SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 250

Stipulated MOTION to Amend/Correct SCO's Fifth Claim for Relief filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Sneddon, Heather)

SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Doc. 250 Att. 1

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 250-2

Filed 03/20/2007

Page 1 of 2

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs, pro hac vice Kenneth W. Brakebill, pro hac vice 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] ANDERSON & KARRENBERG Thomas R. Karrenberg, #3726 John P. Mullen, #4097 Heather M. Sneddon, #9520 700 Chase Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant & Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff & CounterclaimDefendant, vs. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant & CounterclaimPlaintiff. Case No. 2:04CV00139 Judge Dale A. Kimball

ORDER RE SCO'S FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 250-2

Filed 03/20/2007

Page 2 of 2

Based upon the parties' Stipulation Re SCO's Fifth Claim for Relief, and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant SCO's Second Amended Complaint is deemed amended to reflect that SCO's Fifth Claim for Relief arises out of Utah statutory and/or common law and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell's Motion for a More Definite Statement of SCO's Unfair Competition Cause of Action is mooted. DATED: March _____, 2007 BY THE COURT:

______________________________________ Judge Dale A. Kimball United States District Court Judge Approved as to form: /s/ Brent O. Hatch (Signed by filing attorney with permission of Brent O. Hatch) Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc.

2