Armstrong v. United States Anti-Doping Agency et al

Filing 2

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Lance Armstrong. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Proposed Order)(Herman, Timothy)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
Lance Armstrong

Plaintiff,
v.

Civ. Action No. 1:12-CV-00606

United States Anti-Doping Agency, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
Based on the briefs, exhibits, other papers on file with the Court, and arguments made in
support of and in opposition to the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary
Injunction to Preserve the Status Quo filed by Plaintiff Lance Armstrong,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that:
1.

Defendants and their officers, agents, employees, and any individual or entity

acting in concert with them are HEREBY ENJOINED, pending final judgment, from initiating,
commencing, participating in, or otherwise enforcing arbitration of the June 12, 2012 and June
28, 2012 charges or imposing any sanctions specified therein.
2.

Defendants and their officers, agents, employees, and any individual or entity

acting in concert with them are HEREBY ENJOINED, pending final judgment from imposing
any sanction, cost, or fine on Mr. Armstrong or from taking any action with respect to
disqualification of competitive results held by Mr. Armstrong based on the allegations in the
June 12, 2012 and June 28, 2012 letters.

3.

Defendants and their agents, employees, appointees, and successors are

HEREBY ENJOINED, pending final judgment from taking any other action in furtherance of the
pursuit of doping charges, the imposition of sanctions or with respect to disqualification of
competitive results held by Mr. Armstrong based on the allegations in the June 12, 2012 and
June 28, 2012 letters.
4.

Defendants and their officers, agents, employees, and any individual or entity

acting in concert with them are HEREBY ENJOINED, pending final judgment from taking any
other action in furtherance of the pursuit of doping charges, the imposition of sanctions or with
respect to disqualification of competitive results held by Mr. Armstrong based on the allegations
in the June 12, 2012 and June 28, 2012 letters.
5.

There is no requirement of any bond and this injunctive relief is effective upon

service.
SIGNED this _________ day of _________, 2012.

__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE