Adams et al v. Austal, U.S.A., L.L.C.

Filing 515

Order on Jury Trial. This action came before the Court for jury selection on August 30, 2011, and trial by jury beginning September 26, 2011 and ending October 5, 2011, with United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose presiding. On October 5, 2011 , the jury having heard the evidence, the arguments of counsel, the charge of the Court and having considered the same upon their oaths, deliberated and returned with the verdicts as stated (attached).. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/17/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Adams Verdict, # 2 Barnes Verdict, # 3 Carter Verdict, # 4 Hedgeman Verdict, # 5 Johnson Verdict) (mca)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRTCT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION

EARATON ADAMS,
MYRON BARNES,
FREDERICK CARTER,
SIDNEY HEDGEMAN and
CARLOS JOHNSON,

Plaintiffs,
v.

AUSTAL U.S.A., L.L.C.,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ctvtl AcTtoN 08-001 55-KD-N

)
)

Defendant.

)

SIDNEY HEDGEMAN VERDICT

l.

Hostile Work Environment

1. Do you find for sidney Hedgeman or Austal usA on Hedgeman's
claim of hostile work environment?
Sidney Hedgeman

Austaf,

USA

l/

lf you find for Sidney Hedgeman in Question #1, then answer

Questions#2 and #3. lf you did not flnd for Sidney Hedgeman in Question
#1, stop and sign this Verdict Form and then proceed to the next Plaintiff's
verdict form.

ll.

Damaqes

2.

Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that Hedgeman
should be awarded compensatory damages?
YES

NO

lf you answered Yes, in what amount?

3.

Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that Hedgeman
should be awarded punitive damages?
YES

NO

lf you answered Yes, in what amount?

SO SAY WE ALL,

FOREPERSON

DATED:

/o' 5 //

FILED IN OPEN COURT THIS THE
DAY oF ocroBER, 20i1.
,<*

(

ev,

ry\-(,.".

C,{qlp

DEPUTY CLERKU

2

a