Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 199

Declaration of Daniel Purcell in Support of #198 Reply to Opposition/Response Daubert Motion filed byGoogle Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Related document(s) #198 ) (Purcell, Daniel) (Filed on 7/5/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065
[e-mail]
CHRISTA M. ANDERSON - #184325
[e-mail]
DANIEL PURCELL - #191424
[e-mail]
710 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

KING & SPALDING LLP
SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
ROBERT F. PERRY
[e-mail]
BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-4003
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

KING & SPALDING LLP
DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. (SBN 112279)
[e-mail]
CHERYL A. SABNIS (SBN 224323)
[e-mail]
101 Second Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
IAN C. BALLON (SBN 141819)
[e-mail]
HEATHER MEEKER (SBN 172148)
[e-mail]
1900 University Avenue, Fifth Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

Case No. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

20

Plaintiff,

21

v.

22

REPLY DECLARATION OF DANIEL
PURCELL IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE
INC.’S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
DAUBERT MOTION

GOOGLE INC.,

23

Defendant.

24
25
26
27
28

567059.01

REPLY DECLARATION OF DANIEL PURCELL
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA

1

I, Daniel Purcell, declare as follows:

2

I am a partner in the law firm of Keker & Van Nest LLP, counsel to Google Inc. in the

3

present case. I submit this declaration in support of Google Inc.’s Reply Brief in Support of

4

Daubert Motion. I make this declaration based on my own personal knowledge. If called as a

5

witness, I could and would testify competently to the matters set forth herein.

6

1.

Attached to this declaration as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Oracle

7

America’s First Supplemental Response to Google’s Request for Production of Documents (No.

8

22), served by Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) on April 8, 2011.

9
10
11

2.

Attached to this declaration as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of excerpts of

the transcript of the Videotaped Deposition of Robert Griesemer, dated June 23, 2011.
3.

Attached to this declaration as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of Oracle

12

America, Inc.’s Responses and Objections to Defendant Google Inc.’s First Set of Requests for

13

Production to Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc. (Nos. 1-65), served by Oracle on January 6, 2011.

14

4.

Attached to this declaration as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of Chapter 3 of

15

Economic Approaches to Intellectual Property Policy, Litigation, and Management, edited by

16

Dr. Gregory K. Leonard and Dr. Lauren J. Stiroh.

17

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing facts are true and correct.

18

Executed on July 5, 2011 in San Francisco, California.

19
/s/ Daniel Purcell /s/
Daniel Purcell

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

REPLY DECLARATION OF DANIEL PURCELL
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA