Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 214

MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Teague I. Donahey, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20, # 22 Exhibit 21, # 23 Exhibit 22, # 24 Exhibit 23, # 25 Exhibit 24, # 26 Exhibit 25, # 27 Exhibit 26, # 28 Exhibit 27, # 29 Exhibit 28, # 30 Exhibit 29, # 31 Exhibit 30, # 32 Exhibit 31, # 33 Exhibit 32, # 34 Exhibit 33, # 35 Exhibit 34, # 36 Exhibit 35, # 37 Exhibit 36, # 38 Exhibit 37, # 39 Exhibit 38, # 40 Exhibit 39, # 41 Exhibit 40, # 42 Exhibit 41, # 43 Exhibit 42, # 44 Exhibit 43, # 45 Exhibit 44, # 46 Exhibit 45, # 47 Exhibit 46, # 48 Exhibit 47, # 49 Exhibit 48, # 50 Exhibit 49, # 51 Exhibit 50, # 52 Exhibit 51, # 53 Exhibit 52, # 54 Exhibit 53, # 55 Exhibit 54, # 56 Exhibit 55, # 57 Exhibit 56, # 58 Exhibit 57, # 59 Exhibit 58, # 60 Exhibit 59, # 61 Exhibit 60, # 62 Exhibit 61, # 63 Exhibit 62, # 64 Exhibit 63, # 65 Exhibit 64, # 66 Exhibit 65, # 67 Exhibit 66, # 68 Exhibit 67, # 69 Exhibit 68, # 70 Exhibit 69, # 71 Exhibit 70, # 72 Exhibit 71, # 73 Exhibit 72, # 74 Exhibit 73, # 75 Exhibit 74, # 76 Exhibit 75, # 77 Affidavit Darin Adler, # 78 Exhibit A, # 79 Exhibit B, # 80 Affidavit Marc D. Callipari, # 81 Affidavit Jeetendra Kaul, # 82 Affidavit Steven Mansour, # 83 Affidavit Mark Risher, # 84 Affidavit Sean Scott, # 85 Affidavit Prasad Setty, # 86 Affidavit Jason W. Wolff, # 87 Text of Proposed Order)(Cederoth, Richard) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/11/2010: # 88 Corrected Proposed Order) (mjc, ).

EXHIBIT 7

so ,p l o e " " , " " ,

..........

, ..- {h t l l r t : ; { , , ' , , ' .

UNIVERSITY of CALI FORNIA

.....

' ; -)2'"" {1t. ~, \;~ . f
L~
I

~ 1lI:!:II ~
UC Newsroom
0000- 0 0 - 0 0

RSS

HoI TOPic'

ArdWes

PIdr;a~5

UC.., Espailol

VIdeos

Twitter

ADOut

Questions and Answers about UCIEolas palent infringement sui! against Microsoft
~_..-

Q , Whal is !he palented IICMOIOOY l1li1 WU alll_ In Ihe en.? "- Tne palemea leamOlOOJ II a key compontOi 01 "" InlI~C3MI1_able on lIle lnIemenooay. R aHows weD page OtYelopers 10 emDed interadlYe ProQrams In WeD pagel A DOWser, 'Qulpp,d with "'e Uniwlrsily 01 Calttornl"s patented tedmOiOIlY, I. able 10 deliver "'aI inte ~dMtt 10 user For e.amplt, " ' t ledmOlOOJ Is und alliin willi stock information . ... deo pla)1lrs. games, .t~aI real estate tours and OIher interadive conlent on I" Wab. Th' p,lIenl allows "'e Web to be a pla ~orm lor IUIIJ Inte~di"" embedded applit.ations

"'t

O. How did llis iffvenIion come aDOUl1 "- In 1993. as part 01"" Innovative SOft..... r. Syslems Group ,I"'e UC San Frandsco campus. researdlers Midlael 00)1'. DlMd Mallin and Cheoog Mg Wilr' WO!I(jng to ranslo,," how lden~ftc Inl o r m . t i o n was cre ated. accessed and published. loS p.1I 01 lIleir re s e a r d l . lIley began to explo", Ill. posslbtily 01 e)(Oan(!;ng "'e sden""s by allowing sdentists to read not 0I11y -..flat was publ ish ed online butto interact W111l mat data, W,lle earty Web palli(lpanlS struggled to implement helper applicaDOI1 I , OO)le .M ~is team W<!re already examining me poten~aI (j lilt Web to become a pla~ orm lor lull y interactMl embedded 3IlPlit.alO11S The UC patent o1i\jinated !Tom mi s fesUldI ,
O.II 1!>e patent r... ates to I>I"OWMr techooiog;. why Wei Ihe Wirdows product discussed dun"", 1!>e CIIS"? " Microson ~und l ed its Internet Expl orer Web ~r)wser with its Wi n d o w s produd and made !I1em an int e~raled , Sin g l e PfOQuCl. Microson ";ewed ~und li n~ Internet E-'Ili Ole r willl WIf1 dows as esse ntia l to game rin~ browser martel shalO, wh i d l Micro so n ";ewed as critical to pres. M n g ~ s WI n dOWS lrendllse O. Why w~snl UC. plllintin Bt me DegInnIrog 0I1he cne? " UC joined the laws u~ wI1.n Microsoft maCle eltga~O<\s lIlat Eolas could ~ot proClled in rts name alon ·. UC jOOn e d ~t.aust ~ I. an importanllawsuit The UnMlfSily · .:p.as to be lalrly co-mpenSil ed 1<>1 use of rts patented tedln oll>!1l'.

a. Won, llis pat"'" put , . tr,r.gIeIlOId on Ihe I1t.",..t?
" Uc ~CC"" lair compcnoollon for lI>e "DC of lI>.technoiogy m~de by UiO'oooll'o Internet Explore, Web brOW<:e, ,,0. Wl>ic:t\ allowed Uicrosoll to gamer majorily s~ar. in 11>. ()fOWSItl martet .nd, in 50 doing, r.ap binions of dOllars in prolltS.
~~o

a . 1rVhat is me reialiOnSl'tip befWeerl UC and EoIn1 "- EOi a s has had ..CluS .... ~ghtS to the teCllnoicOJ tinct 1 ~ . Under the terms ofth. W""nse agreem e n t w i l l l UC. EoIa! II to p.. y the LIniwIrsilylor products · ma~es under 11>1 P,Ie'" and lor ~ctnSIS Agrant: under the patent a. Why _ , IokrosOfIlicense me tecnnoloOY!rom UCl "- U i c r o s o l l w a s contacted in 199., along with a number 01 other companieS, regarding the teclmOlI>!1l' UC t.aMot SPICUlate as to wI1y Uicroson never pursued IIctnsing OIIPortun~ts "'In.

a. Why did UC ~ [O!aS uClulivt fiQIIIS 10 IN tec/lnoloO;Wl "- In 1994. UC decrded mat EOIa!, fOuMed by 00)1'. best understood "'e tedmOlI>!1l' and w a s in "'e best posltiOO to ~nng the tedlnotl>!1l' Into me commercial m.rt.elPlatt 'Nlliia "'a patent application was pending. UicrosOit and OIhers adopted me tedlnotl>!1l' lor use in its prOducts Th. ",sun Wi! m,~ by "'e time "'e patent issued. Eel a . had been crowded out 01111. m a r t e tpla " "
O. t """""-Uloo lI..n .. ~ey pan Of MIcrosoft' s delense wal1hrown out 01 me Cllse? " One ot Microsoft'S defenses related to ~s dal., "'al UC"s patent is invali d because a Mr. Pel Wei i"""nted lIle tedlnot~! P~()( to UC's im.mt()(s fOllOwing presentatjon 01 m at "tdenct by Uicrosoft at Ilial, !I1e judjje determined mal as a matter OIIIW, no jury could nnd Tor Microsoft on mat ISSUI ,
O. 1rVhat .... pj>eflS

Ile.t?

" There wi ll ~e pOSl-trl a l pfooee~ln ~s, wI1lct1 wli I~dude an aC1:O\J ntin g lor ~ i crosoft sa les ooo.Jlfin~ after September 200 1, tn e cul·o~ d.lo fo, d . m . ~ .. dOlorm in ott Dy me Jury UC I n d Col .. wi ll I I, Q , ·· ~ p'.iud~monl into,o,1. MiCfO'Oft will ~ ..... on opportun ity to appea l tne fin a l judgment to m e Flderal CirClJ it Cou rt 01 A/lpea l s, a l thou~h unrversily counse l T. e l s COOl <U nt mat m. Federal C~cu it wi ll upMltt tn . ~na l determlnatiol,

II foe_
c ",1" _
ot ... .... ,.....- of CoiI_

~.... mJ D'tII _- Del.ldo-u . U F..-t

n ,,_

Ills...",

© , , -to
I . ~I ·· hdo<

I§:'<;....-I M vl .......""

l: T-"~
ot"'vNor. _ _

5 ;.. _

.. _

.. IE 5, N..,.c.o . . 6

"" "'-..... SL. Oold..-.l. CA 94601 , ' 2 0 0