Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

Filing 153

DECLARATION of Perry Clark in Opposition to 152 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed byPetroliam Nasional Berhad. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20 (Part 1 of 3), # 22 Exhibit 20 (Part 2 of 3), # 23 Exhibit 20 (Part 3 of 3))(Related document(s) 152 ) (Clark, Perry) (Filed on 12/9/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Ex. 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CLARK DECL. ISO OPP. SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç 1 2 3 4 5 Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ï ±º íì Perry R. Clark, Esq. Law Offices of Perry R. Clark 3457 Cowper St. Palo Alto, CA 94306 Telephone: (650) 248-5817 Facsimile: (650) 248-5816 perry@perryclarklaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. PETRONASTOWERS.NET, an internet domain name, 15 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: 10-CV-03052 PJH Date: September 15, 2010 Time: 9:00 a.m. Location: Courtroom 3 Third Floor 16 17 18 19 20 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 21 22 23 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH OPPAPP000102 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç 1 I. 2 Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»î ±º íì NOTICE OF MOTION TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: Please take notice that Plaintiff 3 Petroliam Nasional Berhad (“Plaintiff” or “Petronas”) will and hereby does makes this motion 4 for an order transferring the domain name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” to Plaintiff Petronas 5 pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) and for entry of judgment. Please further take notice of the 6 hearing date for this motion: September 15, 2010 at 9 a.m. 7 II. 8 9 STATEMENT OF RELIEF REQUESTED Plaintiff Petronas requests that this Court issue an order directing GoDaddy.Com, Inc. to transfer the domain name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” to Plaintiff Petronas pursuant to 15 10 U.S.C. § 1125(D). Plaintiff Petronas further requests an order entering final judgment in 11 Petronas’s favor in this action. On July 12, 2010, Plaintiff Petronas informed the registrant of 12 the internet domain name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” of its intent to pursue this action at the 13 physical and email addresses provided GoDaddy and as required by 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D). Ex. 14 A. Plaintiff Petronas has not received any communication from the registrant as of the date of 15 this motion. Plaintiff Petronas also has served a copy of the motion and supporting papers as set 16 forth in declaration of service attached as Ex. B on the registrant and counsel for the domain 17 name registrar, GoDaddy.com, Inc. Plaintiff Petronas is unaware of any person or entity that 18 does, or would, oppose the motion. 19 20 III. MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION The “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name should be transferred to Plaintiff 21 Petronas under the Anticyberpiracy section of the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 22 1125(D)(2). A court may issue an order transferring a domain name pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 23 1125(D)(2) where: (1) the domain name “violates any right of the owner of a mark registered in 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH ï OPPAPP000103 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»í ±º íì 1 the Patent and Trademark Office,” 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D)(2)(A)(i), (2) the owner of the mark “is 2 not able obtain in personam jurisdiction over a person who would have been a defendant in a 3 civil action [for cybersquatting] under [15 U.S.C. § 1125(D)] paragraph (1),” 15 U.S.C. § 4 1125(D)(2)(A)(ii)(I), and (3) the domain name registrar “deposit[s] with the court documents 5 sufficient to establish the court’s control and authority regarding the disposition of the 6 registration and use of the domain name,” 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D)(2)(D). Because all three of the 7 foregoing requirements are met with respect to the domain name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET,” 8 an order transferring the domain name to Petronas should issue in this case. 9 10 A. “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” Infringes the Trademark Rights of Petronas There can be no dispute that the first requirement for the transfer of the 11 “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain under the Anticyberpiracy section of the Lanham Act— 12 that the domain name infringes the trademark rights of Petronas—is met in this case. 13 Specifically, the Anticyberpiracy section applies to any domain name “that violates any right of 14 the owner of a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office, or protected under subsection 15 (a) [false designation of origin] or (c) [dilution] [of 15 U.S.C. § 1125].” 15 U.S.C. § 16 1125(d)(2)(A)(i). 17 Here, the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name violates the rights of Petronas 18 with respect to its federally registered “PETRONAS” mark because it infringes that mark under 19 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) and (c). As an initial matter, Petronas is the owner of the duly registered 20 federal trademark for the mark “PETRONAS.” Ex. C. In addition, the 21 “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name infringes the “PETRONAS” mark under 15 U.S.C. 22 § 1114 because the domain name is “a use in commerce” of the “PETRONAS” mark that is 23 “likely to cause confusion” among consumers as to whether the pornographic website using the 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH î OPPAPP000104 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ì ±º íì 1 “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name is associated with Petronas—which it is not. 2 Automotive Gold, Inc. v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 457 F.3d 1062, 1075-76 (9th Cir. 2006). 3 Moreover, the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name violates the rights of Petronas under 4 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) by creating a “false designation of origin” as to the pornographic website 5 found at the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name because that site did not “originate” 6 with Petronas and, in fact, Petronas strongly objects to the site and its use of “PETRONAS.” 7 New West Corp. v. N.Y.M. Co. of California, 595 F.2d 1194, 1201 (9th Cir. 1979) (“Whether we 8 call the violation infringement, unfair competition, or false designation of origin, the test is 9 identical—is there a likelihood of confusion?”). 10 Accordingly, the first requirement for the transfer of the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” 11 domain name to Petronas under the Anticyberpiracy section of the Lanham is met because that 12 domain name infringes the trademark rights of Petronas. 13 B. In Personam Jurisdiction Is Unavailable As To The Registrant of “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” 14 15 The second requirement for the transfer of “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” to Petronas is 16 met because in a civil action under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d) the court would not have had in 17 personam jurisdiction over the registrant of the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name. 18 According to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I), an in rem action for the transfer of a domain name 19 is proper where “the owner [of the mark] . . . is not able to obtain in personam jurisdiction over a 20 person who would have been a defendant in a civil action [for cybersquatting] under [15 U.S.C. 21 § 1125(d)] paragraph (2).” 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I). 22 23 Here, according to records of the registrar of the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name (GoDaddy.com), the domain name was registered by “Heiko Schonenekess” whose 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH í OPPAPP000105 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ë ±º íì 1 address is “BPM 195226, 372 Old Street, London, Ec1V 9AU, United Kingdom.” Ex. D. The 2 internet registrant also provided an email address: “cc_ltd@live.com.” Although Plaintiff 3 Petronas tried repeatedly to locate and contact the registrant, including by Federal Express and 4 email, it was unable to do so. Petronas was also unable to identify any grounds for the exercise 5 of personal jurisdiction over the registrant. The registrant of the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” 6 domain name would be liable as a defendant in action for cybersquatting under 15 U.S.C. § 7 1125(d). Because the registrant of the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain could not be 8 subjected to in personam jurisdiction, the second requirement of the Anticyberpiracy section has 9 been met with respect to the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name. 10 C. The Domain Registrar (GoDaddy) Certifies This Court’s Authority Over the Domain Name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” 11 12 GoDaddy is the registrar of the domain name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” and, as 13 required by the Anitcyberpiracy section, has provided certification that this Court has the 14 “control and authority” to transfer the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name to Petronas. 15 Specifically, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2)(D)(i) provides that, upon the filing of an Anticyberpiracy 16 action, “the domain name registrar . . . shall expeditiously deposit with the court documents 17 sufficient to establish the court’s control and authority regarding the disposition of the 18 registration and use of the domain name to the court.” GoDaddy provided this information to 19 Petronas and it is being filed along with this motion. Ex. E. As a result, all of the requirements 20 for an order directing GoDaddy to transfer the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name to 21 Petronas under the Anticyberpiracy section have been met. 22 23 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH ì OPPAPP000106 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ê ±º íì 1 D. 2 In this action, Plaintiff Petronas seeks an order transferring the Entry of Judgment 3 “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name. Upon the issuance of such an order, the Court will 4 have granted complete relief to Petronas and entry of judgment will be proper under Fed. R. Civ. 5 P. 54. Accordingly, Plaintiff Petronas requests that in addition to an order transferring the 6 “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name, the Court also issue final judgment in favor of 7 Petronas. 8 9 IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff Petronas respectfully requests an order directing 10 GoDaddy.com to transfer the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name to Petronas and the 11 entry of judgment in favor of Petronas. A proposed order and proposed final judgment are being 12 filed with this motion. 13 Dated: August 10, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK 14 15 By: 16 17 /s/ Perry R. Clark Perry R. Clark . Attorney for Plaintiff PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH ë OPPAPP000107 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»é ±º íì 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ex. A 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH OPPAPP000108 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»è ±º íì LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK 3457 Cowper St. PALO ALTO, CA 94306 TELEPHONE: 650 248 5817 FACSIMILE: 650 618 8533 July 12, 2010 By Electronic Mail and Federal Express Heiko Schoenekess BPM 195226 372 Old Street London EC1V 9AU United Kingdom Re: “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” DOMAIN NAME To Whom It May Concern: Please take notice that your registration of the domain name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” is a violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) and that we intend to proceed as counsel for Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) pursuant to that section as set forth in the enclosed complaint. We also have provided this notice to you by electronic mail at the email address (“cc_ltd@live.com”) maintained by GoDaddy.com, Inc., the registrar of “PETRONASTOWERS.NET.” Best Regards, Perry Clark OPPAPP000109 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ç ±º íì OPPAPP000110 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ï𠱺 íì OPPAPP000111 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïï ±º íì OPPAPP000112 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïî ±º íì OPPAPP000113 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïí ±º íì OPPAPP000114 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïì ±º íì OPPAPP000115 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïë ±º íì OPPAPP000116 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïê ±º íì Page 1 39 of 99 DOCUMENTS UNITED STATES CODE SERVICE Copyright © 2010 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. a member of the LexisNexis Group (TM) All rights reserved. *** CURRENT THROUGH PL 111-198, WITH A GAP OF PL 111-195, APPROVED 7/2/2010 *** TITLE 15. COMMERCE AND TRADE CHAPTER 22. TRADEMARKS GENERAL PROVISIONS Go to the United States Code Service Archive Directory 15 USCS § 1125 Review expert commentary from The National Institute for Trial Advocacy preceding 15 USCS § 1051. THE CASE NOTES SEGMENT OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN SPLIT INTO 2 DOCUMENTS. THIS IS PART 1. USE THE BROWSE FEATURE TO REVIEW THE OTHER PART(S). § 1125. False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden (a) Civil action. (1) Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which-(A) is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, orapproval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person, or (B) in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person's goods, services, or commercial activities, shall be liable in a civil action by any person who believes that he or she is or is likely to be damaged by such act. (2) As used in this subsection, the term "any person" includes any State, instrumentality of a State or employee of a State or instrumentality of a State acting in his or her official capacity. Any State, and any such instrumentality, officer, or employee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Act in the same manner and to the same extent as any nongovernmental entity. (3) In a civil action for trade dress infringement under this Act for trade dress not registered on the principal register, the person who asserts trade dress protection has the burden of proving that the matter sought to be protected is not functional. (b) Importation. Any goods marked or labeled in contravention of the provisions of this section shall not be imported OPPAPP000117 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïé ±º íì Page 2 15 USCS § 1125 into the United States or admitted to entry at any customhouse of the United States. The owner, importer, or consignee of goods refused entry at any customhouse under this section may have any recourse by protest or appeal that is given under the customs revenue laws or may have the remedy given by this Act in cases involving goods refused entry or seized. (c) Dilution by blurring; dilution by tarnishment. (1) Injunctive relief. Subject to the principles of equity, the owner of a famous mark that is distinctive, inherently or through acquired distinctiveness, shall be entitled to an injunction against another person who, at any time after the owner's mark has become famous, commences use of a mark or trade name in commerce that is likely to cause dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment of the famous mark, regardless of the presence or absence of actual or likely confusion, of competition, or of actual economic injury. (2) Definitions. (A) For purposes of paragraph (1), a mark is famous if it is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark's owner. In determining whether a mark possesses the requisite degree of recognition, the court may consider all relevant factors, including the following: (i) The duration, extent, and geographic reach of advertising and publicity of the mark, whether advertised or publicized by the owner or third parties. (ii) The amount, volume, and geographic extent of sales of goods or services offered under the mark. (iii) The extent of actual recognition of the mark. (iv) Whether the mark was registered under the Act of March 3, 1881, or the Act of February 20, 1905, or on the principal register. (B) For purposes of paragraph (1), "dilution by blurring" is association arising from the similarity between a mark or trade name and a famous mark that impairs the distinctiveness of the famous mark. In determining whether a mark or trade name is likely to cause dilution by blurring, the court may consider all relevant factors, including the following: (i) The degree of similarity between the mark or trade name and the famous mark. (ii) The degree of inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the famous mark. (iii) The extent to which the owner of the famous mark is engaging in substantially exclusive use of the mark. (iv) The degree of recognition of the famous mark. (v) Whether the user of the mark or trade name intended to create an association with the famous mark. (vi) Any actual association between the mark or trade name and the famous mark. (C) For purposes of paragraph (1), "dilution by tarnishment" is association arising from the similarity between a mark or trade name and a famous mark that harms the reputation of the famous mark. (3) Exclusions. The following shall not be actionable as dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment under this subsection: (A) Any fair use, including a nominative or descriptive fair use, or facilitation of such fair use, of a famous mark by another person other than as a designation of source for the person's own goods or services, including use in connection with-(i) advertising or promotion that permits consumers to compare goods or services; or (ii) identifying and parodying, criticizing, or commenting upon the famous mark owner or the goods or services of the famous mark owner. (B) All forms of news reporting and news commentary. (C) Any noncommercial use of a mark. (4) Burden of proof. In a civil action for trade dress dilution under this Act for trade dress not registered on the principal register, the person who asserts trade dress protection has the burden of proving that-(A) the claimed trade dress, taken as a whole, is not functional and is famous; and (B) if the claimed trade dress includes any mark or marks registered on the principal register, the unregistered matter, taken as a whole, is famous separate and apart from any fame of such registered marks. (5) Additional remedies. In an action brought under this subsection, the owner of the famous mark shall be entitled to injunctive relief as set forth in section 34. The owner of the famous mark shall also be entitled to the remedies set forth in sections 35(a) and 36 [15 USCS § 1117(a) and 1118], subject to the discretion of the court and the principles of OPPAPP000118 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïè ±º íì Page 3 15 USCS § 1125 equity if-(A) the mark or trade name that is likely to cause dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment was first used in commerce by the person against whom the injunction is sought after the date of enactment of the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 [enacted Oct. 6, 2006]; and (B) in a claim arising under this subsection-(i) by reason of dilution by blurring, the person against whom the injunction is sought willfully intended to trade on the recognition of the famous mark; or (ii) by reason of dilution by tarnishment, the person against whom the injunction is sought willfully intended to harm the reputation of the famous mark. (6) Ownership of valid registration a complete bar to action. The ownership by a person of a valid registration under the Act of March 3, 1881, or the Act of February 20, 1905, or on the principal register under this Act shall be a complete bar to an action against that person, with respect to that mark, that-(A) (i) is brought by another person under the common law or a statute of a State; and (ii) seeks to prevent dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment; or (B) asserts any claim of actual or likely damage or harm to the distinctiveness or reputation of a mark, label, or form of advertisement. (7) Savings clause. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to impair, modify, or supersede the applicability of the patent laws of the United States. (d) Cyberpiracy prevention. (1) (A) A person shall be liable in a civil action by the owner of a mark, including a personal name which is protected as a mark under this section, if, without regard to the goods or services of the parties, that person-(i) has a bad faith intent to profit from that mark, including a personal name which is protected as a mark under this section; and (ii) registers, traffics in, or uses a domain name that-(I) in the case of a mark that is distinctive at the time of registration of the domain name, is identical or confusingly similar to that mark; (II) in the case of a famous mark that is famous at the time of registration of the domain name, is identical or confusingly similar to or dilutive of that mark; or (III) is a trademark, word, or name protected by reason of section 706 of title 18, United States Code, or section 220506 of title 36, United States Code. (B) (i) In determining whether a person has a bad faith intent described under subparagraph (A), a court may consider factors such as, but not limited to-(I) the trademark or other intellectual property rights of the person, if any, in the domain name; (II) the extent to which the domain name consists of the legal name of the person or a name that is otherwise commonly used to identify that person; (III) the person's prior use, if any, of the domain name in connection with the bona fide offering of any goods or services; (IV) the person's bona fide noncommercial or fair use of the mark in a site accessible under the domain name; (V) the person's intent to divert consumers from the mark owner's online location to a site accessible under the domain name that could harm the goodwill represented by the mark, either for commercial gain or with the intent to tarnish or disparage the mark, by creating a likelihood of confusion as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the site; (VI) the person's offer to transfer, sell, or otherwise assign the domain name to the mark owner or any third party for financial gain without having used, or having an intent to use, the domain name in the bona fide offering of any goods or services, or the person's prior conduct indicating a pattern of such conduct; (VII) the person's provision of material and misleading false contact information when applying for the registration of the domain name, the person's intentional failure to maintain accurate contact information, or the person's OPPAPP000119 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïç ±º íì Page 4 15 USCS § 1125 prior conduct indicating a pattern of such conduct; (VIII) the person's registration or acquisition of multiple domain names which the person knows are identical or confusingly similar to marks of others that are distinctive at the time of registration of such domain names, or dilutive of famous marks of others that are famous at the time of registration of such domain names, without regard to the goods or services of the parties; and (IX) the extent to which the mark incorporated in the person's domain name registration is or is not distinctive and famous within the meaning of subsection (c). (ii) Bad faith intent described under subparagraph (A) shall not be found in any case in which the court determines that the person believed and had reasonable grounds to believe that the use of the domain name was a fair use or otherwise lawful. (C) In any civil action involving the registration, trafficking, or use of a domain name under this paragraph, a court may order the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark. (D) A person shall be liable for using a domain name under subparagraph (A) only if that person is the domain name registrant or that registrant's authorized licensee. (E) As used in this paragraph, the term "traffics in" refers to transactions that include, but are not limited to, sales, purchases, loans, pledges, licenses, exchanges of currency, and any other transfer for consideration or receipt in exchange for consideration. (2) (A) The owner of a mark may file an in rem civil action against a domain name in the judicial district in which the domain name registrar, domain name registry, or other domain name authority that registered or assigned the domain name is located if-(i) the domain name violates any right of the owner of a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office, or protected under subsection (a) or (c); and (ii) the court finds that the owner-(I) is not able to obtain in personam jurisdiction over a person who would have been a defendant in a civil action under paragraph (1); or (II) through due diligence was not able to find a person who would have been a defendant in a civil action under paragraph (1) by-(aa) sending a notice of the alleged violation and intent to proceed under this paragraph to the registrant of the domain name at the postal and e-mail address provided by the registrant to the registrar; and (bb) publishing notice of the action as the court may direct promptly after filing the action. (B) The actions under subparagraph (A)(ii) shall constitute service of process. (C) In an in rem action under this paragraph, a domain name shall be deemed to have its situs in the judicial district in which-(i) the domain name registrar, registry, or other domain name authority that registered or assigned the domain name is located; or (ii) documents sufficient to establish control and authority regarding the disposition of the registration and use of the domain name are deposited with the court. (D) (i) The remedies in an in rem action under this paragraph shall be limited to a court order for the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark. Upon receipt of written notification of a filed, stamped copy of a complaint filed by the owner of a mark in a United States district court under this paragraph, the domain name registrar, domain name registry, or other domain name authority shall-(I) expeditiously deposit with the court documents sufficient to establish the court's control and authority regarding the disposition of the registration and use of the domain name to the court; and (II) not transfer, suspend, or otherwise modify the domain name during the pendency of the action, except upon order of the court. (ii) The domain name registrar or registry or other domain name authority shall not be liable for injunctive or monetary relief under this paragraph except in the case of bad faith or reckless disregard, which includes a willful failure to comply with any such court order. OPPAPP000120 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»î𠱺 íì Page 5 15 USCS § 1125 (3) The civil action established under paragraph (1) and the in rem action established under paragraph (2), and any remedy available under either such action, shall be in addition to any other civil action or remedy otherwise applicable. (4) The in rem jurisdiction established under paragraph (2) shall be in addition to any other jurisdiction that otherwise exists, whether in rem or in personam. HISTORY: (July 5, 1946, ch 540, Title VIII, § 43, 60 Stat. 441; Nov. 16, 1988, P.L. 100-667, Title I, § 132, 102 Stat. 3946; Oct. 27, 1992, P.L. 102-542, § 3(c), 106 Stat. 3568; Jan. 16, 1996, P.L. 104-98, § 3(a), 109 Stat. 985; Aug. 5, 1999, P.L. 106-43, §§ 3(a)(2), 5, 113 Stat. 219, 220; Nov. 29, 1999, P.L. 106-113, Div B, § 1000(a)(9), 113 Stat. 1536.) (As amended Oct. 6, 2006, P.L. 109-312, § 2, 120 Stat. 1730.) HISTORY; ANCILLARY LAWS AND DIRECTIVES References in text: Acts March 3, 1881 and February 20, 1905, referred to in this section, are Acts March 3, 1881, ch 130, 22 Stat. 388, and Feb. 20, 1905, ch 592, 33 Stat. 724, which were repealed insofar as inconsistent with 15 USCS §§ 1051 et seq. by Act July 5, 1946, ch 540, § 46(a), 60 Stat. 444. Act Feb. 20, 1905, formerly appeared as 15 USCS §§ 81 et seq.. "This Act", referred to in this section, is Act July 5, 1946, ch 540, 60 Stat. 427, which is popularly known as the Lanham Act or the Trademark Act of 1946, and which appears generally as 15 USCS §§ 1051 et seq. For full classification of such Act, consult USCS Tables volumes. Explanatory notes: Similar provisions were contained in Act March 19, 1920, ch 104, § 3, 41 Stat. 534. The amendment made by § 1000(a)(9) of Act Nov. 29, 1999, P.L. 106-113, is based on § 3002(a) of Title III of S. 1948 (113 Stat. 1501A-545), as introduced on Nov. 17, 1999, which was enacted into law by such § 1000(a)(9). Effective date of section: This section takes effect one year from its enactment, as provided by Act July 5, 1946, ch 540, § 46, 60 Stat. 444, which appears as 15 USCS § 1051 note. Amendments: 1988. Act Nov. 16, 1988 (effective one year after enactment as provided by § 136 of such Act, which appears as 15 USCS § 1051 note) substituted subsec. (a) for one which read: "(a) Any person who shall affix, apply, or annex, or use in connection with any goods or services, or any container or containers for goods, a false designation of origin, or any false description or representation, including words or other symbols tending falsely to describe or represent the same, and shall cause such goods or services to enter into commerce, and any person who shall with knowledge of the falsity of such designation of origin or description or representation cause or procure the same to be transported or used in commerce or deliver the same to any carrier to be transported or used, shall be liable to a civil action by any person doing business in the locality falsely indicated as that of origin or in the region in which said locality is situated, or by any person who believes that he is or is likely to be damaged by the use of any such false description or representation.". OPPAPP000121 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îï ±º íì 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ex. B 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH OPPAPP000122 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç 1 2 3 4 5 Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îî ±º íì Perry R. Clark, Esq. Law Offices of Perry R. Clark 3457 Cowper St. Palo Alto, CA 94306 Telephone: (650) 248-5817 Facsimile: (650) 248-5816 perry@perryclarklaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. PETRONASTOWERS.NET, an internet domain name, 15 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH OPPAPP000123 CASE NO: 10-CV-03052 PJH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç 1 Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îí ±º íì I, Perry Clark, state that I served Plaintiff’s NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR 2 ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND 3 FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT all exhibits thereto (“Motion”) as follows: 4 1. I placed a copy of the motion in a Federal Express envelope with postage pre-paid 5 for FedEx Express addressed to: 6 Heiko Schonenekess 7 BPM 195226 8 372 Old Street 9 London Ec1V 9AU 10 United Kingdom 11 Tel.: +44.2076636606 12 2. 13 I deposited the Federal Express envelope identified in Paragraph 1 (above) in a Federal Express drop box on August 10, 2010. 14 3. I emailed a pdf copy of the motion to “cc_ltd@live.com” on August 10, 2010. 15 4. I emailed a copy of the motion to counsel for GoDaddy, “jslafsky@wsgr.com” on 16 17 August 10, 2010. 5. I placed a copy of the motion in a U.S. Mail envelope with first class postage pre- 18 paid addressed to: 19 John Slafsky, Esq. 20 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC 21 650 Page Mill Road 22 Palo Alto, CA 94303 23 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH OPPAPP000124 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç 1 2 3 4 6. Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îì ±º íì I deposited the U.S. Mail envelope identified in Paragraph 5 (above) in a U.S. Mailbox on August 10, 2010. I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct. Dated: August 10, 2010 5 6 By: 7 /s/ Perry R. Clark Perry R. Clark . 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH OPPAPP000125 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îë ±º íì 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ex. C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH OPPAPP000126 Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Page 1 of 2 Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îê ±º íì United States Patent and Trademark Office Home|Site Index|Search|FAQ|Glossary|Guides|Contacts|eBusiness|eBiz alerts|News|Help Trademarks â Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) TESS was last updated on Wed Jul 7 03:54:50 EDT 2010 Logout д»¿-» ´±¹±«¬ ©¸»² §±« ¿®» ¼±²» ¬± ®»´»¿-» -§-¬»³ ®»-±«®½»- ¿´´±½¿¬»¼ º±® §±«ò Start List At: OR Jump to record: Record 2 out of 3 ( Use the "Back" button of the Internet Browser to return to TESS) Word Mark Goods and Services PETRONAS ×Ý ððïò ËÍ ððï ððë ððê ðïð ðîê ðìêò Ù ú Íæ ݸ»³·½¿´- ¿²¼ °»¬®±½¸»³·½¿´- º±® «-» ·² ¬¸» ³¿²«º¿½¬«®» ±º °¸¿®³¿½»«¬·½¿´-ô ½±-³»¬·½-ô ¼»¬»®¹»²¬-ô °¿½µ¿¹·²¹ô ©·®» ¿²¼ ½¿¾´» ·²-¬¿´´¿¬·±²ô ½¿--»¬¬» ¬¿°»-ô °·°»-ô ¬±§-ô º·´³-ô º´±±®·²¹-ô -§²¬¸»¬·½ ®«¾¾»®ô °¿·²¬- ¿²¼ ½±¿¬·²¹-ô ¿¼¸»-·ª»-ô º«»´ ¿¼¼·¬·ª»- ¿²¼ ´«¾®·½¿²¬-ô ¬»¨¬·´»-ô ¿¹®·½«´¬«®»ô »´»½¬®·½¿´ ¿²¼ »´»½¬®±²·½ ½±³°±²»²¬-ô ¿«¬±³±¬·ª» °¿®¬-ô ¿»®±-°¿½» ¿²¼ ¿ª·¿¬·±²ô ¾«·´¼·²¹ ¿²¼ ½±²-¬®«½¬·±² ³¿¬»®·¿´-ô °´¿-¬·½-ô º±±¼-ô ¿²¼ ¼·¿¹²±-¬·½ »¯«·°³»²¬å ½¸»³·½¿´ ¿²¼ °»¬®±½¸»³·½¿´ ·² ¬¸» ²¿¬«®» ±º ³»¬¸¿²±´ô »¬¸§´»²»ô ³»¬¸§´ ¬»®¬·¿®§ ¾«¬§´ »¬¸»® øÓÌÞÛ÷ô ª·²§´ ½¸´±®·¼» ³±²±³»®ô °±´§ª·²§´ ½¸´±®·¼»ô °±´§»¬¸§´»²»ô °±´§°®±°§´»²»ô °®±°§´»²»ô »¬¸§´ ¾»²¦»²»ô ¿²¼ -¬§®»²» ³±²±³»® ¿´´ º±® «-» ·² ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ô º±®»-¬®§ô ¿¹®·½«´¬«®¿´ô ¸±®¬·½«´¬«®¿´ô ¿²¼ -½·»²¬·º·½ ¿°°´·½¿¬·±²-å °¸±¬±¹®¿°¸·½ ½¸»³·½¿´-å ¿®¬·º·½·¿´ ¿²¼ -§²¬¸»¬·½ ®»-·²- º±® «-» ·² ¬¸» ³¿²«º¿½¬«®» ±º º·¾»®-ô °±´§³»®¿²¼ ½±¿¬·²¹-ô ¿²¼ ³±´¼·²¹ ½±³°±«²¼-å °´¿-¬·½ ³±´¼·²¹ ½±³°±«²¼- º±® «-» ·² °´¿-¬·½ »¨¬®«-·±² ±°»®¿¬·±²- °´¿-¬·½ ³±´¼·²¹ ½±³°±«²¼- º±® «-» ¬¸» ³¿²«º¿½¬«®» ±º ³±´¼»¼ °´¿-¬·½ ¿®¬·½´»- ¿²¼ °´¿-¬·½ -¸»»¬- ¿²¼ º·´³-å ½±³°±-¬-å ³¿²«®»-å º»®¬·´·¦»®- º±® ¿¹®·½«´¬«®¿´ ¿²¼ ¼±³»-¬·½ «-»å ¹´«» º±® ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ °«®°±-»-ô ¿¼¸»-·ª»- º±® ¹»²»®¿´ ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ «-»ô ½±²¬¿½¬ ½»³»²¬-å ¹¿-»- º±® ¸»¿¬·²¹ô ´·¹¸¬·²¹ô -¬»¿³ ¹»²»®¿¬·²¹ô ½±±µ·²¹ô ®»º®·¹»®¿¬·±²ô ¼®§·²¹ ¿²¼ ª»²¬·´¿¬·²¹ º±® ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ «-» ·² ´·¯«·¼ ¿²¼ ¹¿-»±«- º±®³-å ±·´ ¼·-°»®-¿²¬-å ½¸»³·½¿´- º±® -»°¿®¿¬·²¹ ±·´-å ¸§¼®¿«´·½ º´«·¼- º±® ¹»²»®¿´ «-»å ½¸»³·½¿´ ¿¼¼·¬·ª»- º±® «-» ·² ¬¸» ³¿²«º¿½¬«®» ±º º«»´-ô ´«¾®·½¿²¬-ô ¹¿-±´·²» ¿²¼ ¼®·´´·²¹ ´«¾®·½¿²¬-å ¼®·´´·²¹ ³«¼- º±® «-» ·² ±·´ ©»´´ ¼®·´´·²¹ô ½±±´¿²¬- º±® ª»¸·½´» »²¹·²»-ô ¸»¿¬ ¬®¿²-º»® º´«·¼- º±® ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ «-»ô ¸§¼®¿«´·½ º´«·¼- º±® ¹»²»®¿´ «-»ô ¿½·¼«´¿¬»¼ ©¿¬»® º±® ®»½¸¿®¹·²¹ ¿½½«³«´¿¬±®- ¿²¼ ¾¿¬¬»®·»-å ½¸»³·½¿´ ¿¼¼·¬·ª»- º±® «-» ©·¬¸ ·²¬»®²¿´ ½±³¾«-¬·±² »²¹·²»-ò ½¸»³·½¿´ ¿¼¼·¬·ª»- º±® º«»´ -¿ª·²¹ ¬®»¿¬³»²¬-ô ½¿¬¿´§-¬- º±® «-» ·² ¬¸» ±·´ °®±½»--·²¹ ·²¼«-¬®§ô ±·´ º±® °®»-»®ª¿¬·±² ±º ³¿-±²®§ ×Ý ððìò ËÍ ððï ððê ðïëò Ù ú Íæ Ì®¿²-³·--·±² º´«·¼-ô ½«¬¬·²¹ ±·´ º±® ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ ³»¬¿´©±®µ·²¹ô Ý®«¼» ±·´ô ²¿¬«®¿´ ¹¿-±´·²»ô º«»´ ±·´ ¿²¼ ¹»²»®¿´ °«®°±-» ¹®»¿-»-ô ¿´´ °«®°±-» ´«¾®·½¿²¬-å ¹¿-±´·²»å º«»´ ¹¿-å º«»´ ±·´-å º«»´ ¿´½±¸±´å ¼·»-»´ º«»´å ¹¿-å ¹¿-±´·²» ¿- ´«¾®·½¿²¬å µ»®±-»²»ô «²´»¿¼»¼ º«»´å ±·´ ¹¿-å °¿®¿ºº·²å °»¬®±´»«³å °»¬®±´»«³ »¬¸»®ô º«»´- ·² ´·¯«·¼ô ¹¿-»±«- ¿²¼ -±´·¼ º±®³ô ¼«-¬ ´§·²¹ ¿²¼ ¿¾-±®¾·²¹ OPPAPP000127 http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4010:9jc6p3.2.2 7/7/2010 Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Page 2 of 2 Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îé ±º íì ½±³°±-·¬·±²- º±® «-» ±² «²°¿ª»¼ ®±¿¼-å ²±²ó½¸»³·½¿´ ¿¼¼·¬·ª»- º±® ±·´- ¿²¼ º«»´-å °»¬®±´»«³ ¶»´´§ º±® ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ °«®°±-»-ô ¬¿´´±©ô ¿«¬±³¿¬·½ ¬®¿²-³·--·±² º´«·¼-å ³»¬¸¿²±´ °»¬®±½¸»³·½¿´- º±® «-» ·² º«»´ô °»¬®±´»«³ ¾¿-»¼ ¼«-¬ -«°°®»--·²¹ ½±³°±-·¬·±²- º±® «-» ·² ³¿²«º¿½¬«®» ×Ý ðïïò ËÍ ðïí ðîï ðîí ðíï ðíìò Ù ú Íæ ß·® ½±²¼·¬·±²»®-ô ©¿¬»® ¼·-¬·´´¿¬·±² «²·¬-ô º´¿®»-ô ¹¿- ¿²¼ °»¬®±´ ¾«®²»®- º±® ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ °«®°±-»-å ¹¿- ®»¹«´¿¬±®-ô ¸»¿¬ »¨½¸¿²¹»®-ô ¸»¿¬ °«³°-ô °¿-¬»«®·¦»®- º±® «-» ·² º±±¼ ¿²¼ ¾»ª»®¿¹» ·²¼«-¬®§å »´»½¬®·½ ®¿¼·¿¬±®- ²±¬ º±® ³±¬±®- ±® »²¹·²»-ô -±´¿® ½±´´»½¬±®- º±® ¸»¿¬·²¹ -±´¿® º«®²¿½»-ô ©¿¬»® º·´¬»®Mark Drawing Code Design Search Code øí÷ ÜÛÍ×ÙÒ ÐÔËÍ ÉÑÎÜÍô ÔÛÌÌÛÎÍô ßÒÜñÑÎ ÒËÓÞÛÎÍ ðïòïëòðè ó ο·²¼®±° ø¿ -·²¹´» ¼®±°÷å Í·²¹´» ¼®±° ø®¿·²ô ¬»¿®ô »¬½ò÷å Ì»¿®¼®±° ø¿ -·²¹´» ¼®±°÷ îêòðíòïé ó ݱ²½»²¬®·½ ±ª¿´-å ݱ²½»²¬®·½ ±ª¿´- ¿²¼ ±ª¿´- ©·¬¸·² ±ª¿´-å Ѫ¿´- ©·¬¸·² ±ª¿´-å Ѫ¿´-ô ½±²½»²¬®·½ îêòðíòîï ó Ѫ¿´- ¬¸¿¬ ¿®» ½±³°´»¬»´§ ±® °¿®¬·¿´´§ -¸¿¼»¼ îêòðíòîè ó Ó·-½»´´¿²»±«- ¼»-·¹²- ©·¬¸ ±ª»®¿´´ ±ª¿´ -¸¿°»ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¿³±»¾¿ó´·µ» -¸¿°»- ¿²¼ ·®®»¹«´¿® ±ª¿´-å Ѫ¿´ -¸¿°» ø³·-½»´´¿²»±«- ±ª»®¿´´ -¸¿°»÷ Serial Number Filing Date Current Filing Basis Original Filing Basis Published for Opposition Registration Number Registration Date Owner éèïððïèë Attorney of Record Description of Mark Type of Mark Register Live/Dead Indicator Þ®·¿² Ûò Þ¿²²»® Ü»½»³¾»® îèô îððï ììÛ ïÞåììÛ ß«¹«-¬ îìô îððì îçêçéðé Ö«´§ ïçô îððë øÎÛÙ×ÍÌÎßÒÌ÷ 묮±´·¿³ Ò¿-·±²¿´ Þ»®¸¿¼ ÝÑÎÐÑÎßÌ×ÑÒ ÓßÔßÇÍ×ß Ð»¬®±²¿- Ì©·² ̱©»®-ô ̱©»® ï Õ«¿´¿ Ô«³°«® Ý·¬§ Ý»²¬®» ëððèè Õ«¿´¿ Ô«³°«® ÓßÔßÇÍ×ß Ì¸» ³¿®µ ½±²-·-¬- ±º ̸» ¼»-·¹² °±®¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ³¿®µ ¬± ¬¸» ®·¹¸¬ ±º ¬¸» ©±®¼ þÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍþ ·- ¬¸» º¿²½·º«´ ®»°®»-»²¬¿¬·±² ±º ¿ ¼®±° ±º ±·´ ·² ¬¸» ½±´±® ¹®»»² ¿²¼ ¹®»»² ·- ½´¿·³»¼ ¿- ¿ °¿®¬ ±º ¬¸» ³¿®µò ÌÎßÜÛÓßÎÕ ÐÎ×ÒÝ×ÐßÔ Ô×ÊÛ |.HOME | SITE INDEX| SEARCH | eBUSINESS | HELP | PRIVACY POLICY OPPAPP000128 http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4010:9jc6p3.2.2 7/7/2010 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îè ±º íì 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Ex. D 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH OPPAPP000129 WhoIs Search Results Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Page 1 of 3 Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îç ±º íì Ë-»®²¿³»ñÝ«-¬±³»® ý п--©±®¼ Ý®»¿¬» ß½½±«²¬ ¤ Ú±®¹±¬ п--©±®¼ ¤ Í·¹² Ñ«¬ Domain Auctions Products Domains Hosting Email Websites eCommerce Business Ü»¿´- ±º ¬¸» Ü¿§ Marketplace SSL & Security Support & Community Design Resellers PETRONAS ͸±© ß´´ Ó§ Ю±¼«½¬- Check to add these alternate PETRONASTOWERS domain names. .INFO üðòèçöñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ .ORG üïìòççöñ§® .ME üèòççñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ .MOBI üêòççöñ§® Check to add these similar PETRONASTOWERS.NET domain names. THEÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍòòò MYÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍòòòò üèòççöñ§® FREEÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎòòò üèòççöñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ BESTÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎòòò üèòççöñ§® SÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍòÒòòò How to grow STEEL BALLS (even if you're a woman) üèòççöñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ üèòççöñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ òòòÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍSITEòÒÛÌ üèòççöñ§® ONLINEÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉòòò üèòççöñ§® þß³¿¦·²¹ ·¼»¿-ÿþ ó Ù¿®®»¬¬ Õò òòòÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍONLINEòÒÛÌ üèòççöñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ Check to add these Premium domain names. 묮±²¿-Ô·º»-¬§´»ò½±³ üíôðððòðð ̱©»®ß¹»²¬ò½±³ üçççòðð ̱©»®Í¿´»-ò½±³ üçèèòðð ̱©»®-Ý´«¾ò½±³ üçððòðð öд«- ×ÝßÒÒ º»» ±º üðòïè °»® ¼±³¿·² ²¿³» §»¿®ò ööòÝß ¼±³¿·² ²¿³»- ©·´´ ¾» ®»¹·-¬»®»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸ Ù± Ü¿¼¼§ ܱ³¿·²- Ý¿²¿¼¿ô ײ½òô ¿ Ý×Îß ½»®¬·º·»¼ ®»¹·-¬®¿®ò ̸» ¼¿¬¿ ½±²¬¿·²»¼ ·² ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ô ײ½òù- ÉØÑ×Í ¼¿¬¿¾¿-»ô ©¸·´» ¾»´·»ª»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» ½±³°¿²§ ¬± ¾» ®»´·¿¾´»ô ·- °®±ª·¼»¼ þ¿- ·-þ ©·¬¸ ²± ¹«¿®¿²¬»» ±® ©¿®®¿²¬·»- ®»¹¿®¼·²¹ ·¬- ¿½½«®¿½§ò ̸··²º±®³¿¬·±² ·- °®±ª·¼»¼ º±® ¬¸» -±´» °«®°±-» ±º ¿--·-¬·²¹ §±« ·² ±¾¬¿·²·²¹ ·²º±®³¿¬·±² ¿¾±«¬ ¼±³¿·² ²¿³» ®»¹·-¬®¿¬·±² ®»½±®¼-ò ß²§ «-» ±º ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ º±® ¿²§ ±¬¸»® °«®°±-» ·- »¨°®»--´§ º±®¾·¼¼»² ©·¬¸±«¬ ¬¸» °®·±® ©®·¬¬»² °»®³·--·±² ±º ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ô ײ½ò Þ§ -«¾³·¬¬·²¹ ¿² ·²¯«·®§ô §±« ¿¹®»» ¬± ¬¸»-» ¬»®³- ±º «-¿¹» ¿²¼ ´·³·¬¿¬·±²- ±º ©¿®®¿²¬§ò ײ °¿®¬·½«´¿®ô §±« ¿¹®»» ²±¬ ¬± «-» ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ ¬± ¿´´±©ô »²¿¾´»ô ±® ±¬¸»®©·-» ³¿µ» °±--·¾´»ô ¼·--»³·²¿¬·±² ±® ½±´´»½¬·±² ±º ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ô ·² °¿®¬ ±® ·² ·¬- »²¬·®»¬§ô º±® ¿²§ °«®°±-»ô -«½¸ ¿- ¬¸» ¬®¿²-³·--·±² ±º «²-±´·½·¬»¼ ¿¼ª»®¬·-·²¹ ¿²¼ -±´·½·¬¿¬·±²- ±º ¿²§ µ·²¼ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ -°¿³ò DZ« º«®¬¸»® ¿¹®»» ²±¬ ¬± «-» ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ ¬± »²¿¾´» ¸·¹¸ ª±´«³»ô ¿«¬±³¿¬»¼ ±® ®±¾±¬·½ »´»½¬®±²·½ °®±½»--»- ¼»-·¹²»¼ ¬± ½±´´»½¬ ±® ½±³°·´» ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ º±® ¿²§ °«®°±-»ô OPPAPP000130 http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.aspx?domain=petronastowers.net&prog_id=godaddy 7/7/2010 WhoIs Search Results Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Page 2 of 3 Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»í𠱺 íì ·²½´«¼·²¹ ³·²·²¹ ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ º±® §±«® ±©² °»®-±²¿´ ±® ½±³³»®½·¿´ °«®°±-»-ò д»¿-» ²±¬»æ ¬¸» ®»¹·-¬®¿²¬ ±º ¬¸» ¼±³¿·² ²¿³» ·- -°»½·º·»¼ ·² ¬¸» þ®»¹·-¬®¿²¬þ º·»´¼ò ײ ³±-¬ ½¿-»-ô ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ô ײ½ò ·- ²±¬ ¬¸» ®»¹·-¬®¿²¬ ±º ¼±³¿·² ²¿³»- ´·-¬»¼ ·² ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿¾¿-»ò λ¹·-¬®¿²¬æ Ø»·µ± ͽ¸±»²»µ»-ÞÐÓ ïçëîîê íéî Ñ´¼ ͬ®»»¼ Ô±²¼±²ô Ô±²¼±² ÛÝïÊ çßË Ë²·¬»¼ Õ·²¹¼±³ λ¹·-¬»®»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸æ ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ô ײ½ò ø¸¬¬°æññ©©©ò¹±¼¿¼¼§ò½±³÷ ܱ³¿·² Ò¿³»æ ÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍòÒÛÌ Ý®»¿¬»¼ ±²æ ðèóÓ¿§óðí Û¨°·®»- ±²æ ðèóÓ¿§óïï Ô¿-¬ Ë°¼¿¬»¼ ±²æ îíóÓ¿®óïð ß¼³·²·-¬®¿¬·ª» ݱ²¬¿½¬æ ͽ¸±»²»µ»--ô Ø»·µ± ½½Á´¬¼à´·ª»ò½±³ ÞÐÓ ïçëîîê íéî Ñ´¼ ͬ®»»¼ Ô±²¼±²ô Ô±²¼±² ÛÝïÊ çßË Ë²·¬»¼ Õ·²¹¼±³ õììòîðéêêíêêðê Ú¿¨ óó õììòîðéêêíêêðê Ì»½¸²·½¿´ ݱ²¬¿½¬æ ͽ¸±»²»µ»--ô Ø»·µ± ½½Á´¬¼à´·ª»ò½±³ ÞÐÓ ïçëîîê íéî Ñ´¼ ͬ®»»¼ Ô±²¼±²ô Ô±²¼±² ÛÝïÊ çßË Ë²·¬»¼ Õ·²¹¼±³ õììòîðéêêíêêðê Ú¿¨ óó õììòîðéêêíêêðê ܱ³¿·² -»®ª»®- ·² ´·-¬»¼ ±®¼»®æ ÒÍíçòÜÑÓß×ÒÝÑÒÌÎÑÔòÝÑÓ ÒÍìðòÜÑÓß×ÒÝÑÒÌÎÑÔòÝÑÓ Î»¹·-¬®§ ͬ¿¬«-æ ½´·»²¬Ü»´»¬»Ð®±¸·¾·¬»¼ λ¹·-¬®§ ͬ¿¬«-æ ½´·»²¬Î»²»©Ð®±¸·¾·¬»¼ λ¹·-¬®§ ͬ¿¬«-æ ½´·»²¬Ì®¿²-º»®Ð®±¸·¾·¬»¼ λ¹·-¬®§ ͬ¿¬«-æ ½´·»²¬Ë°¼¿¬»Ð®±¸·¾·¬»¼ Í»» ˲¼»®´§·²¹ λ¹·-¬®§ Ü¿¬¿ λ°±®¬ ײª¿´·¼ ɸ±·- Sign up for special offers: Account Manager Ó§ ß½½±«²¬ Ó§ λ²»©¿´Ó§ Ë°¹®¿¼»ß½½±«²¬ Í»¬¬·²¹Ý«-¬±³»® ײº±®³¿¬·±² Ñ®¼»® Ø·-¬±®§ Ý®»¿¬» ß½½±«²¬ Û²¬»® §±«® »³¿·´ ¿¼¼®»-Shopping Ѻº»® Ü·-½´¿·³»®Ü±³¿·² Í»¿®½¸ Ю±¼«½¬ Ý¿¬¿´±¹ Ю±¼«½¬ ß¼ª·-±® Ù·º¬ Ý¿®¼Ù± Ü¿¼¼§ Ó±¾·´» ̱¼¿§ù- Ѻº»®- Resources É»¾³¿·´ ÉØÑ×Í -»¿®½¸ ×ÝßÒÒ Ý±²º·®³¿¬·±² ߺº·´·¿¬»Ý±²²»½¬ ©·¬¸ ËÙ¿¼¹»¬-ñÉ·¼¹»¬Ý±³³»®½·¿´ ݱ²¬»-¬ Í·¬» Ó¿° Help and Support Ì»´»°¸±²» Í«°°±®¬ ú Í¿´»Þ·´´·²¹ Í«°°±®¬ Û³¿·´ Ñ«® Í«°°±®¬ Ì»¿³ Ú®»¯«»²¬´§ ß-µ»¼ Ï«»-¬·±²Ü·-½«--·±² Ú±®«³Ë-»® Ù«·¼»Î»°±®¬ Í°¿³ Ì»-¬ Ñ«® Ю±¼«½¬- About Go Daddy Ý¿®»»®Í»½«®·¬§ Ý»²¬»® ݱ³°¿²§ ײº± Ò»©- Ý»²¬»® ̸» ͽ±±° ú Ϋ³±® ݱ Ý«-¬±³»® Ì»-¬·³±²·¿´Ó¿®µ»¬·²¹ Ю±°±-¿´- Ë-» ±º ¬¸·- Í·¬» ·- -«¾¶»½¬ ¬± »¨°®»-- Ì»®³- ±º Ë-»ò Þ§ «-·²¹ ¬¸·- Í·¬»ô §±« -·¹²·º§ ¬¸¿¬ §±« ¿¹®»» ¬± ¾» ¾±«²¼ ¾§ ¬¸»-» Ì»®³- ±º Ë-» Ô»¹¿´ Ю·ª¿½§ б´·½§ OPPAPP000131 http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.aspx?domain=petronastowers.net&prog_id=godaddy 7/7/2010 WhoIs Search Results Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Page 3 of 3 Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»íï ±º íì ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ ·- ¬¸» ©±®´¼ù- Ò±ò ï ×ÝßÒÒó¿½½®»¼·¬»¼ ¼±³¿·² ²¿³» ®»¹·-¬®¿® º±® òÝÑÓô òÒÛÌô òÑÎÙô ò×ÒÚÑô òÞ×Æ ¿²¼ òËÍ ¼±³¿·² ݱ°§®·¹¸¬ w ïççç ó îðïð ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ô ײ½ò ß´´ ®·¹¸¬- ®»-»®ª»¼ò OPPAPP000132 http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.aspx?domain=petronastowers.net&prog_id=godaddy 7/7/2010 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»íî ±º íì 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Ex. E 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH OPPAPP000133 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»íí ±º íì OPPAPP000134 Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»íì ±º íì OPPAPP000135

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?