PA Advisors, LLC, does not agree that judgment should be entered against it. nXn waives none of its rights to complain of all adverse rulings and the final judgment against it docket. Dkt. No. 484 ("March 11, 2010 Judgment"). The March 11, 2010 Judgment, however, does not address the remaining claims and issues identified by the parties' Joint Statement.3. Accordingly, the parties request that the Court enter the proposed Amended Final Judgment included with this motion. 3 See Nystrom v TREX Co., 339 F.3d 1347, 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (noting a procedure of dismissing counterclaims with prejudice for final judgment after summary judgment of noninfringement granted). Respectfully submitted, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP By /s/ David A. Perlson _____________________________ William C. Rooklidge Email: rooklidgew@howrey.com State Bar No. 134483 Howrey, LLP 4 Park Plaza, Suite 1700 Irvine CA 92614-2559 Telephone: (949) 721-6900 Jason C. White Email: whitej@howrey.com State Bar No. 6238352 Howrey, LLP 321 N. Clark Street, Suite 3400 Chicago IL 60654 Telephone: (312) 595-1239 Brian A.E. Smith Email: smithbrian@howrey.com State Bar No. 188147 Howrey LLP 525 Market Street, Suite 3600 San Francisco CA 94105-2708 Telephone: (415) 848-4900 Jennifer Doan Email: jdoan@haltondoan.com State Bar No. 08809050 Joshua Reed Thane Email: jthane@haltondoan.com State Bar No. 24060713 John Scott Andrews Email: sandrews@haltondoan.com State Bar No. 24064823 Halton & Doan Crown Executive Center, Suite 100 6500 Summerhill Road Texarkana TX 75503 Telephone: (903) 255-10002 Counsel for Yahoo! Inc. David A. Perlson Email: davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com State Bar No. 209502 Charles K. Verhoeven Email: charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com State Bar No. 170151 Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP 50 California St. San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Brian C. Cannon Email: briancannon@quinnemanuel.com State Bar No. 193071 Andrea Pallios Roberts Email: andreaproberts@quinnemanuel.com State Bar No. 228128 Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Dr. Ste. 560 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Harry L. Gillam, Jr. State Bar No. 07921800 Email: gil@gillamsmithlaw.com Melissa R. Smith State Bar No. 24001351 Email: melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com Gillam & Smith, L.L.P. 303 South Washington Avenue Marshall, TX 75670 Telephone: (903) 934-8450 Counsel for Google Inc. By: /s/ Andrew W. Spangler SPANGLER LAW P.C. 208 N. Green Street, Suite 300 Longview, Texas 75601 (903) 753-9300 (903) 553-0403 (fax) spangler@spanglerlawpc.com David M. Pridham LAW OFFICE OF DAVID PRIDHAM 25 Linden Road Barrington, Rhode Island 02806 (401) 633-7247 (401) 633-7247 (fax) david@pridhamiplaw.com John M. Bustamante Texas Bar No. 24040618 BUSTAMANTE, P.C. 54 Rainey Street, No. 721 Austin, Texas 78701 Tel. 512.940.3753 Fax. 512.551.3773 Email:jmb@BustamanteLegal.com Kip Glasscock Texas State Bar No. 08011000 KIP GLASSCOCK P.C. 550 Fannin, Suite 1350 Beaumont, TX 77701 Tel: (409) 833-8822 Fax: (409) 838-4666 Email: kipglasscock@hotmail.com Elizabeth A. Wiley Texas State Bar No. 00788666 THE WILEY FIRM PC P.O. Box. 303280 Austin, Texas 78703-3280 Telephone: (512) 560.3480 Facsimile: (512) 551.0028 Email: lizwiley@wileyfirmpc.com Marc A. Fenster CA Bar No. 181067 LEAD COUNSEL mfenster@raklaw.com Andrew Weiss CA Bar No. 232974 aweiss@raklaw.com Adam Hoffman CA Bar No. 218740 ahoffman@raklaw.com RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 (fax) Patrick R. Anderson PATRICK R. ANDERSON PLLC 4225 Miller Rd, Bldg. B-9, Suite 358 Flint, MI 48507 (810) 275-0751 (248) 928-9239 (fax) patrick@prapllc.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served today with a copy of this document via the Court's ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3), as well as by electronic mail. Any other counsel of record will be served via electronic mail, facsimile transmission and/or first class mail on today's date. By /s/ David A. Perlson David A. Perlson

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?