Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 199

Declaration of Daniel Purcell in Support of #198 Reply to Opposition/Response Daubert Motion filed byGoogle Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Related document(s) #198 ) (Purcell, Daniel) (Filed on 7/5/2011)

Exhibit A

1
2
3
4
5

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664)
[e-mail]
MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725)
[e-mail]
DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 209624)
[e-mail]
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone]

6
7
8
9
10
11

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone]
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177)
[e-mail]
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone]

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

ORACLE CORPORATION
DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049)
[e-mail]
DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600)
[e-mail]
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.

19
20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

22

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

23

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.

24

Plaintiff,

25

v.

26

GOOGLE INC.

27

Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA
ORACLE AMERICA’S FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL
RESPONSE TO GOOGLE’S REQUEST FOR
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (NO. 22)
Dept.: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor
Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup

Defendant.

28
ORACLE’S 1ST SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO GOOGLE’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS NO. 22
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
pa-1456496

1

PROPOUNDING PARTY:

Defendant GOOGLE INC.

2

RESPONDING PARTY:

Plaintiff ORACLE AMERICA, INC.

3

SET ONE (NOS. 1-65):

First Supplemental Response No. 22

4

Pursuant to Rules 33 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Oracle

5

America, Inc. (“Oracle”) hereby submits the following supplemental response to No. 22 of

6

Defendant Google Inc.’s (“Google”) First Set of Requests for Production of Documents

7

(“Request”).

8

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 22:

9

Documents and Things sufficient to identify any intellectual property rights that are

10

essential to practice each release of each Java specification.

11

FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 22:

12

Oracle is unaware of any responsive documents that can be found in its possession,

13

custody, or control with reasonable efforts. If Oracle becomes aware of any non-privileged,

14

responsive documents in its possession, custody, or control through reasonable efforts, it will

15

produce them.

16
17

Oracle objects to this request to the extent it encompasses documents and information
protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege or the attorney work-product doctrine.

18
19
20

Dated: April 8, 2011

MICHAEL A. JACOBS
MARC DAVID PETERS
DANIEL P. MUINO
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

21
22
23
24

By: /s/ Marc David Peters
Marc David Peters
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.

25
26
27
28
ORACLE’S 1ST SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO GOOGLE’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS NO. 22
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
pa-1456496

1

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

I declare that I am employed with the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, whose address
is 755 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304-1018. I am not a party to the within cause,
and I am over the age of eighteen years.

3
4

I further declare that on April 8, 2011, I served a copy of:

5

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF ORACLE AMERICA, INC. (NO. 22)

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. rule 5(b)] by electronically
mailing a true and correct copy through Morrison & Foerster LLP's electronic mail
system to the e-mail address(es) set forth below, or as stated on the attached service
list per agreement in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule 5(b).
Robert F. Perry
Scott T. Weingaertner
Bruce W. Baber
Mark H. Francis
Christopher C. Carnaval
KING & SPALDING LLP
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-4003
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Timothy T. Scott
Geoffrey M. Ezgar
Leo Spooner III
KING & SPALDING, LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

[e-mail]
Donald F. Zimmer, Jr.
Cheryl Z. Sabnis
KING & SPALDING LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94105

Steven Snyder
KING & SPALDING LLP
100 N. Tryon Street, Suite 3900
Charlotte, NC 28202
[e-mail]

[e-mail]
[e-mail]

24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
pa-1418284

1

1
2

Renny F. Hwang
GOOGLE INC.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043

3

Ian C. Ballon
Heather Meeker
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP
1900 University Avenue, 5th Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303

[e-mail]
4

[e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6
7

Joseph R. Wetzel
Dana K. Powers
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
153 Townsend Street, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94107

8
9

[e-mail]
[e-mail]

10
11
12

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
true and correct.
Executed at Palo Alto, California, this 8th day of April, 2011.

13
14
15
16

Cynthia D. Fix
(typed)

/s/ Cynthia D. Fix
(signature)

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
pa-1418284

2