Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1341

PLEASE IGNORE. FILED IN ERROR. CORRECTED DOCUMENT REFILED AT DE 1342. PLEASE IGNORE. TRIAL BRIEF DEFENDANTS' OFFER OF PROOF REGARDING TIME LIMITATION FOR INVALIDITY TRIAL by Adobe Systems Incorporated, Amazon.com Inc., CDW Corporation, Google Inc., J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Staples, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jennifer H. Doan, # 2 Declaration of Andrew L. Perito, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit L)(Doan, Jennifer) Modified on 2/9/2012 (leh, ).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT L Case Clip(s) Detailed Report Saturday, February 04, 2012, 9:54:31 AM Radjev_Sunita Rajdev, Sunita (Vol. 01) - 01/10/2012 1 CLIP (RUNNING 00:03:52.901) Rajdev_Defendants SR01 27 SEGMENTS (RUNNING 00:03:52.901) 1. PAGE 6:07 TO 6:09 (RUNNING 00:00:03.472) 07 08 09 Q Will you please state your full name for the record? A Sunita Rajdev. 2. PAGE 7:03 TO 7:05 (RUNNING 00:00:05.660) 03 04 05 Q Dr. Rajdev, what is your position with the University of California? A I'm a senior licensing officer. 3. PAGE 78:24 TO 79:04 (RUNNING 00:00:16.206) 24 25 00079:01 02 03 04 Q Have you ever spoken to the technical expert, David M. Martin, in this case? A Not the inventor? Q There is two David Martins: One is David C. Martin and one is David M. Martin. A I have not spoken to David M. Martin. 4. PAGE 80:11 TO 80:17 (RUNNING 00:00:16.187) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Q A Have you read the '985 patent? I have not read. I know what it covers, but I have not read it. Q Same thing with respect to the '906 patent. Have you actually read that patent or do you know what it covers? A I've looked at it. 5. PAGE 81:02 TO 81:04 (RUNNING 00:00:04.547) 02 03 04 Other than that, have you ever read the '906 patent? A No. 6. PAGE 88:05 TO 88:20 (RUNNING 00:00:29.287) 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Q Do you know how many claims are included in the '906 patent? A I do not. Q Okay. Do you know how many claims are in the '985 patent? A No, I do not. Q Do you know what technologies are covered by the '985 patent? A It's the use of plug-ins. Q Okay. And what -- what about with respect to the use of plug-ins? A I do not know the details. It's the use of specific Ajax and plug-in, and I do not know the specific details. 7. PAGE 89:22 TO 89:23 (RUNNING 00:00:02.474) 22 23 CONFIDENTIAL Q Do you know how many claims are in the '985 patent? page 1 Case Clip(s) Detailed Report Saturday, February 04, 2012, 9:54:31 AM Radjev_Sunita 8. PAGE 89:25 TO 89:25 (RUNNING 00:00:01.792) 25 THE WITNESS: I do not recall right now. 9. PAGE 130:15 TO 130:17 (RUNNING 00:00:04.906) 15 16 17 Do you know of any university or institution that is teaching with the AnatLab product? 10. PAGE 130:19 TO 130:19 (RUNNING 00:00:01.189) 19 THE WITNESS: I do not know. 11. PAGE 140:01 TO 140:02 (RUNNING 00:00:11.296) 00140:01 02 Do you know of any product that Eolas currently has on the market? 12. PAGE 140:04 TO 140:07 (RUNNING 00:00:02.545) 04 05 06 07 THE WITNESS: BY MS. DOAN: Q Yes, ma'am. A No. Actually on the market? 13. PAGE 156:04 TO 156:09 (RUNNING 00:00:22.516) 04 05 06 07 08 09 What date did Dr. Martin and Dr. Cheong [sic] and Michael Doyle tell the University of California that they first conceived of the invention which later became the '906 patent? A I think it was sometime in 1994, but I can't recall the exact date. 14. PAGE 175:05 TO 175:08 (RUNNING 00:00:15.806) 05 06 07 08 Q What documents is the University aware of that Pei Wei provided to Dr. Doyle prior to the University of California applying for the '906 patent? 15. PAGE 175:10 TO 175:14 (RUNNING 00:00:04.270) 10 11 12 13 14 THE WITNESS: Prior to the University applying? BY MS. DOAN: Q Yes, ma'am. A I do not know. 16. PAGE 187:22 TO 187:25 (RUNNING 00:00:10.127) 22 23 24 25 Q Do you know if the Viola browser or any information about Pei Wei was sent to the -- the patent -- patent office during the patent prosecution of the '906 patent? 17. PAGE 188:02 TO 188:08 (RUNNING 00:00:15.270) 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 THE WITNESS: I do not know. BY MS. DOAN: Q Have you ever seen any documents that the University of California submitted to the patent office during the patent prosecution of the '906 patent that would reflect disclosure of Pei Wei's invention or the Viola browser? 18. PAGE 188:11 TO 188:11 (RUNNING 00:00:01.648) 11 CONFIDENTIAL THE WITNESS: I do not know. page 2 Case Clip(s) Detailed Report Saturday, February 04, 2012, 9:54:31 AM Radjev_Sunita 19. PAGE 189:24 TO 190:01 (RUNNING 00:00:08.256) 24 25 00190:01 Q And did the University of California submit any documents with respect to the '906 patent prosecution with respect to the Viola browser? 20. PAGE 190:03 TO 190:03 (RUNNING 00:00:01.632) 03 THE WITNESS: I do not know. 21. PAGE 191:02 TO 191:06 (RUNNING 00:00:14.204) 02 03 04 05 06 Did the University of California ever tell the United States Patent Office that Pei Wei claimed to have invented the technology that Michael Doyle is claiming is in the '906 patent during the patent prosecution of the '906 patent? 22. PAGE 191:09 TO 191:14 (RUNNING 00:00:20.975) 09 10 11 12 13 14 THE WITNESS: I do not know. BY MS. DOAN: Q Have the University of California Regents ever conducted a review or analysis as to whether Pei Wei invented the Viola browser before Michael Doyle applied for the '906 patent? 23. PAGE 191:16 TO 191:16 (RUNNING 00:00:01.341) 16 THE WITNESS: Not that I know of. 24. PAGE 210:02 TO 210:04 (RUNNING 00:00:05.498) 02 03 04 What steps did the University of California engage in to look for prior art when it applied for the '906 patent? 25. PAGE 210:07 TO 210:07 (RUNNING 00:00:01.380) 07 THE WITNESS: I do not know. 26. PAGE 240:15 TO 240:18 (RUNNING 00:00:09.201) 15 16 17 18 Do you know who at the University of California, separate and apart from its counsel, has reviewed the prior art that's been produced by the Defendants in this litigation? 27. PAGE 240:21 TO 240:21 (RUNNING 00:00:01.216) 21 THE WITNESS: I do not know. TOTAL: 1 CLIP FROM 1 DEPOSITION (RUNNING 00:03:52.901) CONFIDENTIAL page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?