Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 620

NOTICE by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC re #578 Proposed Pretrial Order, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E, #2 Exhibit F, #3 Exhibit M)(Cawley, Douglas)

Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Doc. 620 Att. 1

Exhibit E

Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CITIWARE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., MYSPACE INC., AMAZON.COM INC., PAYPAL INC., MATCH.COM, INC., AOL INC., AND CME GROUP INC., Defendants.

§ § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §

CASE NO. 6:09-cv-269-LED Jury Trial Demanded

PLAINTIFF BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO GOOGLE INC.'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

Plaintiff Bedrock Computer Technologies LLC ("Bedrock"), pursuant to the Court's Docket Control Order and Orders amending Docket Control Order entered in this case, provides this list of objections to Google's depositions designations. Bedrock expressly reserves the right to supplement, augment, or otherwise modify the exchanged designations based on circumstances as they may evolve prior to the commencement of trial. Bedrock's objections to Google's deposition designations are made in reliance on the Defendants' trial witness lists and the labeling of those witnesses as will call. At this time, Bedrock objects to Google's deposition designations testimony as follows:

Dallas 320324v1

Deposition of Joseph D'Avanzo - December 7, 2010
From (page:line) 7:17 8:6 10:22 14:2 14:15 14:23 31:6 34:4 36:2 37:18 38:12 39:17 40:1 40:10 41:17 41:25 43:2 43:9 44:14 46:19 47:13 49:22 52:5 53:15 53:22 54:20 57:15 58:16 60:1 60:25 76:17 77:17 78:23 78:25 79:6 81:5 83:10 83:18 84:7 To (page:line) 7:18 8:11 11:2 14:7 14:17 14:25 31:13 34:9 37:6 37:22 39:12 39:20 40:6 40:18 41:19 42:14 43:5 43:9 45:4 47:5 48:2 50:18 53:13 53:20 53:22 55:19 58:1 58:25 60:12 64:1 77:15 78:21 78:23 78:25 80:6 82:12 83:16 84:5 84:10 Objections

L 403/Legal Issue 38:13-39:12 ­ MIL, 403, Legal Issue 403, Legal Issue

53:9-13 ­ L, AR L, AR L, AR

58:16-20 ­ L 60:9-12 ­ 701, L 60:25-61:4 ­ L L 77:17, 78:1-4 ­ L

79:6-12 ­ L, AR; 79:13-80:6 ­ L, F, AR A 83:18 ­ A; 83:19-21 ­ AR

Dallas 320324v1

Deposition of Joseph D'Avanzo - December 7, 2010
From (page:line) 84:23 85:4 85:17 86:8 86:17 86:23 87:2 87:6 87:11 90:2 91:1 91:21 92:11 93:4 100:6 100:22 101:16 101:22 103:1 103:18 105:7 106:15 107:4 108:3 109:15 111:19 112:16 113:1 113:8 113:18 116:21 To (page:line) 85:2 85:4 86:6 86:15 86:17 86:25 87:4 87:6 88:8 90:21 91:4 92:6 92:19 93:18 100:20 101:7 101:18 102:10 103:6 104:5 106:4 106:17 107:19 108:10 109:23 111:23 112:24 113:6 113:116 113:18 119:8 Objections

L, AR, F, 403 L, AR, F, 403 L, AR, F, 403 F

100:15-20 ­ AR, 403 100:22-3 ­ AR, 403

F, 801 F, 403, 801 AR, L AR, L 113:10-13 ­ AR, L 116:21-25, 117:16-19 ­ AR, L; 117:1-15, 118:8-13, 119:1-3 ­ F, A, 403; 117:2025 ­ A; 118:1-7 ­ CQ; 118:14-25 ­ L, A; 119:4-8 ­ CQ, L, AR 119:10-23 ­ CQ, L, AR; 120:3-5 ­ F, L, AR 120:7 ­ F, L. AR

119:10 120:7 121:8 122:5 124:7 124:22

120:5 120:18 121:20 123:12 124:20 124:24

124:17-20 ­ 602, F, L AR, F, 602, L

Dallas 320324v1

Deposition of Joseph D'Avanzo - December 7, 2010
From (page:line) 125:1 125:7 125:9 To (page:line) 125:5 125:7 125:9 Objections 125:1 ­ AR, F, 602, L; 125:2-5 ­ CQ, 602, F, L CQ, 602, F, L CQ, 602, F, L

Deposition of David Garrod - December 15, 2010
From (page:line) 6:16 7:18 9:18 11:6 12:10 19:23 23:9 27:2 27:23 28:21 29:13 29:24 31:5 55:13 56:4 57:17 57:21 57:25 69:20 69:25 72:25 76:4 76:7 76:11 78:3 78:7 78:11 126:1 126:6 133:12 135:13 136:24 137:19 147:7 To (page:line) 6:19 7:19 9:22 11:13 12:15 20:11 23:21 27:21 27:25 28:25 29:17 30:7 32:10 55:22 56:8 57:19 57:23 59:1 69:22 71:5 73:24 76:5 76:9 76:18 78:5 78:9 78:16 126:4 126:9 133:16 136:5 137:10 138:6 147:9 Objections

MIL E MIL E MIL E

MIL C, 403

Dallas 320324v1

Deposition of David Garrod - December 15, 2010
From (page:line) 147:11 147:13 147:20 147:25 155:1 161:7 161:14 197:18 197:24 198:6 207:15 208:8 208:12 208:23 209:22 210:1 220:15 222:4 223:5 239:1 286:13 287:10 292:3 292:23 293:4 293:11 294:7 299:3 303:21 305:9 307:1 308:11 311:5 314:15 314:23 316:11 317:6 318:23 321:23 322:20 325:23 343:24 345:7 To (page:line) 147:11 147:18 147:23 148:4 155:16 161:9 162:20 197:19 197:24 198:23 207:23 208:10 208:21 209:2 209:24 210:2 222:2 223:3 223:7 239:7 286:25 288:12 292:21 292:24 293:9 293:22 294:10 299:12 304:14 305:25 307:16 309:15 314:13 314:15 315:25 316:19 317:9 319:19 322:19 325:11 326:5 345:5 345:7 Objections

155:11-16 - 403

701

403 403

Dallas 320324v1

Deposition of David Garrod - December 15, 2010
From (page:line) 345:9 346:4 346:7 346:12 346:18 347:1 347:15 348:9 To (page:line) 346:2 346:5 346:10 346:16 346:19 347:13 348:3 348:10 Objections 403 403 403 403 403 403 403 403

Deposition of David Garrod - December 16, 2010
From (page:line) 366:21 371:10 372:5 375:23 379:23 430:18 431:1 433:11 455:23 456:25 458:15 458:17 458:24 459:1 472:6 472:23 480:1 490:21 499:1 501:25 502:12 519:21 521:14 526:8 526:16 527:7 527:13 528:14 534:16 540:3 To (page:line) 367:4 371:19 373:23 376:18 380:19 430:25 432:18 433:22 456:16 458:13 458:15 458:22 458:24 459:17 472:14 473:7 480:3 491:14 501:3 502:10 503:23 520:12 526:6 526:14 527:5 527:11 528:12 529:8 535:10 540:5 Objections 106, F, IQ, MC IQ, IA, MIL D, 403, 402 MIL D, 402, 403, BER 403, 402, CS, IE, MIL D MIL D, 403, 402 MIL D, 403, 402 MIL D, 403, 402 MIL D, 403, 402 403, 402

402, 403 402, 403 IQ, MIL, B, E 701 701 701 403, MC 403, MC 403, MC 403, MC 403, MC 403, MC MIL D

Dallas 320324v1

Deposition of David Garrod - December 16, 2010
From (page:line) 544:1 545:14 548:25 552:6 554:24 556:18 562:19 563:8 571:16 572:24 574:4 608:5 608:9 609:2 To (page:line) 545:12 545:15 549:8 552:16 555:16 556:23 562:22 563:24 572:12 573:11 575:2 608:5 608:20 609:20 Objections 403, MIL D 403, MIL D MIL D, 403 MIL D, 403 MIL D 403, MIL G, MC, IA

MIL D, 403 MIL D, 403 MIL D, 403

Deposition of Mikhail Lotvin - June 4, 2010
From (page:line) 7:25 47:14 50:15 69:7 70:4 70:22 71:11 74:22 75:14 126:1 128:5 129:12 130:13 130:20 130:24 131:1 136:6 136:12 137:3 142:1 158:2 158:7 167:11 To (page:line) 8:2 47:18 50:24 69:11 70:5 71:6 71:11 75:8 75:20 126-18 128:10 130:8 130:16 130:21 130:25 131:8 136:10 137:1 137:7 142:10 158:5 158:7 167:13 Objections

INC INC

129:20-21 - Atty

A/C

Dallas 320324v1

Deposition of Mikhail Lotvin - June 4, 2010
From (page:line) 167:15 170:16 172:20 174:7 203:22 206:24 208:17 209:24 210:17 230:13 To (page:line) 167:20 171:6 172:25 174:13 204:16 208:2 209:18 210:15 211:9 230:19 Objections A/C

INC

Deposition of Mikhail Lotvin - December 28, 2010
From (page:line) 5:18 8:9 20:3 24:14 24:19 25:21 25:25 26:12 36:20 37:1 38:13 38:23 39:2 44:13 46:10 47:15 52:7 53:18 54:19 55:12 57:17 67:17 70:5 71:20 72:3 78:15 79:11 82:10
Dallas 320324v1

To (page:line) 7:15 8:11 20:9 24:17 24:22 25:23 26:8 26:13 36:24 38:11 38:18 38:25 39:9 44:21 46:24 50:5 52:9 53:25 54:24 57:10 58:7 70:3 71:2 71:24 73:5 78:21 79:14 83:4

Objections

402, 403, MIL C 402, 403, MIL C 402, 403, MIL C 402, 403, MIL C 25:25-26:6 - 402, 403, MIL C 402, 403, MIL C 402, 403, MIL C 402, 403, MIL C 402, 403, MIL C 402, 403, MIL C 402, 403, MIL C 46:15-16 - 402, 403 49:7-50:5 - 402, 403, MIL C

402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403

Deposition of Mikhail Lotvin - December 28, 2010
From (page:line) 83:17 84:7 85:5 87:1 92:24 94:17 95:17 96:20 98:18 120:23 121:23 128:24 184:16 194:14 195:3 205:1 206:2 206:14 206:20 207:18 216:8 218:4 218:9 218:18 219:1 221:14 221:18 222:9 225:22 229:4 229:13 231:13 To (page:line) 83:25 84:10 85:23 87:3 94:15 95:8 95:22 96:25 99:3 121:11 122:10 129:1 185:15 194:24 195:15 205:25 206:4 206:16 207:7 208:1 216:14 218:5 218:16 218:24 219:14 221:16 221:23 223:5 226:7 229:7 229:16 232:6 Objections

MIL E, 402, 403, LC MIL E, 402, 403 MIL E, 402, 403 MIL E, 402, 403

MIL E, 402, 403 MIL E, 402, 403 MIL E, 402, 403 403 403 403 403

402, 403 403 403 403 231:25-232:6 - 403

Deposition of Daniel McDonald - January 10, 2011
From (page:line) 7:21 9:2 11:13 12:2 16:20 21:23 To (page:line) 8:3 11:9 11:21 16:18 16:21 22:5 Objections

15:20-22 ­ 602, E 16:16-18, 20-21 ­ 602, E

Dallas 320324v1

Deposition of Daniel McDonald - January 10, 2011
From (page:line) 25:16 28:6 29:10 29:21 30:10 31:1 31:20 32:13 32:19 32:24 33:20 34:13 34:24 35:4 35:10 36:23 36:24 37:10 38:4 40:1 40:8 42:11 42:14 46:20 48:14 48:20 49:17 50:2 51:8 54:1 57:2 57:7 57:17 57:21 58:11 61:1 61:10 61:12 To (page:line) 28:3 28:23 29:15 30:6 30:24 31:17 32:11 32:15 32:21 33:2 34:11 34:22 35:2 35:8 35:16 36:21 37:5 38:1 39:23 40:4 42:9 42:12 46:7 48:3 48:18 49:12 49:24 51:4 53:20 56:24 57:5 57:14 57:19 58:8 58:11 61:7 61:10 61:24 Objections

29:14-15 ­ 602 29:21-23 ­ 602; 30:6 ­ INC 39:10-11 ­ INC 32:5, 11 ­ INC 32:14-15 ­ 602, INC 32:19-20 ­ 602, INC 32:24 ­ 602, INC 34:20-12 ­ 602 35:2 ­ 602 35:4-6 ­ 602 36:19-21 ­ 602, INC 36:24, 37:1-2 ­ 602, INC

41:3-14, 16-19 ­ AR, F, AF; 42:6-9 ­ L L, CS 42:14 ­ L, CS; 42:15-18, 44:10-14, 45:24-46:7 ­ 602

49:20-49:24 ­ CS 50:2-17 ­ CS; 50:18-20 ­ 602, F 54:14-18 ­ 602, F; 56:15-18 ­ AR, L; 56:19-24 ­ CS 57:2-3 ­ CS; 57:4-5 ­ CS, F 57:13-14 ­ L, INC 57:18-19 ­ 701, E 57:21, 57:24-58:5 ­ 701, E; 58:6-8 ­ 701, E, L 701, E, L

61:14-23 ­ CS, F

Dallas 320324v1

Deposition of Daniel McDonald - January 10, 2011
From (page:line) 62:2 62:16 63:5 63:8 63:15 69:4 69:8 72:24 75:20 76:19 79:4 79:10 79:12 81:24 82:8 83:1 83:4 83:15 83:18 84:18 84:22 85:8 85:18 86:3 86:10 86:20 87:2 87:10 87:19 87:23 88:19 89:2 89:10 89:15 89:21 90:2 98:16 100:20 102:30 To (page:line) 62:13 63:3 63:6 63:13 63:22 69:5 70:16 73:13 76:17 77:8 79:8 79:10 79:13 82:5 82:13 83:2 84:13 83:16 84:15 84:20 85:5 85:16 85:24 86:7 86:17 86:23 87:7 87:16 87:21 88:17 88:23 89:7 89:12 89:18 89:23 90:5 99:8 102:6 103:20 Objections 62:9-13 ­ 701, E 63:2-3 ­ CS 63:5 ­ CS 63:8-11 ­ CS; 63:12-13 ­ 602 63:15-22 ­ 602

76:17 ­ NR 76:19-77:2 ­ NR

84:13-15 ­ Leading 84:18-19 ­ Leading

87:21 ­ CS 87:23-88:2 ­ CS, F; 88:14-17 ­ CS CS 89:2-5 ­ CS; 89:6-7 ­ 701, E 89:10 ­ 701, E; 89:11-12 ­ F, 701, E, L 89:15-16 ­ F, 701, E, L; 89:17-18 ­ L 89:21 ­ L

Dallas 320324v1

Deposition of Shawn Ostermann - January 6, 2011
From (page:line) 6:9 6:19 7:13 8:19 9:11 9:18 10:25 16:3 16:21 17:15 19:16 20:1 21:7 23:1 30:3 31:6 34:20 35:6 37:1 37:13 38:7 40:3 42:11 44:12 47:9 48:11 48:17 50:20 56:7 59:21 63:7 64:18 64:25 65:21 67:11 68:25 72:13 72:25 74:8 111:20 112:4 To (page:line) 6:17 7:6 8:11 8:24 9:12 10:8 11:2 16:19 17:11 17:24 19:18 20:16 21:16 25:10 31:4 34:18 34:24 35:9 37:10 37:20 39:18 40:5 43:6 46:17 48:5 48:12 50:7 51:12 59:19 61:5 64:16 64:19 65:13 67:4 68:11 69:19 72:17 74:6 74:8 111:25 112:10 Objections

21:12-16 - 402, 403

Dallas 320324v1

Deposition of Shawn Ostermann - January 6, 2011
From (page:line) 112:12 To (page:line) 112:12 Objections

Deposition of Jeffrey Schiller - January 7, 2011
From (page:line) 8:13 12:20 13:7 14:4 14:13 14:25 15:9 15:13 18:8 22:11 22:24 23:21 23:24 27:22 31:2 31:18 33:18 34:13 34:21 37:5 37:8 37:20 38:25 43:23 44:16 45:11 45:22 To (page:line) 8:20 12:22 13:15 14:6 14:15 15:2 15:10 15:20 21:13 21:20 23:13 23:21 24:10 27:25 31:15 31:19 34:3 34:16 34:24 37:6 37:18 37:21 39:19 44:7 45:5 45:20 46:1 Objections

13:12-15 ­ INC INC

21:1-13 ­ INC

Dallas 320324v1

OBJECTION KEY TO DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Code 106 Objection This testimony is objectionable because it is incomplete and the introduction of the remaining portions ought, in fairness, to be considered contemporaneously with it (see F.R.E. 106). This testimony is objectionable because it is not relevant (see F.R.E. 402). Misleading. Confusion of issues. This testimony is objectionable because its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Compromise and offer to compromise (FRE 408). This testimony is objectionable because it constitutes testimony on a matter as to which the witness lacks personal knowledge (see F.R.E. 602). This testimony is objectionable because it is opinion testimony by a lay witness that is not reasonably based on perception and helpful to a clear understanding of the witness' testimony or the determination of a fact in dispute (see F.R.E. 701). Hearsay. This testimony is objectionable because it is a statement made by one other than the declarant while testifying at trial, offered into evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted and not subject to any hearsay exception (see F.R.E. 801 and 802). This testimony is objectionable because it concerns a document for which authentication is lacking (see F.R.E. 901). Attorney Client Privilege and/or Work Product Immunity Asked and Answered This testimony is objectionable because it assumes a fact not in evidence. Argumentative (see FRCP 611(a)). Bolstering. This testimony in objectionable because it is improper to bolster the credibility of a witness before credibility is attacked (see FRCP 608(a)). Not best evidence (FRE 1002) Compound Question Calls for Speculation

402 403 408 602 701

801

A A/C AA AF AR B BER CQ CS

Dallas 320324v1

E

This testimony is objectionable because it constitutes attempted expert testimony from a person who was not designated as an expert and who did not submit an expert report (see FRCP 26). This testimony is objectionable because it lacks foundation. This testimony is objectionable because it constitutes harrassment or it is unduly embarrassing to the witness (see F.R.E. 611(f)). This testimony is objectionable because it is an incomplete answer. This testimony is objectionable because it has characterized a person or conduct with unwarranted suggestive, argumentative, or impertinent language (see FRCP 103(c); 404-405). Improper opinion testimony by expert witness (FRE 702) Incomplete question/answer. This testimony is objectionable because it is an incomplete question. Mischaracterizes witness's testimony Nonresponsive Outside the scope of Rule 30(b)(6) topics. Vague. Waste of time/Cumulative evidence (FRE 403) Leading the Witness (F.R.E. 611(c)).

F H IA IC

IE INC IQ MC NR OS V WC L

Dallas 320324v1

Dated: March 18, 2011.

Respectfully submitted, McKOOL SMITH, P.C. _/s/ Douglas A. Cawley ________ Douglas A. Cawley, Lead Attorney Texas Bar No. 04035500 [e-mail] Theodore Stevenson, III Texas Bar No. 19196650 [e-mail] Rosemary T. Snider Texas Bar No. 18796500 [e-mail] Scott W. Hejny Texas State Bar No. 24038952 [e-mail] Jason D. Cassady Texas Bar No. 24045625 [e-mail] J. Austin Curry Texas Bar No. 24059636 [e-mail] Phillip M. Aurentz Texas State Bar No. 24059404 [e-mail] Daniel R. Pearson Texas State Bar No. 24070398 [e-mail] McKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 214-978-4044 Sam F. Baxter Texas Bar No. 01938000 McKOOL SMITH, P.C. [e-mail] 104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300 P.O. Box 0 Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

Dallas 320324v1

Robert M. Parker Texas Bar No. 15498000 Robert Christopher Bunt Texas Bar No. 00787165 PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C. 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 903-533-9687 E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that, on March 18, 2010, the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this notice was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A).

/s/ Jason D. Cassady Jason D. Cassady

______

Dallas 320324v1