Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Google Inc

Filing 123

RESPONSE in Opposition re 117 MOTION to Strike Defendant Google Inc.'s Deficient Obviousness Disclosure Under Patent Rule 3-3(B) filed by Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Lance Yang, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Text of Proposed Order)(Perlson, David)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
AND NETSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE INC.
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00893-RG
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE GOOGLE
INC.’S OBVIOUSNESS DISCLOSURE UNDER PATENT RULE 3-3(B)

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion To Strike Google Inc.’s Obviousness Disclosure
Under Patent Rule 3-3(b) (Dkt. No. 117). The Court, having reviewed the motion, Google’s
response, and the other relevant papers in this action, finds that the motion should be denied.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Google’s Obviousness
Disclosure be DENIED.

1