Isys Technologies v. Google et al

Filing 51

MOTION to Redact 46 Transcript,,,, 45 Transcript,,,, filed by Counter Claimant Google. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rossa, Thomas)

Peter J. Willsey (pro hac vice)
Brendan J. Hughes (pro hac vice)
COOLEY LLP
Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
777 6th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-3723
Telephone: [phone]; Facsimile: [phone]
Roger R. Myers (pro hac vice)
Thomas J. Rossa, #2806
Robert L. Stolebarger (pro hac vice)
HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP
Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
299 South Main Street, Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2263
Telephone: [phone]; Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., ACER
AMERICA CORP., AMAZON.COM, INC. and BEST BUY CO., INC.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
ISYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada
Corporation,

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-507 CW

Plaintiff,

MOTION TO REDACT HEARING
TRANSCRIPT

v.
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware Corporation;
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., a
Delaware Corporation; ACER AMERICA CORP.,
a California Corporation; AMAZON.COM, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation; and BEST BUY CO.,
INC., a Minnesota Corporation,

JUDGE CLARK WADDOUPS

Defendants.
Defendants Google Inc., Acer America Corp., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
(erroneously sued herein as Samsung Electronics USA, Inc.) (collectively, “Defendants”), by and
through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby move this Court for an order authorizing
redaction of certain portions of the transcript from the June 14, 2011 hearing on plaintiff’s
motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in the above-captioned case
-1#281597 v1 slc

(the “Transcript”).

Defendants’ motion is based on FRCP Rule 26(c), the accompanying

memorandum of authority, and the Redaction Request submitted herewith.
Pursuant to DUCivR5.2-1(c), Defendants filed a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction on
July 29, 2011. Defendants hereby request permission to redact from the Transcript references to
Defendants’ highly confidential business information, as reflected in the Redaction Request
submitted concurrently with this motion.
There is good cause to redact as requested because the information to be redacted is
confidential and sensitive business information, the release of which would damage Defendants.
The requested redactions are narrowly tailored to permit public access to the transcript with the
exception of only the limited portions that disclose Defendants’ highly confidential business
information.
DATED this 9th day of August, 2011.
/s/ Thomas J. Rossa
Roger R. Myers
Thomas J. Rossa
Robert L. Stolebarger
HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN, LLP
299 South Main Street, Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Attorneys for Defendants
Google Inc., Samsung Electronics USA, Inc., Acer America
Corp., Amazon.com, Inc., and Best Buy Co., Inc.
Peter J. Willsey
Brendan J. Hughes
COOLEY LLP
777 6th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-3723
Attorneys for Defendants
Google Inc., Acer America Corp., Amazon.com, Inc., and
Best Buy Co., Inc.

-2#281597 v1 slc