Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1245

Proposed Jury Instructions by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Appendix A, # 4 Appendix B, # 5 Appendix C, # 6 Exhibit C, # 7 Exhibit D, # 8 Exhibit E, # 9 Exhibit F, # 10 Exhibit G, # 11 Exhibit H, # 12 Exhibit I, # 13 Exhibit J, # 14 Exhibit K)(McKool, Mike)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT D IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § Plaintiff, § § vs. § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446-LED § Adobe Systems, Inc.., Amazon.com, Inc., § Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., § § eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy § Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New § § Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A- § § Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and § § YouTube, LLC, § § Defendants. § Eolas Technologies, Inc., VERDICT FORM In answering these questions, you are to follow the instructions I have given you in the Charge of Court. INFRINGEMENT 1. Did Eolas prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Adobe directly infringes any of the following asserted claims of the ‘906 patent? Answer “Yes” or “No” to each question below. ‘906 Patent Yes No Claim 1 Claim 6 2. Did Eolas prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Adobe has induced infringement of any of the following asserted claims of the ‘906 patent? Answer “Yes” or “No” to each question below. ‘906 Patent Yes No Claim 1 Claim 6 3. Did Eolas prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Adobe directly infringes any of the following asserted claims of the ‘985 patent? Answer “Yes” or “No” to each question below. ‘985 Patent Yes No Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 1 Claim 8 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 16 Claim 17 Claim 18 Claim 20 Claim 21 Claim 22 Claim 36 Claim 37 Claim 38 Claim 39 Claim 40 Claim 41 Claim 42 Claim 43 2 4. Did Eolas prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Adobe has induced infringement of any of the following asserted claims of the ‘985 patent? Answer “Yes” or “No” to each question below. ‘985 Patent Yes No Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 8 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 16 Claim 17 Claim 18 Claim 20 Claim 21 Claim 22 Claim 36 Claim 37 Claim 38 Claim 39 Claim 40 Claim 41 Claim 42 3 Claim 43 4 INVALIDITY 5. Did Defendants prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the asserted patent claims is invalid? Answer “Yes” or “No” to each question below. Your answer need not be the same for each question, but you may find that a claim is invalid on any or all of these bases. Answer all questions for all claims regardless of whether you have found those claims were infringed. ‘906 Patent Anticipation? Obviousness? Written description? Anticipation? Obviousness? Written description? Claim 1 Claim 6 ‘985 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 8 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 16 Claim 17 Claim 18 Claim 20 Claim 21 Claim 22 Claim 36 Claim 37 Claim 38 Claim 39 Claim 40 Claim 41 Claim 42 Claim 43 5 INEQUITABLE CONDUCT Did Defendants prove by clear and convincing evidence that: a) Anyone involved in the prosecution of the ’906 or ’985 patents withheld material prior art from the Patent and Trademark Office? Please answer “Yes” or “No” in the spaces provided below Yes ____ No ____ b) Any withholding of material prior art to the ’906 or ’985 patents from the Patent and Trademark Office was done with intent to deceive? Please answer “Yes” or “No” in the spaces provided below Yes ____ No ____ 6 DAMAGES ANSWER THIS QUESTION ONLY FOR ANY ASSERTED CLAIMS YOU FOUND BOTH INFRINGED AND NOT INVALID. IF YOU FOUND NO CLAIMS INFRINGED AND NOT INVALID, PLEASE DO NOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION. What sum of money, if any, do you find from a preponderance of the evidence would fairly and reasonably compensate Eolas for Adobe’s current, past, and future infringement of the patent claims that you have found were infringed and not invalid? License Fee Damages $_________________________ Profit Split Damages (if any) $_________________________ 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?