Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
1245
Proposed Jury Instructions by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Appendix A, # 4 Appendix B, # 5 Appendix C, # 6 Exhibit C, # 7 Exhibit D, # 8 Exhibit E, # 9 Exhibit F, # 10 Exhibit G, # 11 Exhibit H, # 12 Exhibit I, # 13 Exhibit J, # 14 Exhibit K)(McKool, Mike)
EXHIBIT K
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
Plaintiff,
§
§
vs.
§ Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446-LED
§
Adobe Systems, Inc.., Amazon.com, Inc.,
§
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., §
§
eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy
§
Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney
Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New §
§
Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc.,
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A- §
§
Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems
Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and §
§
YouTube, LLC,
§
§
Defendants.
§
Eolas Technologies, Inc.,
VERDICT FORM
In answering these questions, you are to follow the instructions I have given you in the
Charge of Court.
INFRINGEMENT
1.
Did Eolas prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Yahoo! infringes one or more
claims of the asserted patents?
Answer “Yes” or “No” to the question below. If you answer “No,” please
proceed to the next question. If you answer “Yes,” please check the claim(s) you
found infringed and indicate whether the infringement was direct and/or indirect
on the chart below.
Yes ____
No ____
‘906 Patent
Type of Infringement
Claim 1
Direct ____
Indirect ____
Claim 6
Direct ____
Indirect ____
Claim 1
Direct ____
Indirect ____
Claim 3
Direct ____
Indirect ____
Claim 16
Direct ____
Indirect ____
Claim 18
Direct ____
Indirect ____
Claim 20
Direct ____
Indirect ____
Claim 22
Direct ____
Indirect ____
Claim 36
Direct ____
Indirect ____
Claim 38
Direct ____
Indirect ____
Claim 40
Direct ____
Indirect ____
Claim 42
Direct ____
Indirect ____
‘985 Patent
INVALIDITY
2.
For each asserted claim, did Defendants prove by clear and convincing evidence that the
claim is invalid for anticipation, obviousness or lack of written description?
Answer “Yes” or “No” to each question below. Answer questions for all claims
regardless of whether you have found those claims were infringed.
‘906 Patent
Invalid?
Claim 1
Yes ____
No ____
Claim 6
Yes ____
No ____
Claim 1
Yes ____
No ____
Claim 3
Claim 16
Yes ____
Yes ____
No ____
No ____
Claim 18
Yes ____
No ____
Claim 20
Yes ____
No ____
Claim 22
Yes ____
No ____
Claim 36
Yes ____
No ____
Claim 38
Yes ____
No ____
Claim 40
Yes ____
No ____
Claim 42
Yes ____
No ____
‘985 Patent
WILLFULNESS
ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS FOR EACH PATENT ONLY IF YOU ANSWERED “YES”
IN QUESTION 1 ABOVE FOR EACH PATENT – OTHERWISE SKIP THIS QUESTION
AND PROCEED TO QUESTION 4
3.
Did Eolas prove by clear and convincing evidence that Yahoo! willfully infringed the
patents in suit?
Answer “Yes” or “No” for each listed patent:
‘906 Patent:
Yes ____
No ____
‘985 Patent:
Yes ____
No ____
INEQUITABLE CONDUCT
4.
Did Defendants prove by clear and convincing evidence that:
a) Anyone involved in the prosecution of the ’906 and ’985 patents withheld
material prior art from the Patent and Trademark Office?
Please answer “Yes” or “No” in the spaces provided below
Yes ____ No ____
b) Any withholding of material prior art to the ’906 and ’985 patents from the Patent
and Trademark Office was done with intent to deceive?
Please answer “Yes” or “No” in the spaces provided below
Yes ____ No ____
DAMAGES
ANSWER THIS QUESTION ONLY IF YOU FOUND ANY ASSERTED CLAIMS
INFRINGED AND NOT INVALID. IF YOU FOUND NO CLAIMS INFRINGED
AND NOT INVALID, PLEASE DO NOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION.
5.
What sum of money, if any, do you find from a preponderance of the evidence would
fairly and reasonably compensate Eolas for Yahoo!’s current, past, and future
infringement of the patent claims that you have found were infringed and not invalid?
Please enter the amount of damages below.
Damages Awarded
Amount
$_________________________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?