WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 484

RESPONSE in Opposition re 475 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - July 9 PM Tr, # 2 Exhibit B - 2013-03-21 Pre-Trial Hearing Transcript, # 3 Exhibit C - July 10 AM Tr, # 4 Exhibit D - Lanning report excerpt, # 5 Exhibit E - Email from Justin Cohen to Ajeet Pai (June 23, 2013), # 6 Exhibit F - July 12 AM Tr, # 7 Text of Proposed Order)(Weaver, David)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION WI-LAN INC., Plaintiff, v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521-LED Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-252-LED CASES CONSOLIDATED FOR TRIAL JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER Before the Court is Defendants Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Ericsson Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., HTC Corp., HTC America, Inc., and Exedea Inc’s Motion to Recover Attorneys’ Fees (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 475 (10-cv-521), Dkt. No. 433 (13-cv-252)). Having considered the papers and the parties’ arguments, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED. SO ORDERED.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?