Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
377
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery re: Rolling Production Pursuant to Discovery Order by Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ross, Avelyn)
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Doc. 377
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penny Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §
C.A. NO. 6:09-CV-446 (LED)
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DEFENDANT PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE CERTAIN DISCOVERY Defendant Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. ("Playboy") hereby moves the Court for an extension of time to complete certain discovery. The parties have conferred regarding the relief requested herein and this motion is unopposed. The deadline for the parties to conclude document production is currently set for August 25, 2010. The parties have conferred and agreed that the deadline for completion of Playboy's document production should be extended to September 6, 2010. Accordingly, Playboy
respectfully requests that the Court grant this unopposed Motion and extend the specified production deadlines for Playboy until September 6, 2010.
1
US 498449v.1
Dockets.Justia.com
Dated: August 4, 2010
Respectfully submitted, /s/ Avelyn M. Ross David B. Weaver (TX Bar No. 00798576) Avelyn M. Ross (TX Bar No. 24027871) Gentry C. McLean (TX Bar No. 24046403) John A. Fedock (TX Bar No. 24059737) VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P. 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78746-7568 Tel: (512) 542-8400 Fax: (512) 236-3218 dweaver@velaw.com aross@velaw.com gmclean@velaw.com jfedock@velaw.com Counsel for Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on August 4, 2010. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date. /s/ Avelyn M. Ross Avelyn M. Ross
2
US 498449v.1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penny Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §
C.A. NO. 6:09-CV-446 (LED)
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE CERTAIN DISCOVERY The Court, having considered the motion of Defendant Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. ("Playboy") to extend certain discovery deadlines and finding no objection to it, hereby GRANTS the motion. IT IS ORDERED that Playboy shall have until September 6, 2010 to complete the rolling production of documents as required by paragraph 2(B) of the Joint Agreed Discovery Order [Dkt. No. 247].
US 498449v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?