WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filing
491
RESPONSE to Motion re 482 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law [RENEWED] OF NO INVALIDITY OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL ON INVALIDITY filed by Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Ericsson Inc., Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: Trial Transcript, # 2 Exhibit B: Trial Transcript, # 3 Exhibit C: Trial Transcript, # 4 Exhibit D: Trial Transcript, # 5 Exhibit E: Trial Transcript, # 6 Exhibit F: Trial Transcript, # 7 Exhibit G: Trial Transcript, # 8 Exhibit H: DDX 13-19, # 9 Exhibit I: DDX 13-31, # 10 Exhibit J: DX 124, # 11 Exhibit K: DX 148, # 12 Exhibit L: PX 1, # 13 Text of Proposed Order)(Heinlen, James)
EXHIBIT D
Page 1
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
2
3
WI-LAN, INC.
)
4
DOCKET NO. 6:10cv521
-vs-
5
6
7
8
9
10
)
Tyler, Texas
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC.,
1:12 p.m.
ET AL
)
July 10, 2013
******************************************************
WI-LAN, INC.
)
DOCKET NO. 6:13cv252
-vs)
HTC CORPORATION,
ET AL
)
11
12
13
14
15
TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL
AFTERNOON SESSION
BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONARD DAVIS,
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, AND A JURY
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
COURT REPORTERS:
MS. SHEA SLOAN
MS. JUDY WERLINGER
211 W. Ferguson
Tyler, Texas 75702
shea_sloan@txed.uscourts.gov
23
24
25
Proceedings taken by Machine Stenotype; transcript was
produced by a Computer.
Page 183
1
that was allocated by the FCC to the service providers
2
could be used to support lots of users all at once.
3
Q.
And at a high level, what are some of the
4
techniques that have been used to allow these multiple
5
transmissions to occur on the network?
6
7
A.
already.
8
9
10
Well, there's two that have been talked about
The first is code division multiple access.
That is the use of different codes by different users so
they can talk about the same time.
11
I think both parties in this case have used
12
the analogy of language.
13
English, one person is speaking Spanish, and another
14
speaking French, if you speak English, you might listen
15
in and you can pick out the English, even though several
16
people are talking at once.
17
If one person is speaking
If everyone is using a different code, you
18
listen for your code, and then you can sort it out, sort
19
out your message from everybody else that's talking.
20
21
Q.
Now, another technology we've heard about in
this case is time division multiplexing.
22
A.
That's right.
23
Q.
What is that?
24
A.
That's the equivalent of taking turns talking.
25
You know, the polite dinner party where everybody takes
Page 184
1
turns, and no one steps on anybody else.
2
So what we see here is a number of slots that
3
have been allocated to different users.
4
when his or her slot comes up.
5
speaks.
6
User 1 speaks
User 2 speaks.
User 3
And then they start over again.
So they each take turns, and the people on the
7
right side here know to listen for a specific slot, and
8
then they can follow their conversation.
9
Q.
So I want to just take a brief look under the
10
hood of these two technologies and just kind of dig in a
11
little more.
12
So first, let's talk about CDMA.
Could you
13
explain how CDMA actually operates to create these
14
different languages, as you suggested a moment ago?
15
A.
Okay.
Well, what CDMA does, if you'll take a
16
look at this figure, we have a lot of 0s and 1s that are
17
attended -- intended for several different users.
18
CDMA is going to take the bits that are intended for a
19
particular user and encode those bits with that user's
20
code.
21
So what I've used here are colors, different
22
shades of green; but what these codes really are, are
23
strings of 0s and 1s.
24
25
They're sequences or codes.
So the first user, this user here, that user
is going to receive bits that have been encoded with his
Page 187
1
2
3
4
5
A.
Yes.
They all set forth the problem towards
the beginning of the written description.
Q.
So what -- I'd like to talk about that, and
that problem is identified in the patents themselves?
A.
Yes.
6
7
8
9
MR. APPLEBY:
So let's turn to the next
slide.
Q.
(By Mr. Appleby) And if you could give us a
sense of what the patents tell us the problem was that
10
Airspan was looking at when it came up with these
11
inventions.
12
A.
Okay.
So this is in the part of the patent
13
that's called the background of the invention, but what
14
I'm specifically reading from is written down here.
15
I don't know if you can see that.
16
It's Column 1, Lines 45 -- Line 45 through Column 2,
17
Line 4.
18
I can barely see it.
And what it says is that we've got up to 16
19
separate communication signals.
20
signals.
21
our service, whatever it may be.
22
But we have a problem.
These happen to be CDMA
So we're supporting 16 different people with
And that problem is
23
that as more subscribers subscribe, we need more
24
channels.
25
We need to be able to support more people.
But we've got this situation in which we're
Page 188
1
stuck.
2
channels.
3
system so that it covers more people.
4
5
Q.
We've got 16 subscribers already and 16
So we have to have some way of expanding our
Now, do we have some slides illustrating this
problem?
6
A.
Yes.
7
Q.
So could you explain for us what we see here
8
9
in this slide?
A.
Okay.
The actual numbers, if you read that
10
part that I was pointing you to, it talks about 16 users
11
and then increasing to a much larger number.
12
was a lot of houses to be drawing and then 64, so I
13
changed the numbers a little bit.
14
Sixteen
So what I've got here are four subscribers
15
here, four houses; and they're supported by four codes,
16
which you see here.
17
One code/one house.
So each house is receiving its telephone
18
service, TV, cable, whatever the case may be, using its
19
assigned code.
20
And so at this point, everything is great,
21
because we've got four channels, four codes, and four
22
subscribers.
23
Q.
So what happens if we need to service more
24
subscribers than just the four that you had shown us
25
here on that slide?
Page 226
1
CERTIFICATION
2
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a
4
true and correct transcript from the stenographic notes
5
of the proceedings in the above-entitled matter to the
6
best of our abilities.
7
8
9
/s/ Shea Sloan
SHEA SLOAN, CSR
10
Official Court Reporter
State of Texas No.:
11
Expiration Date:
3081
12/31/14
12
13
/s/ Judith Werlinger
14
JUDITH WERLINGER, CSR
Deputy Official Court Reporter
15
State of Texas No.:
Expiration Date
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
731
12/31/14
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?