WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 484

RESPONSE in Opposition re 475 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - July 9 PM Tr, # 2 Exhibit B - 2013-03-21 Pre-Trial Hearing Transcript, # 3 Exhibit C - July 10 AM Tr, # 4 Exhibit D - Lanning report excerpt, # 5 Exhibit E - Email from Justin Cohen to Ajeet Pai (June 23, 2013), # 6 Exhibit F - July 12 AM Tr, # 7 Text of Proposed Order)(Weaver, David)

Download PDF
Exhibit D IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION WI-LAN INC., Plaintiff, v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.; Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson; Ericsson Inc.; Sony Mobile Communications AB; Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.; HTC Corporation; HTC America, Inc.; Exedea Inc.; LG Electronics, Inc.; LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc.; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. Case No. 6:10-cv-00521-LED Defendants. EXPERT REPORT OF MARK LANNING REGARDING INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NUMBERS: 6,088,326; 6,195,327; 6,222,819; and 6,381,211. subject matter recited in each of those claims would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art of the each of the Patents-in-Suit in light of the technical information available to such a person at the time the application for this patent was filed. My detailed analysis is included in claim charts attached as Appendix 5 through Appendix 34. 398. In performing my analysis, I have relied on my own personal knowledge and extensive experience in the design, development, network design and operation of the relevant systems as well as my review of the Patents-in-Suit and their prosecution histories. Other documents or materials that I have reviewed are listed in Appendix 2. A. The Asserted Claims of the 326 Patent Are Invalid 399. It is my opinion that the Asserted Claims of the 326 Patent are invalid for at least the reasons shown in the following table. 326 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Invalidity Opinions Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Leppanen. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sato. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of IS-95-A. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Mohanty. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Miller. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. comb Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 143 of 165 326 Patent Claim 3 Claim 4 Invalidity Opinions Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Leppanen. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sato. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of IS-95-A. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Mohanty. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Miller. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Leppanen. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sato. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of IS-95-A. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Mohanty. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Miller. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Mohanty. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 144 of 165 326 Patent Claim 5 Claim 6 Invalidity Opinions Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. comb Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of IS-95-A. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 145 of 165 326 Patent Claim 7 Claim 8 Invalidity Opinions Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of IS-95-A. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of IS-95-A. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 146 of 165 326 Patent Claim 9 Claim 10 Invalidity Opinions Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of IS-95-A. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Miller. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. comb Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of IS-95-A. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Miller. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 147 of 165 326 Patent B. Invalidity Opinions Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. The Asserted Claims of the 211 Patent are Invalid 400. It is my opinion that the Asserted Claims of the 211 Patent are invalid for at least the reasons shown in the following table. 211 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Invalidity Opinions Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Leppanen. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sato. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of IS-95-A. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Mohanty. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Miller. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 148 of 165 211 Patent Claim 3 Invalidity Opinions Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. comb Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Leppanen. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sato. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of IS-95-A. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Mohanty. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Miller. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 149 of 165 211 Patent Claim 4 Claim 5 Invalidity Opinions Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Leppanen. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sato. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of IS-95-A. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Mohanty. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Miller. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Mohanty. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Anderson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Obvious in light of IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Leppanen combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. comb Obvious in light of Sato combined with Gilhousen 652. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 150 of 165 211 Patent C. Invalidity Opinions Obvious in light of Sato combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Anderson combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Mohanty combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Miller combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Murai combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. The Asserted Claims of the 819 Patent Are Invalid 401. It is my opinion that the Asserted Claims of the 819 Patent are invalid for at least the reasons shown in the following table. 819 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Invalidity Opinions Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi 497. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sawahashi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Murai. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Zehavi 497. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Sawahashi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Murai. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Zehavi 497. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Sawahashi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi 497. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sawahashi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 151 of 165 819 Patent Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Invalidity Opinions Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Murai. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Zehavi 497. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi and IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Murai. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Zehavi 497. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi 497. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sawahashi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Murai. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Zehavi 497. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi and IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Murai. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Zehavi 497. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi 497. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sawahashi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Murai. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Zehavi 497. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi and IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Murai. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Zehavi 497. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 155 of 165 819 Patent Claim 12 Invalidity Opinions Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sawahashi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Murai. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Zehavi 497. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. comb Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi and IS-95-A. w Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Murai. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Zehavi 497. Claim is indefinite and/or lacks written description and is not enabled for at least the reasons stated in section IX above. Alternatively, if this claim is not found to be indefinite. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi 497. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Sawahashi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A. Claim 13 Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Murai. Obvious in light of IS-95-A combined with Zehavi 497. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Tiedemann or Zehavi. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Murai. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Zehavi 497. Claim is indefinite and/or lacks written description and is not enabled for at least the reasons stated in section IX above. Alternatively, if this claim is not found to be indefinite. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of the PCS System described by Tiedemann. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Zehavi. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Murai. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 156 of 165 D. The Asserted Claims of the 327 Patent Are Invalid 402. It is my opinion that the Asserted Claims of the 327 Patent are invalid for at least the reasons shown in the following table. 327 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 8 Invalidity Opinions Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Ishikawa. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Andersson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Jones. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Ishikawa. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Andersson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Jones. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Ishikawa. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Andersson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Jones. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Ishikawa. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Andersson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Jones. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Ishikawa. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Jones. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Gilhousen 652. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 161 of 165 327 Patent Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Invalidity Opinions Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Ishikawa. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Andersson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Jones. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Ishikawa. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Andersson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Jones. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Ishikawa. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Andersson. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Jones. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Gitlin combined with Gilhousen 652. Anticipated and/or obvious* in light of Gitlin. Obvious in light of Ishikawa. Obvious in light of Andersson. Obvious in light of Jones. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Tiedemann. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Gitlin. Obvious in light of Ishikawa combined with Zehavi. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with Tiedemann. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with Gitlin. Obvious in light of Andersson combined with Zehavi. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Gilhousen 652. Obvious in light of Jones combined with IS-95-A. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Tiedemann. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Gitlin. Obvious in light of Jones combined with Zehavi. Lanning Invalidity Report 2012.09.21 Page 162 of 165

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?