Incentive Capital v. Camelot Entertainment Group et al

Filing 35

MOTION To Require Appearance Of Party Witnesses At Hearing For Temporary Restraining Order And Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Incentive Capital. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pia, Joseph)

Joseph G. Pia (9945)
Nathan S. Dorius (8977)
PIA ANDERSON DORIUS REYNARD & MOSS
222 South Main Street, Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
INCENTIVE CAPITAL, LLC, a Utah Limited
Liability Company,
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
CAMELOT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP,
INC., a Delaware Corporation; CAMELOT
FILM GROUP, INC., a Nevada Corporation;
CAMELOT DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.,
a Nevada Corporation, ROBERT P. ATWELL,
an individual; JAMIE R. THOMPSON, an
individual; STEVEN ISTOCK, an individual;
TED BAER, an individual; PETER
JAROWEY, an individual,

Civil No. 2:11-cv-00288
Judge Clark Waddoups

Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Require Appearance of Party
Witnesses at Hearing for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Having

reviewed Plaintiff’s motion, having considered the arguments by counsel, and otherwise being
fully advised, the Court
HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES AS FOLLOWS:


A representative of each of the following Defendants is required to appear at the hearing
before this Court on May 12, 2011, at 3:30 P.M., for examination purposes: (1) Camelot
Film Group, Inc., (2) Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc., (3) Camelot Distribution
Group, Inc., (4) Robert Atwell, (5) Jamie Thompson, and (6) Steven Istock; or



At least one representative on Defendants’ behalf is required to appear at the hearing
before this Court on May 12, 2011, at 3:30 P.M., for examination purposes; or



In the Court’s discretion, hearsay evidence will be allowed due to the unavailability of
Defendants’ witnesses and based on governing principles allowing the introduction of
hearsay as evidence at preliminary injunction proceedings.

DATED this ____ day of May, 2011.
BY THE COURT:

_____________________________
The Honorable Clark Waddoups
United States District Court for the
District of Utah

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 11th day of May, 2011, I caused a true and correct copy of the
foregoing [PROPOSED] ORDER to be served as indicated below, upon the following:
Jonathan M. Levitan, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN MARK
LEVITAN
12400 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1300
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Michael O’Brien
VANCOTT BAGLEY
36 S. State St., Suite 1900
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Peter Jaroway
360 N Curson Ave. Apt 1
Los Angeles, CA 90036
[e-mail]
Ted Baer
21 E Canon Perdido St. #223
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
[e-mail]

☐ Sent via U.S. Mail
☐ Sent via Email
ý Sent via CMECF Filing
☐ Sent via U.S. Mail
☐ Sent via Email
ý Sent via CMECF Filing
ý Sent via U.S. Mail
ý Sent via Email
☐ Sent via CMECF Filing
ý Sent via U.S. Mail
ý Sent via Email
☐ Sent via CMECF Filing

/s/ Joseph G. Pia____________________________
Joseph G. Pia
Attorneys for Plaintiff

3