Adams et al v. Austal, U.S.A., L.L.C.

Filing 515

Order on Jury Trial. This action came before the Court for jury selection on August 30, 2011, and trial by jury beginning September 26, 2011 and ending October 5, 2011, with United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose presiding. On October 5, 2011 , the jury having heard the evidence, the arguments of counsel, the charge of the Court and having considered the same upon their oaths, deliberated and returned with the verdicts as stated (attached).. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/17/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Adams Verdict, # 2 Barnes Verdict, # 3 Carter Verdict, # 4 Hedgeman Verdict, # 5 Johnson Verdict) (mca)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION EARATON ADAMS, MYRON BARNES, FREDERICK CARTER, SIDNEY HEDGEMAN and CARLOS JOHNSON, Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) V. ctvtL AcTtoN 08-00155-KD-N ) ) ) ) AUSTAL U.S.A., L.L.C., Defendant. EARATON ADAMS VERDTCT l. Hostile Work Environment 1. Do you find for Earaton Adams or Austal USA on Adams' ctaim of hostile work environment? Earaton Adams Austal, USA ll. Failure to Promote 2. Do you find for Earaton Adams or Austal USA on Adams' claim of failure to promote? Earaton Adams Austaf, USA l,/ lf you find for Earaton Adams in Question #1 or #2, then answer #4. lf you did not find for Earaton Adams in Question #1 or #2, stop and sign this Verdict Form and then proceed to the next Questions #3 and Plaintiff's verd ict form. lll. Damaqes 3. Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that Adams should be awarded compensatory damages? YES NO lf you answered Yes, in what amount? 4. Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that Adams should be awarded punitive damages? YES NO lf you answered Yes, in what amount? SO SAY WE ALL, FdREPERSON DATED: /O " S" / / FILED IN OPEN COURT THIS THE DAY OF OCTOBER,2O1l. scr.. DEPUTY CLERK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?