Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Google Inc
Filing
123
RESPONSE in Opposition re 117 MOTION to Strike Defendant Google Inc.'s Deficient Obviousness Disclosure Under Patent Rule 3-3(B) filed by Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Lance Yang, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Text of Proposed Order)(Perlson, David)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
AND NETSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE INC.
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00893-RG
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DECLARATION OF LANCE YANG IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.’S RESPONSE IN
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE GOOGLE INC.’S
OBVIOUSNESS DISCLOSURE UNDER PATENT RULE 3-3(B)
I, Lance Yang, declare as follows:
1.
I am an attorney at the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,
counsel for Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) in this matter. I have personal knowledge of the
facts stated herein and if called to testify could and would competently testify thereto.
2.
Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an email correspondence
between from Andrea Pallios Roberts of Quinn Emanuel to John Lahad of Susman Godfrey,
including emails dated April 14 and 18, 2014.
3.
Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an email from Lance Yang of
Quinn Emanuel to John Lahad , dated June 3, 2014.
4.
Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of a letter from Andrea Pallios
Roberts to Justin Nelson of Susman Godfrey and John Lahad, dated June 23, 2014.
5.
Attached as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of a letter from John Lahad to
Andrea Pallios Roberts, dated June 25, 2014.
6.
Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of a letter from Lance Yang to
John Lahad, dated June 30, 2014.
7.
Attached as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of an email correspondence
between Lance Yang and John Lahad, including emails dated July 18, 21, and 22, 2014.
8.
Attached as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of an excerpt of Exhibit B to
Google’s May 23, 2014 Invalidity Contentions.
9.
Attached as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of Exhibit A-1 to Google’s May
23, 2014 Invalidity Contentions.
10.
Attached as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of an email from John Lahad to
Andrea Pallios Roberts, dated June 13, 2014..
1
11.
Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of Google’s May 23, 2014 Invalidity
Contentions.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed August 11, 2014 in Los Angeles, California.
___________________________________________
Lance Yang
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?