Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al

Filing 417

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 415 Proposed Bill of Costs,.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit C Part 2, # 2 Exhibit C Part 3, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F)(Blank, James)

Download PDF
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al Doc. 417 Att. 5 H o w a r d K . S c h m i d t , Ph.n'. 20703 B r a M a n ! C r e e k Court Cypress. T X 7 1 4 3 3 ' PhoIJe: 713.348.4245 Email: bks@ricc.edu I~OICE H K s o 7 i u 9 A ~ due,upon r e c e i p t ~ 2 9 November, 2 0 0 7 , . L u k e Fleming M d . e r o y , E s q . Lead Attnmey. for AnaSGaPe McKooI Smith - Dallas 3 0 0 oescent Court, SUite 1 5 0 0 . Dallas, 1X 75201 s a m u e l Franklin B a x t e r , E s q . Lead Attorney rOr Anaseape , : Md<ool·smith.- Marshall POBoxO Marshall, 1X 7 5 6 7 1 Re: Via: . RECEIVED " ServiCes rendered as T~nicaf Advisor ~n case 9:06-<Y-00158-RHC· Post 8t. Eman: Imderoy@rndcI:1oIsmith.Com, ~@mckoo~ith.c::om NOV·Z 9 " -c "007 ' L Dear Sirs, ACCPUNTS PAYABLE : This tetter'will serve as my 'invoice for my s e r v l c e s as T~niqll Advisor t o Judge Ron cark In · case No. 9:96-cv-OO~58-RHC, Anascilpe '!So MJaosoft, e t al., The" period between 23 Aug~ a n d 2 2 $eptember, 2 0 0 7 IS'mverecf b y th~ invoice. The effort d u r i n g t h e period was d e v o t e d to matters related to the ' M l a t i s o f t and" Nintendo' patents,. Illducling the- hearing held on· 19 ·~ber. " . · '". ', " .: . DesaiDtiori Review·patents, court documents and ' pertlnent'extemallit:el:aW~; Date(s) 2007 through. . 2 2 Sep, 2 0 0 7 unitS 22.75 Rate 300 { hr . Ext. 22 Aug, $ 6,825.00 hrs 234m!. 0 . 4 8 5 / mI· 16.28. Total . $-113.49 ~ 16.28 2 2 Auaust. 2 0 0 7 2 2 AuQust 2 0 0 7 . MealSwhDe Consult with the court; attending h e a r i n g o n 19 Se "2001 Travel to h e a r i n a / · 2 3 4 miles -1 , » P o r t i o n t o Aoascape Poition to Microsoft Portion to Nlntendo " $ 6954;77 .. - " .....s3A77.39 ) ~1:R (. - n : .ng your finn for one-half o f the current charges, Ice, I am !nvola " ~ !eSS Texas, payable to ,Howard K. Scftn:IIdt, t o t h e address nOted above 77433. I wou~ appreciate your p r o m p t attention to :.#--: ' ~_ ·· ·· . _ _:_. .' ··· _ ~e ·· _ . : - _ ~y._.'A.F.-~~._.~:...~._.V;.u_ ' ~ ar ~!" f. 4~~ : ~ y_. p E "_ F1 Dockets.Justia.com · H o w a r d K. S c h m i d t , Ph.D. 20703 Bradford Creek C o m t Cypress, T X 77433 Phone: 713.348.4245 Email: bks@rice.edu I N V O I C E HKS080526C - d u e upon r e c e i p t 2 6 May, 2008 L a w r e n c e L o u i s G e r m e r , Esq. Lead Attorney f o r Nintendo Germer Gertz 550 Fannin St, Suite 400 Beaumont, 1 ) ( 7 7 7 0 1 Re: Vaa: Services rendered as Technical Advisor i n Case 9:06-cv-00158-RHC Email: llgermer@germer.com Dear Sirs, This Jetter will serve as my invoice for my services as Technical AdvIsor to J u d g e Ron Clark in case No. 9:06-cv-Q0158-RHC, Anascape vs. Microsoft, e t al., The pericxl between 1 December, 2007 and 1 May, 2 0 0 8 is covered b y t h i s invoice. T h e e f f o r t dUring t h e period w a s devoted t o m a t t e r s related to the ' M i c r o s o f t and Nintendo' patents. This is m y final invoice o n this matter. Description Review p a t e n t s , c o u r t d o c u m e n t s a n d pertinent extemalliterature; C o n s u l t w i t h the c o u r t Datees) Dec, 2007 1 through 1 May, 2008 Units 15 hrs Rate 300 I h r Ext. $ 4,500.00 Total P o r t i o n t o Anascaoe Portion to Microsoft $ 4 500.00 ~ » Portion t o Nintendo ....... As I n s t r u c t e d b y Judge O a r k s ' office, I a m invoicing y o u r firm for o n e - f o u r t h o f the c u r r e n t charges, $1,125.00. Please remit same, payable to Howard K. SChmidt, to the address noted above - 20703 Bradford Creek. Court, Cypress Texas, 77433. I would appreciate y o u r p r o m p t attention to this matter. -- 2,250.00 ~ 1,125.QA. I-$" ' 1 ; 1 2 5 . 0 0 J Sinrerely, /=-..-(I(a?f H o w a r d K. S C h m i d t , P h . D . '> F2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?