WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filing
491
RESPONSE to Motion re 482 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law [RENEWED] OF NO INVALIDITY OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL ON INVALIDITY filed by Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Ericsson Inc., Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: Trial Transcript, # 2 Exhibit B: Trial Transcript, # 3 Exhibit C: Trial Transcript, # 4 Exhibit D: Trial Transcript, # 5 Exhibit E: Trial Transcript, # 6 Exhibit F: Trial Transcript, # 7 Exhibit G: Trial Transcript, # 8 Exhibit H: DDX 13-19, # 9 Exhibit I: DDX 13-31, # 10 Exhibit J: DX 124, # 11 Exhibit K: DX 148, # 12 Exhibit L: PX 1, # 13 Text of Proposed Order)(Heinlen, James)
EXHIBIT A
Page 1
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
2
3
WI-LAN, INC.
)
4
DOCKET NO. 6:10cv521
-vs-
5
6
7
8
9
10
)
Tyler, Texas
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC.,
8:51 a.m.
ET AL
)
July 8, 2013
******************************************************
WI-LAN, INC.
)
DOCKET NO. 6:10cv252
-vs)
HTC CORPORATION,
ET AL
)
11
12
13
14
15
TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL
MORNING SESSION
BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONARD DAVIS,
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, AND A JURY
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
COURT REPORTERS:
MS. SHEA SLOAN
MS. JUDY WERLINGER
211 W. Ferguson
Tyler, Texas 75702
shea_sloan@txed.uscourts.gov
23
24
25
Proceedings taken by Machine Stenotype; transcript was
produced by a Computer.
Page 118
1
important back in that time.
2
So these were the services provided by DSL,
3
and DSL was actually, you know, one of the initial
4
broadband technologies that really created the Internet
5
revolution.
6
been possible without that roll-out.
7
All the things you see today wouldn't have
So, you know, again, that was really what we
8
were looking at.
9
up in the air and going, well, what else can happen?
And everyone was putting their finger
10
the key that we were also looking at is, we had to be
11
extensible and to not try to anticipate what people
12
So
might do on the Internet.
13
People did all kinds of things on the
14
Internet.
15
our systems.
16
Q.
So flexibility was important to future-proof
And so you were looking at a wide variety of
17
data, and you were going to transition from just
18
providing that data via a wired solution, and now you
19
were going to try and provide the same amount of data
20
wirelessly?
21
A.
As close to it as we could.
Obviously with
22
wireless, you do -- and we talked about it in the slides
23
that you saw from the introductions from -- from both of
24
the teams here.
25
expensive commodity.
You saw that wireless is -- is an
So you have to use it very, very
Page 119
1
carefully.
2
The government charges billions of dollars for
3
the use of Spectrum.
4
part of the problem that we had to tackle.
5
look at the data and understand how do I fit this in the
6
most optimal manner in what we're doing?
7
So that was another part of the --
And this wasn't theoretical.
How do you
We were solving
8
a real problem that real people had in the real roll-out
9
in 1995.
It wasn't 10 years in the future.
It was at
10
that very moment we had a product line we needed to
11
build.
12
Q.
It wasn't theoretical.
All right.
It was practical.
So let's -- did you start with --
13
or did DSC have at least a first attempt at a solution,
14
when you arrived in 1995, to this problem?
15
A.
Yes.
DSC had an initial product that was
16
called the Airspan-60 or AS-60.
17
simple CDMA product that used orthogonal codes.
18
you know, orthogonal codes are used because of their
19
unique properties of 0 correlation, cross-correlation.
20
And it was a relatively
And,
So they had low noise across each other.
21
You'll hear a lot about that as we talk a little bit.
22
But the thing about it, it was really inefficient.
23
was designed just like phone lines.
24
look at you, the jury, and the young lady there, we'll
25
call you 1, and the last lady at the end in the back,
It
So if I were to
Page 123
1
2
Q.
Okay.
Well, let's -- let's look at -- you
said that your system was a cellular system.
3
How did your solution that you and Martin and
4
Joe came up with differ from the traditional cellular
5
phone system of the day at a high level?
6
A.
Well, first of all, at a high level at the
7
time, we showed great graphics of this earlier, the --
8
the -- in fact, there were two -- I think it was
9
disingenuous not to note that there was 2.5G that also
10
11
came out after -- or during this time.
There was a lot of work on the fact that there
12
was suddenly, you know, at the time maybe 25 percent of
13
the United States had a cell phone, and they had a big
14
issue with voice capacity.
15
a lot of work on voice capacity and simply making cell
16
phones do two things.
17
So during that time, you saw
One, make sure we could handle more voice
18
capacity with the Spectrum we had.
19
to send texts -- texts.
20
kind of came around in the mid-'90s, right?
21
And two, you wanted
Those were the big things that
What we were worried about was immediately a
22
problem of we were rolling out the Internet.
23
rolling out broadband, and we already saw we had gaps.
24
And our customers, the Bell operating companies and
25
international companies, really had a need to have those
We were
Page 177
1
2
THE COURT:
released.
You're finally
You may go home and good luck.
3
4
All right.
All right.
Anything further before we
break for lunch?
5
MR. WEAVER:
6
THE COURT:
7
Be in recess.
8
COURT SECURITY OFFICER:
9
(Lunch recess.)
10
Not from the Plaintiff.
All right.
Enjoy your lunch.
All rise.
CERTIFICATION
11
12
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a
13
true and correct transcript from the stenographic notes
14
of the proceedings in the above-entitled matter to the
15
best of our abilities.
16
17
18
/s/ Shea Sloan
SHEA SLOAN, CSR
19
Official Court Reporter
State of Texas No.:
20
Expiration Date:
3081
12/31/14
21
/s/ Judith Werlinger
22
JUDITH WERLINGER, CSR
Deputy Official Court Reporter
23
State of Texas No.:
Expiration Date
24
25
731
12/31/14
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?