SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
Filing
250
Stipulated MOTION to Amend/Correct SCO's Fifth Claim for Relief filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Sneddon, Heather)
SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
Doc. 250
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 250
Filed 03/20/2007
Page 1 of 3
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs, pro hac vice Kenneth W. Brakebill, pro hac vice 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 ANDERSON & KARRENBERG Thomas R. Karrenberg, #3726 John P. Mullen, #4097 Heather M. Sneddon, #9520 700 Chase Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: (801) 534-1700 Facsimile: (801) 364-7697 Attorneys for Defendant & Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff & CounterclaimDefendant, vs. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant & CounterclaimPlaintiff. Case No. 2:04CV00139 Judge Dale A. Kimball
STIPULATION RE SCO'S FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 250
Filed 03/20/2007
Page 2 of 3
Whereas Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant SCO pled a Fifth Claim for Relief for Unfair Competition in its Second Amended Complaint, filed February 3, 2006; Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell filed a Motion for a More Definite Statement of SCO's Unfair Competition Cause of Action ("Novell's Motion") on April 10, 2006; and SCO represented at the July 17, 2006 hearing on Novell's Motion that its Fifth Claim for Relief for Unfair Competition arises out of Utah law only; Consistent with SCO's representation, SCO's Second Amended Complaint is hereby deemed amended to reflect that SCO's Fifth Claim for Relief arises out of Utah statutory and/or common law and Novell's Motion is mooted. DATED: March 20, 2007 ANDERSON & KARRENBERG /s/ Heather M. Sneddon Thomas R. Karrenberg John P. Mullen Heather M. Sneddon Attorneys for Novell, Inc. DATED: March 20, 2007 HATCH, JAMES & DODGE /s/ Brent O. Hatch (Signed by filing attorney with permission of Brent O. Hatch) Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc.
2
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW
Document 250
Filed 03/20/2007
Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 20th day of March, 2007, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION RE SCO'S FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF to be served to the following: Via CM/ECF: Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James HATCH JAMES & DODGE, P.C. 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Stuart H. Singer William T. Dzurilla Sashi Bach Boruchow BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Edward J. Normand BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, New York 10504 Devan V. Padmanabhan John F. Brogan DORSEY & WHITNEY, LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Via U.S. Mail, postage prepaid: Stephen Neal Zack BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 100 Southeast Second Street, Suite 2800 Miami, Florida 33131
/s/ Heather M. Sneddon
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?