Van Cannon v. USA

Filing 21

Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Docketing Statement, Order, Judgment and Docket Sheet to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re: 18 Notice of Appeal, (Attachments: # 1 Docketing Statement, # 2 Order, # 3 Judgment, # 4 Docket Sheet) (lak)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN _____________________________________________________________ JERRY VAN CANNON, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. Case No. 16-cv-433 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. _____________________________________________________________ NOTICE OF APPEAL Jerry Van Cannon, by counsel, hereby gives notice pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 3(c) & 4(a)(1)(B) that he appeals the order and judgment denying his petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which was imposed on July 10, 2017, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, the Honorable Barbara B. Crabb presiding. Mr. Van Cannon takes this appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The district court issued a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 & Fed. R. App. P. 22(b), authorizing this appeal, in the same order denying the § 2255 petition. With this notice of appeal, Mr. Van Cannon also files the docketing statement required by Circ. Rule 3 (7th Cir.), combined with a Cir. Rule 26.1 disclosure statement. Mr. Van Cannon also files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. FEDERAL DEFENDER SERVICES OF WISCONSIN, INC. Dated at Madison, Wisconsin this 11th day of August, 2017. Respectfully submitted, Jerry Van Cannon, Petitioner /s/ Shelley M. Fite Shelley M. Fite FEDERAL DEFENDER SERVICES OF WISCONSIN, INC. 22 East Mifflin Street, Suite 1000 Madison, WI 53703 Tel: 608-260-9900 Fax: 608-260-9901 shelley_fite@fd.org 2 FEDERAL DEFENDER SERVICES OF WISCONSIN, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?