I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 795

Declaration re 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT of Dawn Rudenko, Esq. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
Exhibit 2 From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Sarah Agudo <sarahagudo@quinnemanuel.com> Wednesday, November 07, 2012 4:36 PM Albert, Dawn Rudenko; Monterio, Charles QE-IP Engine; Stephen E. Noona (senoona@kaufcan.com); zz-IPEngine; W. Ryan Snow (wrsnow@cwm-law.com); Donald C. Schultz (dschultz@cwm-law.com) RE: liP Engine v. AOL et al. Supplemental Interrogatory No. 15 Dawn, there is no basis in the verdict for your request. Regards, Sarah Sarah Agudo Associate Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 415-875-6402 Direct 415.875.6600 Main Office Number 415.875.6700 FAX sarahagudo@quinnemanuel.com www.quinnemanuel.com NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?