Hassert, Tom v. Navient Solutions, Inc.

Filing 30

Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Order, Judgment and Docket Sheet to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re: 28 Notice of Appeal, (Attachments: # 1 Order, # 2 Judgment, # 3 Docket Sheet) (lak)

ECF Western District of Wisconsin

1 of 4

https://ecf.wiwd.circ7.dcn/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?661045438849054-L_1_0-1

3015, APPEAL, CEW, CLOSED, PROTECTIVE_ORDER,

U.S. District Court
Western District of Wisconsin (Madison)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:16-cv-00243-jdp

Hassert, Thomas v. Navient Solutions, Inc.
Assigned to: District Judge James D. Peterson
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker
Cause: 47:0227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment

Date Filed: 04/15/2016
Date Terminated: 01/05/2017
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory
Actions
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Plaintiff
Thomas Hassert

represented by Michael S. Agruss
Agruss Law Firm, LLC
4809 N. Ravenswood Avenue
Ste. 419
Chicago, IL 60640
312-224-4695
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Samantha Anne Craig
Agruss Law Firm, LLC
4809 N. Ravenswood Avenue
Ste. 419
Chicago, IL 60640
312-224-4695
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Defendant
Navient Solutions, Inc.
f/k/a Sallie Mae, Inc.

represented by Joseph P. Campbell
Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart,
P.C.
1243 N. 10th Street
Suite 210
Milwaukee, WI 53205
414-239-6415
Fax: [phone]

2/6/2017 4:00 PM

ECF Western District of Wisconsin

2 of 4

https://ecf.wiwd.circ7.dcn/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?661045438849054-L_1_0-1

Email:
[e-mail]
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed
04/15/2016

#

Docket Text
1 COMPLAINT against Navient Solutions, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number
0758-1790428.), filed by Tom Hassert. (Attachments:
# 1 Summons,
# 2 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet) (Agruss, Michael) (Entered: 04/15/2016)

04/15/2016

Case randomly assigned to District Judge James D. Peterson and Magistrate Judge
Stephen L. Crocker. (jls) (Entered: 04/15/2016)

04/15/2016

Standard attachments for Judge James D. Peterson required to be served on all
parties with summons or waiver of service: NORTC, Corporate Disclosure
Statement. (jls) (Entered: 04/15/2016)

04/15/2016

2 Summons Issued as to Navient Solutions, Inc. (jls) (Entered: 04/15/2016)

04/15/2016

3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Tom Hassert. (Agruss, Michael)
(Entered: 04/15/2016)

04/21/2016

4 Summons Returned Executed. Navient Solutions, Inc. served on 4/21/2016, answer
due 5/12/2016. (Agruss, Michael) (Entered: 04/21/2016)

04/27/2016

5 Notice of Appearance filed by Joseph P. Campbell for Defendant Navient Solutions,
Inc. (Campbell, Joseph) (Entered: 04/27/2016)

05/09/2016

6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re: 1 Complaint by
Defendant Navient Solutions, Inc. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L.
Crocker. (Attachments:
# 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Campbell, Joseph) (Entered: 05/09/2016)

05/09/2016

7 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **
ORDER granting 6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Navient Solutions, Inc.
answer due 6/13/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/9/2016.
(jls) (Entered: 05/09/2016)

06/10/2016

8 Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re: 1 Complaint by Defendant
Navient Solutions, Inc. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker.
Response due 6/17/2016. (Attachments:
# 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Campbell, Joseph) (Entered: 06/10/2016)

06/10/2016

9 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **
ORDER granting 8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. It is unlikely the court
would grant any third request for an extension of this deadline. Navient Solutions,
Inc. answer due 6/27/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on
6/10/2016. (jls) (Entered: 06/10/2016)

2/6/2017 4:00 PM

ECF Western District of Wisconsin

3 of 4

https://ecf.wiwd.circ7.dcn/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?661045438849054-L_1_0-1

06/27/2016

10 ANSWER by Defendant Navient Solutions, Inc. (Campbell, Joseph) (Entered:
06/27/2016)

06/27/2016

11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Navient Solutions, Inc.. (Campbell,
Joseph) (Entered: 06/27/2016)

06/28/2016

Set Telephonic Pretrial Conference: Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 7/27/2016
at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. Counsel for Plaintiff
responsible for setting up the call to chambers at [phone]. [Standing Order
Governing Preliminary Pretrial Conference attached] (jls) (Entered: 06/28/2016)

06/29/2016

12 Notice of Appearance filed by Samantha Anne Craig for Plaintiff Tom Hassert.
(Craig, Samantha) (Entered: 06/29/2016)

07/21/2016

13 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Craig, Samantha) (Entered: 07/21/2016)

07/27/2016

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker:
Telephone Preliminary Pretrial Conference held on 7/27/2016 [:05] (cak) (Entered:
07/27/2016)

08/01/2016

14 Pretrial Conference Order - Amendments to Pleadings due 8/31/2016. Dispositive
Motions due 3/20/2017. Settlement Letters due 7/10/2017. Motions in Limine due
7/14/2017. Response to Motion due 7/28/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for
8/9/2017 at 04:00 PM. Jury Selection and Trial set for 8/14/2017 at 09:00 AM.
Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 7/29/2016. (jls) (Entered:
08/01/2016)

08/31/2016

15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Navient Solutions, Inc., filed by Thomas Hassert.
(Agruss, Michael) Modified on 9/1/2016. (lak) (Entered: 08/31/2016)

09/13/2016

16 MOTION TO DISMISS by Defendant Navient Solutions, Inc. Brief in Opposition
due 10/13/2016. Brief in Reply due 10/28/2016. (Campbell, Joseph) (Entered:
09/13/2016)

09/13/2016

17 Brief in Support of 16 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Navient Solutions, Inc.,
(Attachments:
# 1 Exhibit 1 - Unredacted Promissory Note (Sealed) (Campbell, Joseph) Modified
on 9/13/2016. (lak) (Entered: 09/13/2016)

09/16/2016

18 Stipulated Motion for Protective Order by Defendant Navient Solutions, Inc.,
(Attachments:
# 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Campbell, Joseph) (Entered: 09/16/2016)

09/16/2016

19 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **
The parties' proposed stipulated protective order is accepted and entered as the
court's own order in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on
9/16/2016. (jls) (Entered: 09/16/2016)

10/12/2016

20 Exhibit/Redaction to 17 Brief in Support filed by Navient Solutions, Inc. Redacted
Promissory Note (Campbell, Joseph) Modified on 10/13/2016: Linked to the correct
document. (lak) (Entered: 10/12/2016)

10/13/2016

21 Brief in Opposition by Plaintiff Thomas Hassert re: 16 Motion to Dismiss filed by
Navient Solutions, Inc., (Attachments:

2/6/2017 4:00 PM

ECF Western District of Wisconsin

4 of 4

https://ecf.wiwd.circ7.dcn/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?661045438849054-L_1_0-1

# 1 Exhibit A - BBA Order) (Craig, Samantha) Modified on 10/14/2016. (lak)
(Entered: 10/13/2016)
10/28/2016

22 Brief in Reply by Defendant Navient Solutions, Inc. in Support of 16 Motion to
Dismiss. (Campbell, Joseph) (Entered: 10/28/2016)

11/18/2016

23 Joint Motion to Stay Discovery by Plaintiff Thomas Hassert. Response due
11/28/2016. (Attachments:
# 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Craig, Samantha) (Entered: 11/18/2016)

11/21/2016

24 ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **
At the July 27, 2016 telephonic preliminary pretrial conference, the court set the
entire schedule for this case (see dkt. 14 ), providing the parties with the quick dates
they had jointly requested (see dkt. 13 ), then set the dispositive motion filing
deadline for March 20, 2017, with jury selection and trial to follow on August 14,
2017. On August 31, 2016, plaintiff filed an amended complaint (dkt. 15 ), which
defendant moved to dismiss on September 13, 2016 (dkt. 16 ), with the last brief
being filed on October 28, 2016 (see dkt. 22 ). On November 18, 2016, the parties
filed a joint motion (dkt. 23 ) to stay discovery because the court has not yet ruled on
the motion to dismiss. There is no need for the court to "stay" discovery because the
parties are free to call a time-out on their own, and if they wish, to extend the
January 18, 2017 cutoff without the court's imprimatur. See dkt. 14 at Par. # 3. The
parties should keep in mind, however, that the summary judgment motion filing
deadline and the trial date remain firmly in place regardless how they choose to
approach discovery. Accordingly, the joint motion to stay discovery is denied as
unnecessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/21/2016. (jls)
(Entered: 11/21/2016)

01/05/2017

25 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson
on 1/5/2017. (jls) (Entered: 01/05/2017)

01/06/2017

26 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendant Navient Solutions, Inc. dismissing the
case. (jls) (Entered: 01/06/2017)

02/03/2017

27 Disregard. Refiled as 28 . Modified on 2/6/2017. (lak) (Entered: 02/03/2017)

02/06/2017

28 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL by Plaintiff Thomas Hassert as to 26 Judgment.
Filing fee of $ 505, receipt number 0758-1964995 paid. No Docketing Statement
filed. (Craig, Samantha) Modified on 2/6/2017. (lak) (Entered: 02/06/2017)

02/06/2017

29 Appeal Information Packet. (lak) (Entered: 02/06/2017)

2/6/2017 4:00 PM