Adams et al v. Austal, U.S.A., L.L.C.
Filing
515
Order on Jury Trial. This action came before the Court for jury selection on August 30, 2011, and trial by jury beginning September 26, 2011 and ending October 5, 2011, with United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose presiding. On October 5, 2011 , the jury having heard the evidence, the arguments of counsel, the charge of the Court and having considered the same upon their oaths, deliberated and returned with the verdicts as stated (attached).. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/17/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Adams Verdict, # 2 Barnes Verdict, # 3 Carter Verdict, # 4 Hedgeman Verdict, # 5 Johnson Verdict) (mca)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
EARATON ADAMS,
MYRON BARNES,
FREDERICK CARTER,
SIDNEY HEDGEMAN and
CARLOS JOHNSON,
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
v.
ctvtL AcTtoN 08-00155-KD-N
)
)
)
)
AUSTAL U.S.A., L.L.C.,
Defendant.
MYRON BARNES VERDICT
l.
Hostile Work Environment
1.
Do you find for Myron Barnes or Austal USA on Barnes' ctaim of
hostile work environment?
Myron Barnes
Austal, USA
ll.
Failure to Promote
2-
Do you find for Myron Barnes or Austal USA on Barnes' claim of
failure to promote?
Myron Barnes
Austal,
USA l/
lll. Retaliation
3. Do you find for Myron Barnes or Austal
retaliation?
Myron Barnes
USA on Barnes' claim of
Austal,
USA '\/
ff you find for Myron Barnes in Question #1 , #2 or #3, then answer
Questions {*4 and #5. lf you did not find for Myron Barnes in Question #1,
#2 or #3, stop and sign this Verdict Form and then proceed to the next
Plaintiff's verdict form.
lV. Damases
4.
Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that Barnes
should be awarded compensatory damages?
YES
NO
lf you answered Yes, in what amount?
5.
Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that Barnes
should be awarded punitive damages?
YES
NO
lf you answered Yes, in what amount?
2
SO SAY WE ALL,
FOREPERSON
DATED:
lO
"'-S - 77
FILED IN OPEN COURT THIS THE
6-t't-' DAY OF OCTOBER,2OIi.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?