Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al
Filing
117
NOTICE by Microsoft Corp. DEFENDANT MICROSOFT CORPORATION'S NOTICE OF PTO ORDERS AND PATENT CLAIM REJECTIONS IN MICROSOFT'S REQUESTS FOR RE-EXAMINATION OF ANASCAPE PATENTS (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D)(Joncus, Stephen)
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al
Doc. 117
Case 9:06-cv-00158-RHC
Document 117
Filed 07/17/2007
Page 1 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ANASCAPE, LTD. Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Hon. Ron Clark Civil Action No. 9:06-CV-00158-RC
DEFENDANT MICROSOFT CORPORATION'S NOTICE OF PTO ORDERS AND PATENT CLAIM REJECTIONS IN MICROSOFT'S REQUESTS FOR RE-EXAMINATION OF ANASCAPE PATENTS Please take notice of the following recent actions by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") in the requests for re-examination filed by Microsoft against the asserted Anascape patents. On July 12, 2007, the PTO issued an Office Action rejecting all claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,102,802. (The PTO had granted Microsoft's request for re-examination of the `802 patent on March 9, 2007.) Litigation regarding this patent has not been stayed. A true and correct copy of the PTO Office Action is attached as Exhibit A. In the Office Action, the PTO finds that every claim of the `802 patent is not patentable, citing multiple different reasons for each claim. On July 13, 2007, the PTO granted Microsoft's request for the inter partes reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,906,700. Litigation regarding this patent has not been stayed. A true and correct copy of the PTO communication ordering re-examination is attached as Exhibit B. In the communication, the PTO agrees with Microsoft that twelve prior art references, including both prior art previously considered by the PTO as well as prior art not previously considered by the PTO, raise over forty substantial new questions of patentability for
MICROSOFT'S NOTICE OF PTO ORDERS AND PATENT CLAIM REJECTIONS IN MICROSOFT'S REQUESTS FOR RE-EXAMINATION OF ANASCAPE PATENTS
Page 1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 9:06-cv-00158-RHC
Document 117
Filed 07/17/2007
Page 2 of 5
the claims of the patent. See Exh. C, pp. 4, 6-11, 20. Additionally, after a lengthy analysis (see Ex. B, ¶¶ 8-24), the examiner stated that "the `700 Patent is not seen to be entitled to the priority date of the Armstrong `525 patent." (Ex. B, ¶ 24.) All claims of the `700 patent are now under inter partes re-examination. On June 4, 2007, the PTO granted Microsoft's request for the inter partes re-examination of U.S. Patent No. 6,563,415. Litigation regarding this patent is presently stayed. A true and correct copy of the PTO communication ordering re-examination is attached as Exhibit C. In the communication, the PTO agrees with Microsoft that eight prior art references, including both prior art previously considered by the PTO as well as prior art not previously considered by the PTO, raise substantial new questions of patentability for the claims of the patent. See Exh. C, pp. 2, 4-5. All claims of the `415 patent are now under inter partes re-examination. Also on June 4, 2007, the PTO granted Microsoft's request for the inter partes reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,351,205. Litigation regarding this patent is presently stayed. A true and correct copy of the PTO communication ordering re-examination is attached as Exhibit D. In the communication, the PTO agrees with Microsoft that seven prior art references, including both prior art previously considered by the PTO as well as prior art not previously considered by the PTO, raise substantial new questions of patentability for all asserted claims of the patent. See Exh. D, pp. 3-4. All asserted claims of the `205 patent are now under inter partes re-examination. The following chart identifies the current status of each of the re-examinations sought by
Microsoft for the twelve asserted patents. The six patents in bolded-underlined font are the ones
for which litigation has not been stayed:
MICROSOFT'S NOTICE OF PTO ORDERS AND PATENT CLAIM REJECTIONS IN MICROSOFT'S REQUESTS FOR RE-EXAMINATION OF ANASCAPE PATENTS
Page 2
Case 9:06-cv-00158-RHC
Document 117
Filed 07/17/2007
Page 3 of 5
Patent No. 5,999,084 6,102,802 6,135,886 6,222,525 6,343,991 6,906,700 6,208,271 6,344,791 6,347,997 6,351,205 6,400,303 6,563,415
Status of Re-examination Ex parte re-examination ordered. (2/23/07) All claims rejected. (7/12/07) Request for re-examination pending. Request for re-examination pending. Request for re-examination pending. Inter partes re-examination ordered. (7/13/07) Request for re-examination pending. Request for re-examination pending. Request for re-examination pending. Inter partes re-examination ordered. (6/15/07) Request for re-examination pending. Inter partes re-examination ordered. (6/4/07)
Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 17, 2007 By: /s/ Stephen J. Joncus ___________ J. Christopher Carraway (admitted pro hac vice) christopher.carraway@klarquist.com Joseph T. Jakubek (admitted pro hac vice) joseph.jakubek@klarquist.com Stephen J. Joncus (admitted pro hac vice) stephen.joncus@klarquist.com Richard D. Mc Leod (Bar No. 24026836) rick.mcleod@klarquist.com Derrick W. Toddy (admitted pro hac vice) derrick.toddy@klarquist.com KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: 503-595-5300 J. Thad Heartfield (Bar No. 09346800) thad@jth-law.com
MICROSOFT'S NOTICE OF PTO ORDERS AND PATENT CLAIM REJECTIONS IN MICROSOFT'S REQUESTS FOR RE-EXAMINATION OF ANASCAPE PATENTS
Page 3
Case 9:06-cv-00158-RHC
Document 117
Filed 07/17/2007
Page 4 of 5
Law Offices of J. Thad Heartfield 2195 Dowlen Road Beaumont, Texas 77706 Telephone: 409-866-3318 Facsimile: 409-866-5789 Clayton E Dark Jr. (Bar No. 05384500) cekrad@yahoo.com Clayton E Dark Jr., Law Office 207 E Frank Ave # 100 Lufkin, TX 75901 Telephone: 936-637-1733 Stephen McGrath, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) MICROSOFT CORPORATION One Microsoft Way, Building 8 Redmond, Washington 98052-6399 Telephone: 425-882-8080 Facsimile: 425-706-7329 Attorneys for Defendant Microsoft Corporation
MICROSOFT'S NOTICE OF PTO ORDERS AND PATENT CLAIM REJECTIONS IN MICROSOFT'S REQUESTS FOR RE-EXAMINATION OF ANASCAPE PATENTS
Page 4
Case 9:06-cv-00158-RHC
Document 117
Filed 07/17/2007
Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this the 17th day of July, 2007. Any other counsel of record will be served by first-class mail.
/s/ Stephen J. Joncus ___________
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?