Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 657

Declaration of Zachary J. Alinder in Support of 649 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed byOracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34, # 35 Exhibit 35, # 36 Exhibit 36, # 37 Exhibit 37, # 38 Exhibit 38, # 39 Exhibit 39, # 40 Exhibit 40, # 41 Exhibit 41, # 42 Exhibit 42, # 43 Exhibit 43, # 44 Exhibit 44, # 45 Exhibit 45, # 46 Exhibit 46, # 47 Exhibit 47, # 48 Exhibit 48, # 49 Exhibit 49, # 50 Exhibit 50, # 51 Exhibit 51, # 52 Exhibit 52, # 53 Exhibit 53, # 54 Exhibit 54 - 1, # 55 Exhibit 54 - 2, # 56 Exhibit 55, # 57 Exhibit 56, # 58 Exhibit 57, # 59 Exhibit 58, # 60 Exhibit 59, # 61 Exhibit 60, # 62 Exhibit 61, # 63 Exhibit 62, # 64 Exhibit 63, # 65 Exhibit 64, # 66 Exhibit 65, # 67 Exhibit 66, # 68 Exhibit 67, # 69 Exhibit 68, # 70 Exhibit 69, # 71 Exhibit 70, # 72 Exhibit 71, # 73 Exhibit 72, # 74 Exhibit 73, # 75 Exhibit 74, # 76 Exhibit 75, # 77 Exhibit 76, # 78 Exhibit 77, # 79 Exhibit 78, # 80 Exhibit 79, # 81 Exhibit 80, # 82 Exhibit 81, # 83 Exhibit 82, # 84 Exhibit 83, # 85 Exhibit 84, # 86 Exhibit 85, # 87 Exhibit 86, # 88 Exhibit 87, # 89 Exhibit 88, # 90 Exhibit 89, # 91 Exhibit 90, # 92 Exhibit 91, # 93 Exhibit 92, # 94 Exhibit 93, # 95 Exhibit 94, # 96 Exhibit 95, # 97 Exhibit 96, # 98 Exhibit 97, # 99 Exhibit 98, # 100 Exhibit 99, # 101 Exhibit 100, # 102 Exhibit 101, # 103 Exhibit 102, # 104 Exhibit 103, # 105 Exhibit 104, # 106 Exhibit 105, # 107 Exhibit 106, # 108 Exhibit 107, # 109 Exhibit 108, # 110 Exhibit 109, # 111 Exhibit 110, # 112 Exhibit 111, # 113 Exhibit 112, # 114 Exhibit 113, # 115 Exhibit 114, # 116 Exhibit 115, # 117 Exhibit 116, # 118 Exhibit 117)(Related document(s) 649 ) (Howard, Geoffrey) (Filed on 3/3/2010)

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Doc. 657 Att. 36

Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document657-37

Filed03/03/10 Page1 of 5

EXHIBIT 37
Dockets.Justia.com

Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document657-37

Filed03/03/10 Page2 of 5

1 2

3

4 5
6

7
8 9
10

B I N G H A M M c C U T C H E N LLP D O N N P. P I C K E T T ( S B N 72257) G E O F F R E Y M. H O W A R D ( S B N 157468) HOLL Y A. H O U S E ( S B N 136045) Z A C H A R Y 1. A L I N D E R (SBN 209009) B R E E H A N N (SBN 215695) Three E m b a r c a d e r o C e n t e r San F r a n c i s c o , C A 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 3 9 3 - 2 0 0 0 F a c s i m i l e : (415) 3 9 3 - 2 2 8 6 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] D O R I A N D A L E Y ( S B N 129049) J E N N I F E R G L O S S ( S B N 154227) 500 Oracle Parkway, MIS 50p7 R e d w o o d City, C A 9 4 0 7 0 T e l e p h o n e : (650) 5 0 6 - 4 8 4 6 Facsimile: (650) 5 0 6 - 7 1 1 4 [e-mail] [e-mail] A t t o r n e y s for P l a i n t i f f s O r a c l e U S A , Inc., O r a c l e I n t e r n a t i o n a l Corp., O r a c l e E M E A L t d . , and Siebel Systems, Inc.

JONES D A Y R O B E R T A. M I T T E L S T A E D T ( S B N 0 6 0 3 5 9 ) J A S O N M c D O N E L L ( S B N 115084) E L A I N E W A L L A C E ( S B N 197882) th 555 California Street, 2 6 Floor S a n Francisco, C A 94104 Telephone: (415) 6 2 6 - 3 9 3 9 Facsimile: (415) 8 7 5 - 5 7 0 0 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] JONES D A Y T H A R A N G R E G O R Y L A N I E R ( S B N 138784) J A N E L. F R O Y D (SBN 220776) 1755 Embarcadero R o a d P a l o A l t o , C A 94303 Telephone: (650) 7 3 9 - 3 9 3 9 Facsimile: (650) 7 3 9 - 3 9 0 0 [e-mail] [e-mail] JONES D A Y S C O T T W. C O W A N (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) J O S H U A L. F U C H S (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 7 1 7 Texas, S u i t e 3300 Houston, T X 77002 Telephone: (832) 2 3 9 - 3 9 3 9 Facsimile: (832) 2 3 9 - 3 6 0 0 [e-mail] [e-mail] A t t o r n e y s for D e f e n d a n t s S A P A G , S A P A m e r i c a , Inc., a n d TomorrowNow, Inc.

11
12
13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

U N I T E D STATES D I S T R I C T C O U R T N O R T H E R N D I S T R I C T OF C A L I F O R N I A OAKLAND DIVISION O R A C L E USA, INC., e t aI., Plaintiffs, v. SAP AG, e t aI., C a s e No. 0 7 - C V - 1 6 5 8 P J H (EDL) STIPULATION RE ADMISSIBILITY OF TN DATABASES

23
24 25

Defendants. 26 27 28
C a s e No. 0 7 - C Y - 1 6 5 8 PJH (EDL)

STIPULAn O N RE ADMISSIBILITY OF T N DATABASES

Ex 37 - Page 1

Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document657-37

Filed03/03/10 Page3 of 5

1 2 3 4

P l a i n t i f f s O r a c l e U S A , I n c . , O r a c l e I n t e r n a t i o n a l C o r p o r a t i o n , O r a c l e E M E A Ltd., a n d S i e b e l S y s t e m s , Inc. ( " O r a c l e " ) a n d D e f e n d a n t s S A P A G , S A P A m e r i c a , I n c . , a n d T o m o r r o w N o w , Inc. ( " T o m o r r o w N o w , " a n d t o g e t h e r w i t h S A P A G a n d S A P A m e r i c a , I n c . , " D e f e n d a n t s , " a n d all t o g e t h e r w i t h O r a c l e , t h e " P a r t i e s " ) j o i n t l y s u b m i t t h i s s t i p u l a t i o n

5
6
7

.regarding the admissibility o f certain evidence in the above-referenced case (the "Action").
The Parties hereby stipulate a n d agree as follows: 1. In response to a n u m b e r o f Interrogatories served by Oracle, Defendants have

8 9 10
11

relied o n several databases used b y T o m o r r o w N o w employees pursuant to Federal Rule o f Civil Procedure 33(d) ( " Ru l e 33(d)"), including databases known as SAS, BakTrak, dotProject and Pathfinder.
2.

D e f e n d a n t s h a v e p r o d u c e d t o O r a c l e the f o l l o w i n g B a t e s - l a b e l e d p r o d u c t i o n s

12
13

containing certain records from SAS o n or about the dates indicated ("SAS Productions"): TNOR00004202 - September 2 1 , 2 0 0 7 ; TN-OR00005145 - October 5, 2007; T N - O R 0 0 0 0 9 5 5 6 N o v e m b e r 9, 2007; TN-OR00009569 - D e c e m b e r 4 , 2 0 0 7 ; TN-OROOI69313 - December 27, 2007; T N - O R 0 0 8 7 1 9 0 1 - F e b r u a r y 1 4 , 2 0 0 8 ; T N - O R 0 0 8 7 1 9 0 2 - F e b r u a r y 1 4 , 2 0 0 8 ; TNOR01823633 - J u n e 1 1 , 2 0 0 8 ; T N - O R 0 3 7 2 7 3 7 4 - January 2 0 , 2 0 0 9 ; T N - O R 0 3 7 7 5 4 7 8 February 1 3 , 2 0 0 9 ; TN-OR04446717 - March 4 , 2 0 0 9 ; TN-OR03727374 - March 6, 2009; TNOR03775478 - M a r c h 6, 2009; and TN-OR04446719 - March 6, 2009. 3. D e f e n d a n t s h a v e p r o d u c e d t o O r a c l e the f o l l o w i n g B a t e s - l a b e l e d p r o d u c t i o n s

14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

c o n t a i n i n g c e r t a i n r e c o r d s from B a k T r a k o n o r a b o u t the dates i n d i c a t e d ( " B a k T r a k P r o d u c t i o n s " ) : TN-OROlO05523 - M a r c h 1 2 , 2 0 0 8 ; T N - O R 0 1 8 1 8 6 2 8 - M a y 1 , 2 0 0 8 ; a n d T N O R 0 6 1 2 5 3 3 0 - A p r i l 2 0 , 2009.
4.

Defendants have produced to Oracle the following Bates-labeled productions

c o n t a i n i n g c e r t a i n r e c o r d s from d o t P r o j e c t o n o r a b o u t t h e d a t e s i n d i c a t e d ( " d o t P r o j e c t Productions"): TN-ORO 1361344 - March 2 6 , 2 0 0 8 ; and TN-OR06220764 - May 8, 2009. 5. D e f e n d a n t s have p r o d u c e d t o O r a c l e the f o l l o w i n g B a t e s - l a b e l e d p r o d u c t i o n s

c o n t a i n i n g c e r t a i n r e c o r d s from P a t h f i n d e r o n o r a b o u t t h e d a t e s i n d i c a t e d ( " P a t h f i n d e r Productions"): T N - O R 0 4 4 9 8 7 1 2 - March 2 5 , 2 0 0 9 . 1

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

STIPULATION RE ADMISSIBILITY OF TN DATABASES

Ex 37 - Page 2

Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document657-37

Filed03/03/10 Page4 of 5

1

6.

D e f e n d a n t s p r o d u c e d t h e SAS P r o d u c t i o n s , B a k T r a k P r o d u c t i o n s , d o t P r o j e c t

2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11

Productions, and Pathfinder Productions (together, the " N a t i v e Database Productions") in native electronic form, and Defendants represent that the Native Database Productions provide Oracle with the same functionality, usability, and l o o k a n d feel available to T o m o r r o w N o w employees using t h e original v e r s i o n s o f s u c h databases. 7. F o r a n y s c r e e n s h o t , p r i n t o u t , o r n a t i v e e l e c t r o n i c d e m o n s t r a t i o n or p r e s e n t a t i o n o f

any r e c o r d , a t t a c h m e n t , o r o t h e r v i e w o r d a t a c o n t a i n e d i n a N a t i v e D a t a b a s e P r o d u c t i o n o f f e r e d by any Party i n m o t i o n practice, trial, or any other proceeding o r filing in the Action, and for w h i c h t h a t P a r t y c a n d e m o n s t r a t e t h e m a n n e r a n d m e t h o d i n w h i c h s u c h screenshot, printout, o r n a t i v e e l e c t r o n i c d e m o n s t r a t i o n o r p r e s e n t a t i o n w a s g e n e r a t e d from a N a t i v e D a t a b a s e Production ("Native Database Exhibit"), the Parties agree as follows: a. N a t i v e D a t a b a s e E x h i b i t s shall b e d e e m e d a u t h e n t i c f o r the p u r p o s e s o f

12
13

F e d e r a l R u l e s o f E v i d e n c e ( " F R E " ) 901;

14
15

b.

Any content o f a Native Database Exhibit that does not on its face contain any

o b j e c t i v e i n d i c i a t h a t s u c h c o n t e n t is e i t h e r a d i r e c t s t a t e m e n t o f a t h i r d p a r t y o r a v e r b a t i m r e c i t a l or p a r a p h r a s i n g o f a s t a t e m e n t o f a t h i r d p a r t y , s h a l l n o t b e h e a r s a y under F R E 801 and 802; a n d c. Non-hearsay content o f Native Database Exhibits shall be admissible for the

16
17 18

19
20

purpose o f attempting to establish any fact requested by any Interrogatory served by Oracle for which Defendants rely o n the underlying Native Database Production in t h e i r r e s p o n s e p u r s u a n t to R u l e 3 3 ( d ) . 8. A n y f u t u r e p r o d u c t i o n b y D e f e n d a n t s o f i n f o r m a t i o n c o p i e d from a n y v e r s i o n o f

21
22 23 24
2S

SAS, BakTrak, dotProject, or Pathfinder ever used or maintained by T o m o r r o w N o w shall also be considered a Native Database Production for the purposes o f this Stipulation. 9. This Stipulation is in no way intended to limit the purposes for which SAS,

26
27

BakTrak, dotProject, P a t h f i n d e r , the N a t i v e D a t a b a s e P r o d u c t i o n s , o r N a t i v e D a t a b a s e E x h i b i t s may b e used or offered into evidence by any Party in the Action, and all Parties expressly reserve t h e i r r i g h t s w i t h r e s p e c t t o the a d m i s s i b i l i t y o f a n y i n f o r m a t i o n from SAS, B a k T r a k , dotProject,
2
Case No. 07-CV-1658 P l H (EDL)

28

S T I P U L A n O N R E ADMISSI13ILITY O F T N D A T A B A S E S

Ex 37 - Page 3

Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document657-37

Filed03/03/10 Page5 of 5

1 2 3 4

o r P a t h f i n d e r for a n y p u r p o s e . A n y s t a t e m e n t s i n t h i s S t i p u l a t i o n r e g a r d i n g w h a t specific e v i d e n c e is a g r e e d t o b e c o n s i d e r e d n o n - h e a r s a y shall n o t b e u s e d as a b a s i s to imply, infer or establish t h a t any o t h e r offered e v i d e n c e is either non-hearsay, h e a r s a y o r a n e x c e p t i o n to the h e a r s a y rules.
10.

5
6 7

This S t i p u l a t i o n shall i n no w a y affect a n y P a r t y ' s right u n d e r the Stipulated

P r o t e c t i v e O r d e r t o s e e k t o c l a w b a c k u n d e r a c l a i m o f p r i v i l e g e all o r a n y p o r t i o n o f a n y N a t i v e D a t a b a s e Exhibits t h a t m a y b e offered into e v i d e n c e for a n y p u r p o s e i n this case., 11. One o f t h e c o n d i t i o n s inducing D e f e n d a n t s into entering into this stipulation is

8
9 10

P l a i n t i f f s ' a g r e e m e n t t o e n t e r i n t o a n s u b s t a n t i a l l y e q u i v a l e n t , p a r a l l e l s t i p u l a t i o n for s i m i l a r types o f d o c u m e n t s a n d d a t a f r o m databases relating to P l a i n t i f f s ' day-to-day business operations

u t h a t P l a i n t i f f s have r e l i e d o n u n d e r R u l e 33(d) i n r e s p o n d i n g t o D e f e n d a n t s ' interrogatories. 12 13 14 15 16 Similarly, D e f e n d a n t s a g r e e to e n t e r into substantially equivalent, parallel stipulations for similar types o f d o c u m e n t s a n d d a t a f r o m o t h e r o f t h e i r o w n d a t a b a s e s r e l a t i n g to D e f e n d a n t s ' day-tod a y b u s i n e s s o p e r a t i o n s t h a t t h e y r e l y o n o r w i l l r e l y on u n d e r R u l e 3 3 ( d ) . T h e e x a c t t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s o f any s u c h future s t i p u l a t i o n s s h a l l b e t h e s u b j e c t o f n e g o t i a t i o n b e t w e e n t h e P a r t i e s , a n d i f n e c e s s a r y , u l t i m a t e r e s o l u t i o n by J u d g e Laporte.

17

I T IS S O S T I P U L A T E D .

18 19
D A T E D : O c t o b e r 30, 2 0 0 9
By:.--{-----.;....A'I--I-:,.,--,---=-!----bi'+l-------"~ _ f f r e y M. o w a r d A t t o r n e y s for Plaintiffs O r a c l e U S A , Inc., O r a c l e I n t e r n a t i o n a l C o r p o r a t i o n , O r a c l e E M E A , Ltd., a n d Siebel S y s t e m s , Inc.

20
21 22

23
JONES DAY

24
DATED: ,2009

25

26
27

By: -----------------Tharan Gregory Lanier A t t o r n e y s for D e f e n d a n t s S A P A G , S A P A m e r i c a , Inc., a n d T o m o r r o w N o w , Inc.

28

3

Case No. 07-CY-1658 PJH (EDL)

STIPULATION RE ADMISSIBILITY OF TN DATABASES

Ex 37 - Page 4