Microsoft Corporation v. TIVO Inc

Filing 21

MOTION to Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659 and Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) by Defendant TIVO Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Staying Further Proceedings and Transferring Venue to the U.S. District Court for the N.D. of California) Noting Date 3/18/2011, (McWilliam, Jofrey)

Download PDF
Microsoft Corporation v. TIVO Inc Doc. 21 Att. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 // // // // v. TIVO INC., Defendant. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:11-cv-00134 RSM [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND TRANSFERING VENUE TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: FRIDAY, MARCH 18, 2011 THIS MATTER came before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659 and to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The Court having considered the pleadings offered in support of and in opposition to the motion, and being otherwise fully advised, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659 and to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the matter is [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND TRANSFERING VENUE TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (No. 2:11-cv-00134 RSM) - 1 38TH FLOOR 1000 SECOND AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 622-2000 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 hereby (1) STAYED until further order of the presiding court and (2) TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. DATED this ____ day of _____________________, 2011. THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ United States District Court Judge Presented by: BYRNES KELLER CROMWELL LLP By /s/ Jofrey M. McWilliam Bradley S. Keller, WSBA #10665 Jofrey M. McWilliam, WSBA #28441 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98104-4082 Phone: (206) 622-2000 Fax: (206) 622-2522 Email: bkeller@byrneskeller.com jmcwilliam@byrneskeller.com IRELL & MANELLA LLP 17 18 19 20 21 22 By: /s/ Joseph Lipner Joseph Lipner (pro hac vice) CA State Bar No. 155735 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Phone: (310) 277-1010 Fax: (310) 203-7199 Email: jlipner@irell.com Attorneys for Defendant 23 24 25 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND TRANSFERING VENUE TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (No. 2:11-cv-00134 RSM) - 2 38TH FLOOR 1000 SECOND AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 622-2000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned attorney certifies that on the 3rd day of March, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: Arthur W. Harrigan, Jr. (arthurh@dhlt.com) Christopher Wion (chrisw@dhlt.com) Shane P. Cramer (shanec@dhlt.com) Danielson Harrigan Leyh & Tollefson LLP 999 Third Avenue, Suite 4400 Seattle, WA 98104 T. Andrew Culbert (andycu@microsoft.com) Stacy Quan (stacy.quan@microsoft.com) Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052 Mark Davis (Mark.davis@weil.com) Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005-3314 Tim DeMasi (Tim.DeMasi@weil.com) Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153 /s/ Jofrey M. McWilliam Jofrey M. McWilliam Byrnes Keller Cromwell LLP 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98104-4082 Telephone: (206) 622-2000 Facsimile: (206) 622-2522 Email: jmcwilliam@byrneskeller.com [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND TRANSFERING VENUE TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (No. 2:11-cv-00134 RSM) - 3 38TH FLOOR 1000 SECOND AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 622-2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?