McCain-Palin 2008, Inc. v. Cunningham et al
Filing
47
Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y)(Perrin, Robin)
Exhibit X
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MCCAIN-PALIN 2008, INC., and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs, v. JEAN CUNNINGHAM, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the defendants' motion to dismiss the United States' complaint. For the reasons stated from the bench, the Court DENIES the defendants' motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated from the bench, the Court concludes that a settlement conference is appropriate. Counsel are DIRECTED to jointly contact the Chambers of the Honorable United States Magistrate Dennis W. Dohnal at 804-916-2270 within ten (10) days of the date of this Order to schedule a settlement conference. Counsel are ORDERED to have with them at the settlement
conference parties with settlement authority. Counsel are also ORDERED to determine what, if any, additional requirements, such as a settlement position brief, Judge Dohnal requires prior to the
Civil Action Number 3:08cv709
settlement conference. It is so ORDERED. Let the Clerk send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge Dennis W. Dohnal.
December 8, 2008 DATE
/s/ RICHARD L. WILLIAMS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?