WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 484

RESPONSE in Opposition re 475 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - July 9 PM Tr, # 2 Exhibit B - 2013-03-21 Pre-Trial Hearing Transcript, # 3 Exhibit C - July 10 AM Tr, # 4 Exhibit D - Lanning report excerpt, # 5 Exhibit E - Email from Justin Cohen to Ajeet Pai (June 23, 2013), # 6 Exhibit F - July 12 AM Tr, # 7 Text of Proposed Order)(Weaver, David)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

WI-LAN INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521-LED
Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-252-LED
CASES CONSOLIDATED FOR
TRIAL
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER
Before the Court is Defendants Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM
Ericsson, Ericsson Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, and Sony Mobile Communications
(USA) Inc., HTC Corp., HTC America, Inc., and Exedea Inc’s Motion to Recover Attorneys’
Fees (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 475 (10-cv-521), Dkt. No. 433 (13-cv-252)).
Having considered the papers and the parties’ arguments, the Court finds that the Motion
should be DENIED.
SO ORDERED.