Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
Opposed MOTION for Leave to Serve an Expert Report for Reexamination Procedures in the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice by AOL Inc, Amazon.com Inc., Google Inc., MySpace Inc., Softlayer Technologies, Inc., Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of H. Lien, #2 Exhibit A - USPTO Notice of Intent, #3 Exhibit B - Form PTO 1449, #4 Exhibit C - Order re Request for Ex Parte Reexam, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael)
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et alDoc. 668 A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO. 6:09CV00269 Hon. Leonard E. Davis
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DECLARATION OF HENRY LIEN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE AN EXPERT REPORT REGARDING REEXAMINATION PROCEDURES IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
I, Henry Lien, declare as follows: 1. I am a member of the bar of the State of California and an associate at Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, attorneys for Google Inc. 2. Each of the following statements is made of my own personal knowledge, and if
called upon to testify thereto, I could and would competently do so. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the "Notice of Intent to
Issue a Reexam Certificate," dated January 14, 2011. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Form PTO 1449, "List
of References Cited By Applicant," dated January 5, 2011. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of "Order Granting
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination," dated February 22, 2011. 6. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America
that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 28, 2011 in Redwood Shores, CA.
/s/ Henry Lien
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?