Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.
Filing
153
DECLARATION of Perry Clark in Opposition to 152 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed byPetroliam Nasional Berhad. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20 (Part 1 of 3), # 22 Exhibit 20 (Part 2 of 3), # 23 Exhibit 20 (Part 3 of 3))(Related document(s) 152 ) (Clark, Perry) (Filed on 12/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Ex. 8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CLARK DECL. ISO OPP. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
1
2
3
4
5
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ï ±º íì
Perry R. Clark, Esq.
Law Offices of Perry R. Clark
3457 Cowper St.
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: (650) 248-5817
Facsimile: (650) 248-5816
perry@perryclarklaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
PETRONASTOWERS.NET, an internet domain
name,
15
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO: 10-CV-03052 PJH
Date: September 15, 2010
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Location: Courtroom 3
Third Floor
16
17
18
19
20
NOTICE OF MOTION AND
MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME
PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND
FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
21
22
23
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
OPPAPP000102
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
1
I.
2
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»î ±º íì
NOTICE OF MOTION
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: Please take notice that Plaintiff
3
Petroliam Nasional Berhad (“Plaintiff” or “Petronas”) will and hereby does makes this motion
4
for an order transferring the domain name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” to Plaintiff Petronas
5
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) and for entry of judgment. Please further take notice of the
6
hearing date for this motion: September 15, 2010 at 9 a.m.
7
II.
8
9
STATEMENT OF RELIEF REQUESTED
Plaintiff Petronas requests that this Court issue an order directing GoDaddy.Com, Inc. to
transfer the domain name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” to Plaintiff Petronas pursuant to 15
10
U.S.C. § 1125(D). Plaintiff Petronas further requests an order entering final judgment in
11
Petronas’s favor in this action. On July 12, 2010, Plaintiff Petronas informed the registrant of
12
the internet domain name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” of its intent to pursue this action at the
13
physical and email addresses provided GoDaddy and as required by 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D). Ex.
14
A. Plaintiff Petronas has not received any communication from the registrant as of the date of
15
this motion. Plaintiff Petronas also has served a copy of the motion and supporting papers as set
16
forth in declaration of service attached as Ex. B on the registrant and counsel for the domain
17
name registrar, GoDaddy.com, Inc. Plaintiff Petronas is unaware of any person or entity that
18
does, or would, oppose the motion.
19
20
III.
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
The “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name should be transferred to Plaintiff
21
Petronas under the Anticyberpiracy section of the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. §
22
1125(D)(2). A court may issue an order transferring a domain name pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §
23
1125(D)(2) where: (1) the domain name “violates any right of the owner of a mark registered in
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D)
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
ï
OPPAPP000103
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»í ±º íì
1
the Patent and Trademark Office,” 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D)(2)(A)(i), (2) the owner of the mark “is
2
not able obtain in personam jurisdiction over a person who would have been a defendant in a
3
civil action [for cybersquatting] under [15 U.S.C. § 1125(D)] paragraph (1),” 15 U.S.C. §
4
1125(D)(2)(A)(ii)(I), and (3) the domain name registrar “deposit[s] with the court documents
5
sufficient to establish the court’s control and authority regarding the disposition of the
6
registration and use of the domain name,” 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D)(2)(D). Because all three of the
7
foregoing requirements are met with respect to the domain name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET,”
8
an order transferring the domain name to Petronas should issue in this case.
9
10
A.
“PETRONASTOWERS.NET” Infringes the Trademark Rights of Petronas
There can be no dispute that the first requirement for the transfer of the
11
“PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain under the Anticyberpiracy section of the Lanham Act—
12
that the domain name infringes the trademark rights of Petronas—is met in this case.
13
Specifically, the Anticyberpiracy section applies to any domain name “that violates any right of
14
the owner of a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office, or protected under subsection
15
(a) [false designation of origin] or (c) [dilution] [of 15 U.S.C. § 1125].” 15 U.S.C. §
16
1125(d)(2)(A)(i).
17
Here, the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name violates the rights of Petronas
18
with respect to its federally registered “PETRONAS” mark because it infringes that mark under
19
15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) and (c). As an initial matter, Petronas is the owner of the duly registered
20
federal trademark for the mark “PETRONAS.” Ex. C. In addition, the
21
“PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name infringes the “PETRONAS” mark under 15 U.S.C.
22
§ 1114 because the domain name is “a use in commerce” of the “PETRONAS” mark that is
23
“likely to cause confusion” among consumers as to whether the pornographic website using the
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D)
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
î
OPPAPP000104
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ì ±º íì
1
“PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name is associated with Petronas—which it is not.
2
Automotive Gold, Inc. v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 457 F.3d 1062, 1075-76 (9th Cir. 2006).
3
Moreover, the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name violates the rights of Petronas under
4
15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) by creating a “false designation of origin” as to the pornographic website
5
found at the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name because that site did not “originate”
6
with Petronas and, in fact, Petronas strongly objects to the site and its use of “PETRONAS.”
7
New West Corp. v. N.Y.M. Co. of California, 595 F.2d 1194, 1201 (9th Cir. 1979) (“Whether we
8
call the violation infringement, unfair competition, or false designation of origin, the test is
9
identical—is there a likelihood of confusion?”).
10
Accordingly, the first requirement for the transfer of the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET”
11
domain name to Petronas under the Anticyberpiracy section of the Lanham is met because that
12
domain name infringes the trademark rights of Petronas.
13
B.
In Personam Jurisdiction Is Unavailable As To The Registrant of
“PETRONASTOWERS.NET”
14
15
The second requirement for the transfer of “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” to Petronas is
16
met because in a civil action under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d) the court would not have had in
17
personam jurisdiction over the registrant of the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name.
18
According to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I), an in rem action for the transfer of a domain name
19
is proper where “the owner [of the mark] . . . is not able to obtain in personam jurisdiction over a
20
person who would have been a defendant in a civil action [for cybersquatting] under [15 U.S.C.
21
§ 1125(d)] paragraph (2).” 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I).
22
23
Here, according to records of the registrar of the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain
name (GoDaddy.com), the domain name was registered by “Heiko Schonenekess” whose
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D)
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
í
OPPAPP000105
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ë ±º íì
1
address is “BPM 195226, 372 Old Street, London, Ec1V 9AU, United Kingdom.” Ex. D. The
2
internet registrant also provided an email address: “cc_ltd@live.com.” Although Plaintiff
3
Petronas tried repeatedly to locate and contact the registrant, including by Federal Express and
4
email, it was unable to do so. Petronas was also unable to identify any grounds for the exercise
5
of personal jurisdiction over the registrant. The registrant of the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET”
6
domain name would be liable as a defendant in action for cybersquatting under 15 U.S.C. §
7
1125(d). Because the registrant of the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain could not be
8
subjected to in personam jurisdiction, the second requirement of the Anticyberpiracy section has
9
been met with respect to the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name.
10
C.
The Domain Registrar (GoDaddy) Certifies This Court’s Authority Over the
Domain Name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET”
11
12
GoDaddy is the registrar of the domain name “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” and, as
13
required by the Anitcyberpiracy section, has provided certification that this Court has the
14
“control and authority” to transfer the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name to Petronas.
15
Specifically, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2)(D)(i) provides that, upon the filing of an Anticyberpiracy
16
action, “the domain name registrar . . . shall expeditiously deposit with the court documents
17
sufficient to establish the court’s control and authority regarding the disposition of the
18
registration and use of the domain name to the court.” GoDaddy provided this information to
19
Petronas and it is being filed along with this motion. Ex. E. As a result, all of the requirements
20
for an order directing GoDaddy to transfer the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name to
21
Petronas under the Anticyberpiracy section have been met.
22
23
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D)
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
ì
OPPAPP000106
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ê ±º íì
1
D.
2
In this action, Plaintiff Petronas seeks an order transferring the
Entry of Judgment
3
“PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name. Upon the issuance of such an order, the Court will
4
have granted complete relief to Petronas and entry of judgment will be proper under Fed. R. Civ.
5
P. 54. Accordingly, Plaintiff Petronas requests that in addition to an order transferring the
6
“PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name, the Court also issue final judgment in favor of
7
Petronas.
8
9
IV.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff Petronas respectfully requests an order directing
10
GoDaddy.com to transfer the “PETRONASTOWERS.NET” domain name to Petronas and the
11
entry of judgment in favor of Petronas. A proposed order and proposed final judgment are being
12
filed with this motion.
13
Dated: August 10, 2010
LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK
14
15
By:
16
17
/s/ Perry R. Clark
Perry R. Clark
.
Attorney for Plaintiff
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D)
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
ë
OPPAPP000107
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»é ±º íì
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Ex. A
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
OPPAPP000108
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»è ±º íì
LAW OFFICES OF
PERRY R. CLARK
3457 Cowper St.
PALO ALTO, CA 94306
TELEPHONE: 650 248 5817
FACSIMILE: 650 618 8533
July 12, 2010
By Electronic Mail and Federal Express
Heiko Schoenekess
BPM 195226
372 Old Street
London EC1V 9AU
United Kingdom
Re:
“PETRONASTOWERS.NET” DOMAIN NAME
To Whom It May Concern:
Please take notice that your registration of the domain name
“PETRONASTOWERS.NET” is a violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) and that we intend
to proceed as counsel for Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) pursuant to that section
as set forth in the enclosed complaint. We also have provided this notice to you by
electronic mail at the email address (“cc_ltd@live.com”) maintained by GoDaddy.com,
Inc., the registrar of “PETRONASTOWERS.NET.”
Best Regards,
Perry Clark
OPPAPP000109
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ç ±º íì
OPPAPP000110
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ï𠱺 íì
OPPAPP000111
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïï ±º íì
OPPAPP000112
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïî ±º íì
OPPAPP000113
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïí ±º íì
OPPAPP000114
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïì ±º íì
OPPAPP000115
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïë ±º íì
OPPAPP000116
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïê ±º íì
Page 1
39 of 99 DOCUMENTS
UNITED STATES CODE SERVICE
Copyright © 2010 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
a member of the LexisNexis Group (TM)
All rights reserved.
*** CURRENT THROUGH PL 111-198, WITH A GAP OF PL 111-195, APPROVED 7/2/2010 ***
TITLE 15. COMMERCE AND TRADE
CHAPTER 22. TRADEMARKS
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Go to the United States Code Service Archive Directory
15 USCS § 1125
Review expert commentary from The National Institute for Trial Advocacy preceding 15 USCS § 1051.
THE CASE NOTES SEGMENT OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN SPLIT INTO 2 DOCUMENTS.
THIS IS PART 1.
USE THE BROWSE FEATURE TO REVIEW THE OTHER PART(S).
§ 1125. False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden
(a) Civil action.
(1) Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce
any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or
misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which-(A) is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of
such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, orapproval of his or her goods, services, or
commercial activities by another person, or
(B) in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin
of his or her or another person's goods, services, or commercial activities,
shall be liable in a civil action by any person who believes that he or she is or is likely to be damaged by such act.
(2) As used in this subsection, the term "any person" includes any State, instrumentality of a State or employee of a
State or instrumentality of a State acting in his or her official capacity. Any State, and any such instrumentality, officer,
or employee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Act in the same manner and to the same extent as any
nongovernmental entity.
(3) In a civil action for trade dress infringement under this Act for trade dress not registered on the principal register,
the person who asserts trade dress protection has the burden of proving that the matter sought to be protected is not
functional.
(b) Importation. Any goods marked or labeled in contravention of the provisions of this section shall not be imported
OPPAPP000117
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïé ±º íì
Page 2
15 USCS § 1125
into the United States or admitted to entry at any customhouse of the United States. The owner, importer, or consignee
of goods refused entry at any customhouse under this section may have any recourse by protest or appeal that is given
under the customs revenue laws or may have the remedy given by this Act in cases involving goods refused entry or
seized.
(c) Dilution by blurring; dilution by tarnishment.
(1) Injunctive relief. Subject to the principles of equity, the owner of a famous mark that is distinctive, inherently or
through acquired distinctiveness, shall be entitled to an injunction against another person who, at any time after the
owner's mark has become famous, commences use of a mark or trade name in commerce that is likely to cause dilution
by blurring or dilution by tarnishment of the famous mark, regardless of the presence or absence of actual or likely
confusion, of competition, or of actual economic injury.
(2) Definitions.
(A) For purposes of paragraph (1), a mark is famous if it is widely recognized by the general consuming public of
the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark's owner. In determining whether a mark
possesses the requisite degree of recognition, the court may consider all relevant factors, including the following:
(i) The duration, extent, and geographic reach of advertising and publicity of the mark, whether advertised or
publicized by the owner or third parties.
(ii) The amount, volume, and geographic extent of sales of goods or services offered under the mark.
(iii) The extent of actual recognition of the mark.
(iv) Whether the mark was registered under the Act of March 3, 1881, or the Act of February 20, 1905, or on the
principal register.
(B) For purposes of paragraph (1), "dilution by blurring" is association arising from the similarity between a mark or
trade name and a famous mark that impairs the distinctiveness of the famous mark. In determining whether a mark or
trade name is likely to cause dilution by blurring, the court may consider all relevant factors, including the following:
(i) The degree of similarity between the mark or trade name and the famous mark.
(ii) The degree of inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the famous mark.
(iii) The extent to which the owner of the famous mark is engaging in substantially exclusive use of the mark.
(iv) The degree of recognition of the famous mark.
(v) Whether the user of the mark or trade name intended to create an association with the famous mark.
(vi) Any actual association between the mark or trade name and the famous mark.
(C) For purposes of paragraph (1), "dilution by tarnishment" is association arising from the similarity between a
mark or trade name and a famous mark that harms the reputation of the famous mark.
(3) Exclusions. The following shall not be actionable as dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment under this
subsection:
(A) Any fair use, including a nominative or descriptive fair use, or facilitation of such fair use, of a famous mark by
another person other than as a designation of source for the person's own goods or services, including use in connection
with-(i) advertising or promotion that permits consumers to compare goods or services; or
(ii) identifying and parodying, criticizing, or commenting upon the famous mark owner or the goods or services of
the famous mark owner.
(B) All forms of news reporting and news commentary.
(C) Any noncommercial use of a mark.
(4) Burden of proof. In a civil action for trade dress dilution under this Act for trade dress not registered on the
principal register, the person who asserts trade dress protection has the burden of proving that-(A) the claimed trade dress, taken as a whole, is not functional and is famous; and
(B) if the claimed trade dress includes any mark or marks registered on the principal register, the unregistered
matter, taken as a whole, is famous separate and apart from any fame of such registered marks.
(5) Additional remedies. In an action brought under this subsection, the owner of the famous mark shall be entitled to
injunctive relief as set forth in section 34. The owner of the famous mark shall also be entitled to the remedies set forth
in sections 35(a) and 36 [15 USCS § 1117(a) and 1118], subject to the discretion of the court and the principles of
OPPAPP000118
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïè ±º íì
Page 3
15 USCS § 1125
equity if-(A) the mark or trade name that is likely to cause dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment was first used in
commerce by the person against whom the injunction is sought after the date of enactment of the Trademark Dilution
Revision Act of 2006 [enacted Oct. 6, 2006]; and
(B) in a claim arising under this subsection-(i) by reason of dilution by blurring, the person against whom the injunction is sought willfully intended to trade
on the recognition of the famous mark; or
(ii) by reason of dilution by tarnishment, the person against whom the injunction is sought willfully intended to
harm the reputation of the famous mark.
(6) Ownership of valid registration a complete bar to action. The ownership by a person of a valid registration under
the Act of March 3, 1881, or the Act of February 20, 1905, or on the principal register under this Act shall be a
complete bar to an action against that person, with respect to that mark, that-(A)
(i) is brought by another person under the common law or a statute of a State; and
(ii) seeks to prevent dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment; or
(B) asserts any claim of actual or likely damage or harm to the distinctiveness or reputation of a mark, label, or form
of advertisement.
(7) Savings clause. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to impair, modify, or supersede the applicability of
the patent laws of the United States.
(d) Cyberpiracy prevention.
(1)
(A) A person shall be liable in a civil action by the owner of a mark, including a personal name which is protected
as a mark under this section, if, without regard to the goods or services of the parties, that person-(i) has a bad faith intent to profit from that mark, including a personal name which is protected as a mark under
this section; and
(ii) registers, traffics in, or uses a domain name that-(I) in the case of a mark that is distinctive at the time of registration of the domain name, is identical or
confusingly similar to that mark;
(II) in the case of a famous mark that is famous at the time of registration of the domain name, is identical or
confusingly similar to or dilutive of that mark; or
(III) is a trademark, word, or name protected by reason of section 706 of title 18, United States Code, or section
220506 of title 36, United States Code.
(B) (i) In determining whether a person has a bad faith intent described under subparagraph (A), a court may
consider factors such as, but not limited to-(I) the trademark or other intellectual property rights of the person, if any, in the domain name;
(II) the extent to which the domain name consists of the legal name of the person or a name that is otherwise
commonly used to identify that person;
(III) the person's prior use, if any, of the domain name in connection with the bona fide offering of any goods or
services;
(IV) the person's bona fide noncommercial or fair use of the mark in a site accessible under the domain name;
(V) the person's intent to divert consumers from the mark owner's online location to a site accessible under the
domain name that could harm the goodwill represented by the mark, either for commercial gain or with the intent to
tarnish or disparage the mark, by creating a likelihood of confusion as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or
endorsement of the site;
(VI) the person's offer to transfer, sell, or otherwise assign the domain name to the mark owner or any third party
for financial gain without having used, or having an intent to use, the domain name in the bona fide offering of any
goods or services, or the person's prior conduct indicating a pattern of such conduct;
(VII) the person's provision of material and misleading false contact information when applying for the
registration of the domain name, the person's intentional failure to maintain accurate contact information, or the person's
OPPAPP000119
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»ïç ±º íì
Page 4
15 USCS § 1125
prior conduct indicating a pattern of such conduct;
(VIII) the person's registration or acquisition of multiple domain names which the person knows are identical or
confusingly similar to marks of others that are distinctive at the time of registration of such domain names, or dilutive of
famous marks of others that are famous at the time of registration of such domain names, without regard to the goods or
services of the parties; and
(IX) the extent to which the mark incorporated in the person's domain name registration is or is not distinctive
and famous within the meaning of subsection (c).
(ii) Bad faith intent described under subparagraph (A) shall not be found in any case in which the court determines
that the person believed and had reasonable grounds to believe that the use of the domain name was a fair use or
otherwise lawful.
(C) In any civil action involving the registration, trafficking, or use of a domain name under this paragraph, a court
may order the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the
mark.
(D) A person shall be liable for using a domain name under subparagraph (A) only if that person is the domain name
registrant or that registrant's authorized licensee.
(E) As used in this paragraph, the term "traffics in" refers to transactions that include, but are not limited to, sales,
purchases, loans, pledges, licenses, exchanges of currency, and any other transfer for consideration or receipt in
exchange for consideration.
(2)
(A) The owner of a mark may file an in rem civil action against a domain name in the judicial district in which the
domain name registrar, domain name registry, or other domain name authority that registered or assigned the domain
name is located if-(i) the domain name violates any right of the owner of a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office, or
protected under subsection (a) or (c); and
(ii) the court finds that the owner-(I) is not able to obtain in personam jurisdiction over a person who would have been a defendant in a civil action
under paragraph (1); or
(II) through due diligence was not able to find a person who would have been a defendant in a civil action under
paragraph (1) by-(aa) sending a notice of the alleged violation and intent to proceed under this paragraph to the registrant of the
domain name at the postal and e-mail address provided by the registrant to the registrar; and
(bb) publishing notice of the action as the court may direct promptly after filing the action.
(B) The actions under subparagraph (A)(ii) shall constitute service of process.
(C) In an in rem action under this paragraph, a domain name shall be deemed to have its situs in the judicial district
in which-(i) the domain name registrar, registry, or other domain name authority that registered or assigned the domain
name is located; or
(ii) documents sufficient to establish control and authority regarding the disposition of the registration and use of
the domain name are deposited with the court.
(D) (i) The remedies in an in rem action under this paragraph shall be limited to a court order for the forfeiture or
cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark. Upon receipt of written
notification of a filed, stamped copy of a complaint filed by the owner of a mark in a United States district court under
this paragraph, the domain name registrar, domain name registry, or other domain name authority shall-(I) expeditiously deposit with the court documents sufficient to establish the court's control and authority
regarding the disposition of the registration and use of the domain name to the court; and
(II) not transfer, suspend, or otherwise modify the domain name during the pendency of the action, except upon
order of the court.
(ii) The domain name registrar or registry or other domain name authority shall not be liable for injunctive or
monetary relief under this paragraph except in the case of bad faith or reckless disregard, which includes a willful
failure to comply with any such court order.
OPPAPP000120
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»î𠱺 íì
Page 5
15 USCS § 1125
(3) The civil action established under paragraph (1) and the in rem action established under paragraph (2), and any
remedy available under either such action, shall be in addition to any other civil action or remedy otherwise applicable.
(4) The in rem jurisdiction established under paragraph (2) shall be in addition to any other jurisdiction that otherwise
exists, whether in rem or in personam.
HISTORY:
(July 5, 1946, ch 540, Title VIII, § 43, 60 Stat. 441; Nov. 16, 1988, P.L. 100-667, Title I, § 132, 102 Stat. 3946; Oct.
27, 1992, P.L. 102-542, § 3(c), 106 Stat. 3568; Jan. 16, 1996, P.L. 104-98, § 3(a), 109 Stat. 985; Aug. 5, 1999, P.L.
106-43, §§ 3(a)(2), 5, 113 Stat. 219, 220; Nov. 29, 1999, P.L. 106-113, Div B, § 1000(a)(9), 113 Stat. 1536.)
(As amended Oct. 6, 2006, P.L. 109-312, § 2, 120 Stat. 1730.)
HISTORY; ANCILLARY LAWS AND DIRECTIVES
References in text:
Acts March 3, 1881 and February 20, 1905, referred to in this section, are Acts March 3, 1881, ch 130, 22 Stat. 388,
and Feb. 20, 1905, ch 592, 33 Stat. 724, which were repealed insofar as inconsistent with 15 USCS §§ 1051 et seq. by
Act July 5, 1946, ch 540, § 46(a), 60 Stat. 444. Act Feb. 20, 1905, formerly appeared as 15 USCS §§ 81 et seq..
"This Act", referred to in this section, is Act July 5, 1946, ch 540, 60 Stat. 427, which is popularly known as the
Lanham Act or the Trademark Act of 1946, and which appears generally as 15 USCS §§ 1051 et seq. For full
classification of such Act, consult USCS Tables volumes.
Explanatory notes:
Similar provisions were contained in Act March 19, 1920, ch 104, § 3, 41 Stat. 534.
The amendment made by § 1000(a)(9) of Act Nov. 29, 1999, P.L. 106-113, is based on § 3002(a) of Title III of S.
1948 (113 Stat. 1501A-545), as introduced on Nov. 17, 1999, which was enacted into law by such § 1000(a)(9).
Effective date of section:
This section takes effect one year from its enactment, as provided by Act July 5, 1946, ch 540, § 46, 60 Stat. 444,
which appears as 15 USCS § 1051 note.
Amendments:
1988. Act Nov. 16, 1988 (effective one year after enactment as provided by § 136 of such Act, which appears as 15
USCS § 1051 note) substituted subsec. (a) for one which read: "(a) Any person who shall affix, apply, or annex, or use
in connection with any goods or services, or any container or containers for goods, a false designation of origin, or any
false description or representation, including words or other symbols tending falsely to describe or represent the same,
and shall cause such goods or services to enter into commerce, and any person who shall with knowledge of the falsity
of such designation of origin or description or representation cause or procure the same to be transported or used in
commerce or deliver the same to any carrier to be transported or used, shall be liable to a civil action by any person
doing business in the locality falsely indicated as that of origin or in the region in which said locality is situated, or by
any person who believes that he is or is likely to be damaged by the use of any such false description or representation.".
OPPAPP000121
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îï ±º íì
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Ex. B
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D)
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
OPPAPP000122
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
1
2
3
4
5
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îî ±º íì
Perry R. Clark, Esq.
Law Offices of Perry R. Clark
3457 Cowper St.
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: (650) 248-5817
Facsimile: (650) 248-5816
perry@perryclarklaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
PETRONASTOWERS.NET, an internet domain
name,
15
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
OPPAPP000123
CASE NO: 10-CV-03052 PJH
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
1
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îí ±º íì
I, Perry Clark, state that I served Plaintiff’s NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR
2
ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1125(D) AND
3
FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT all exhibits thereto (“Motion”) as follows:
4
1.
I placed a copy of the motion in a Federal Express envelope with postage pre-paid
5
for FedEx Express addressed to:
6
Heiko Schonenekess
7
BPM 195226
8
372 Old Street
9
London Ec1V 9AU
10
United Kingdom
11
Tel.: +44.2076636606
12
2.
13
I deposited the Federal Express envelope identified in Paragraph 1 (above) in a
Federal Express drop box on August 10, 2010.
14
3.
I emailed a pdf copy of the motion to “cc_ltd@live.com” on August 10, 2010.
15
4.
I emailed a copy of the motion to counsel for GoDaddy, “jslafsky@wsgr.com” on
16
17
August 10, 2010.
5.
I placed a copy of the motion in a U.S. Mail envelope with first class postage pre-
18
paid addressed to:
19
John Slafsky, Esq.
20
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC
21
650 Page Mill Road
22
Palo Alto, CA 94303
23
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D)
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
OPPAPP000124
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
1
2
3
4
6.
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îì ±º íì
I deposited the U.S. Mail envelope identified in Paragraph 5 (above) in a U.S.
Mailbox on August 10, 2010.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct.
Dated: August 10, 2010
5
6
By:
7
/s/ Perry R. Clark
Perry R. Clark
.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D)
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
OPPAPP000125
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îë ±º íì
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Ex. C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D)
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
OPPAPP000126
Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Page 1 of 2
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îê ±º íì
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Home|Site Index|Search|FAQ|Glossary|Guides|Contacts|eBusiness|eBiz alerts|News|Help
Trademarks â Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
TESS was last updated on Wed Jul 7 03:54:50 EDT 2010
Logout
д»¿-» ´±¹±«¬ ©¸»² §±« ¿®» ¼±²» ¬± ®»´»¿-» -§-¬»³ ®»-±«®½»- ¿´´±½¿¬»¼ º±® §±«ò
Start List At:
OR Jump to record:
Record 2 out of 3
( Use the "Back" button of the Internet
Browser to return to TESS)
Word Mark
Goods and
Services
PETRONAS
×Ý ððïò ËÍ ððï ððë ððê ðïð ðîê ðìêò Ù ú Íæ ݸ»³·½¿´- ¿²¼ °»¬®±½¸»³·½¿´- º±® «-» ·² ¬¸»
³¿²«º¿½¬«®» ±º °¸¿®³¿½»«¬·½¿´-ô ½±-³»¬·½-ô ¼»¬»®¹»²¬-ô °¿½µ¿¹·²¹ô ©·®» ¿²¼ ½¿¾´» ·²-¬¿´´¿¬·±²ô
½¿--»¬¬» ¬¿°»-ô °·°»-ô ¬±§-ô º·´³-ô º´±±®·²¹-ô -§²¬¸»¬·½ ®«¾¾»®ô °¿·²¬- ¿²¼ ½±¿¬·²¹-ô ¿¼¸»-·ª»-ô º«»´
¿¼¼·¬·ª»- ¿²¼ ´«¾®·½¿²¬-ô ¬»¨¬·´»-ô ¿¹®·½«´¬«®»ô »´»½¬®·½¿´ ¿²¼ »´»½¬®±²·½ ½±³°±²»²¬-ô ¿«¬±³±¬·ª» °¿®¬-ô
¿»®±-°¿½» ¿²¼ ¿ª·¿¬·±²ô ¾«·´¼·²¹ ¿²¼ ½±²-¬®«½¬·±² ³¿¬»®·¿´-ô °´¿-¬·½-ô º±±¼-ô ¿²¼ ¼·¿¹²±-¬·½ »¯«·°³»²¬å
½¸»³·½¿´ ¿²¼ °»¬®±½¸»³·½¿´ ·² ¬¸» ²¿¬«®» ±º ³»¬¸¿²±´ô »¬¸§´»²»ô ³»¬¸§´ ¬»®¬·¿®§ ¾«¬§´ »¬¸»® øÓÌÞÛ÷ô
ª·²§´ ½¸´±®·¼» ³±²±³»®ô °±´§ª·²§´ ½¸´±®·¼»ô °±´§»¬¸§´»²»ô °±´§°®±°§´»²»ô °®±°§´»²»ô »¬¸§´ ¾»²¦»²»ô ¿²¼
-¬§®»²» ³±²±³»® ¿´´ º±® «-» ·² ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ô º±®»-¬®§ô ¿¹®·½«´¬«®¿´ô ¸±®¬·½«´¬«®¿´ô ¿²¼ -½·»²¬·º·½ ¿°°´·½¿¬·±²-å
°¸±¬±¹®¿°¸·½ ½¸»³·½¿´-å ¿®¬·º·½·¿´ ¿²¼ -§²¬¸»¬·½ ®»-·²- º±® «-» ·² ¬¸» ³¿²«º¿½¬«®» ±º º·¾»®-ô °±´§³»®¿²¼ ½±¿¬·²¹-ô ¿²¼ ³±´¼·²¹ ½±³°±«²¼-å °´¿-¬·½ ³±´¼·²¹ ½±³°±«²¼- º±® «-» ·² °´¿-¬·½ »¨¬®«-·±²
±°»®¿¬·±²- °´¿-¬·½ ³±´¼·²¹ ½±³°±«²¼- º±® «-» ¬¸» ³¿²«º¿½¬«®» ±º ³±´¼»¼ °´¿-¬·½ ¿®¬·½´»- ¿²¼ °´¿-¬·½
-¸»»¬- ¿²¼ º·´³-å ½±³°±-¬-å ³¿²«®»-å º»®¬·´·¦»®- º±® ¿¹®·½«´¬«®¿´ ¿²¼ ¼±³»-¬·½ «-»å ¹´«» º±® ·²¼«-¬®·¿´
°«®°±-»-ô ¿¼¸»-·ª»- º±® ¹»²»®¿´ ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ «-»ô ½±²¬¿½¬ ½»³»²¬-å ¹¿-»- º±® ¸»¿¬·²¹ô ´·¹¸¬·²¹ô -¬»¿³
¹»²»®¿¬·²¹ô ½±±µ·²¹ô ®»º®·¹»®¿¬·±²ô ¼®§·²¹ ¿²¼ ª»²¬·´¿¬·²¹ º±® ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ «-» ·² ´·¯«·¼ ¿²¼ ¹¿-»±«- º±®³-å
±·´ ¼·-°»®-¿²¬-å ½¸»³·½¿´- º±® -»°¿®¿¬·²¹ ±·´-å ¸§¼®¿«´·½ º´«·¼- º±® ¹»²»®¿´ «-»å ½¸»³·½¿´ ¿¼¼·¬·ª»- º±®
«-» ·² ¬¸» ³¿²«º¿½¬«®» ±º º«»´-ô ´«¾®·½¿²¬-ô ¹¿-±´·²» ¿²¼ ¼®·´´·²¹ ´«¾®·½¿²¬-å ¼®·´´·²¹ ³«¼- º±® «-» ·² ±·´
©»´´ ¼®·´´·²¹ô ½±±´¿²¬- º±® ª»¸·½´» »²¹·²»-ô ¸»¿¬ ¬®¿²-º»® º´«·¼- º±® ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ «-»ô ¸§¼®¿«´·½ º´«·¼- º±®
¹»²»®¿´ «-»ô ¿½·¼«´¿¬»¼ ©¿¬»® º±® ®»½¸¿®¹·²¹ ¿½½«³«´¿¬±®- ¿²¼ ¾¿¬¬»®·»-å ½¸»³·½¿´ ¿¼¼·¬·ª»- º±® «-»
©·¬¸ ·²¬»®²¿´ ½±³¾«-¬·±² »²¹·²»-ò ½¸»³·½¿´ ¿¼¼·¬·ª»- º±® º«»´ -¿ª·²¹ ¬®»¿¬³»²¬-ô ½¿¬¿´§-¬- º±® «-» ·² ¬¸»
±·´ °®±½»--·²¹ ·²¼«-¬®§ô ±·´ º±® °®»-»®ª¿¬·±² ±º ³¿-±²®§
×Ý ððìò ËÍ ððï ððê ðïëò Ù ú Íæ Ì®¿²-³·--·±² º´«·¼-ô ½«¬¬·²¹ ±·´ º±® ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ ³»¬¿´©±®µ·²¹ô Ý®«¼» ±·´ô
²¿¬«®¿´ ¹¿-±´·²»ô º«»´ ±·´ ¿²¼ ¹»²»®¿´ °«®°±-» ¹®»¿-»-ô ¿´´ °«®°±-» ´«¾®·½¿²¬-å ¹¿-±´·²»å º«»´ ¹¿-å º«»´
±·´-å º«»´ ¿´½±¸±´å ¼·»-»´ º«»´å ¹¿-å ¹¿-±´·²» ¿- ´«¾®·½¿²¬å µ»®±-»²»ô «²´»¿¼»¼ º«»´å ±·´ ¹¿-å °¿®¿ºº·²å
°»¬®±´»«³å °»¬®±´»«³ »¬¸»®ô º«»´- ·² ´·¯«·¼ô ¹¿-»±«- ¿²¼ -±´·¼ º±®³ô ¼«-¬ ´§·²¹ ¿²¼ ¿¾-±®¾·²¹
OPPAPP000127
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4010:9jc6p3.2.2
7/7/2010
Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Page 2 of 2
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îé ±º íì
½±³°±-·¬·±²- º±® «-» ±² «²°¿ª»¼ ®±¿¼-å ²±²ó½¸»³·½¿´ ¿¼¼·¬·ª»- º±® ±·´- ¿²¼ º«»´-å °»¬®±´»«³ ¶»´´§ º±®
·²¼«-¬®·¿´ °«®°±-»-ô ¬¿´´±©ô ¿«¬±³¿¬·½ ¬®¿²-³·--·±² º´«·¼-å ³»¬¸¿²±´ °»¬®±½¸»³·½¿´- º±® «-» ·² º«»´ô
°»¬®±´»«³ ¾¿-»¼ ¼«-¬ -«°°®»--·²¹ ½±³°±-·¬·±²- º±® «-» ·² ³¿²«º¿½¬«®»
×Ý ðïïò ËÍ ðïí ðîï ðîí ðíï ðíìò Ù ú Íæ ß·® ½±²¼·¬·±²»®-ô ©¿¬»® ¼·-¬·´´¿¬·±² «²·¬-ô º´¿®»-ô ¹¿- ¿²¼ °»¬®±´
¾«®²»®- º±® ·²¼«-¬®·¿´ °«®°±-»-å ¹¿- ®»¹«´¿¬±®-ô ¸»¿¬ »¨½¸¿²¹»®-ô ¸»¿¬ °«³°-ô °¿-¬»«®·¦»®- º±® «-» ·²
º±±¼ ¿²¼ ¾»ª»®¿¹» ·²¼«-¬®§å »´»½¬®·½ ®¿¼·¿¬±®- ²±¬ º±® ³±¬±®- ±® »²¹·²»-ô -±´¿® ½±´´»½¬±®- º±® ¸»¿¬·²¹
-±´¿® º«®²¿½»-ô ©¿¬»® º·´¬»®Mark
Drawing
Code
Design
Search
Code
øí÷ ÜÛÍ×ÙÒ ÐÔËÍ ÉÑÎÜÍô ÔÛÌÌÛÎÍô ßÒÜñÑÎ ÒËÓÞÛÎÍ
ðïòïëòðè ó ο·²¼®±° ø¿ -·²¹´» ¼®±°÷å Í·²¹´» ¼®±° ø®¿·²ô ¬»¿®ô »¬½ò÷å Ì»¿®¼®±° ø¿ -·²¹´» ¼®±°÷
îêòðíòïé ó ݱ²½»²¬®·½ ±ª¿´-å ݱ²½»²¬®·½ ±ª¿´- ¿²¼ ±ª¿´- ©·¬¸·² ±ª¿´-å Ѫ¿´- ©·¬¸·² ±ª¿´-å Ѫ¿´-ô
½±²½»²¬®·½
îêòðíòîï ó Ѫ¿´- ¬¸¿¬ ¿®» ½±³°´»¬»´§ ±® °¿®¬·¿´´§ -¸¿¼»¼
îêòðíòîè ó Ó·-½»´´¿²»±«- ¼»-·¹²- ©·¬¸ ±ª»®¿´´ ±ª¿´ -¸¿°»ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¿³±»¾¿ó´·µ» -¸¿°»- ¿²¼ ·®®»¹«´¿®
±ª¿´-å Ѫ¿´ -¸¿°» ø³·-½»´´¿²»±«- ±ª»®¿´´ -¸¿°»÷
Serial
Number
Filing Date
Current
Filing Basis
Original
Filing Basis
Published
for
Opposition
Registration
Number
Registration
Date
Owner
éèïððïèë
Attorney of
Record
Description
of Mark
Type of
Mark
Register
Live/Dead
Indicator
Þ®·¿² Ûò Þ¿²²»®
Ü»½»³¾»® îèô îððï
ììÛ
ïÞåììÛ
ß«¹«-¬ îìô îððì
îçêçéðé
Ö«´§ ïçô îððë
øÎÛÙ×ÍÌÎßÒÌ÷ 묮±´·¿³ Ò¿-·±²¿´ Þ»®¸¿¼ ÝÑÎÐÑÎßÌ×ÑÒ ÓßÔßÇÍ×ß Ð»¬®±²¿- Ì©·² ̱©»®-ô
̱©»® ï Õ«¿´¿ Ô«³°«® Ý·¬§ Ý»²¬®» ëððèè Õ«¿´¿ Ô«³°«® ÓßÔßÇÍ×ß
̸» ³¿®µ ½±²-·-¬- ±º ̸» ¼»-·¹² °±®¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ³¿®µ ¬± ¬¸» ®·¹¸¬ ±º ¬¸» ©±®¼ þÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍþ ·- ¬¸»
º¿²½·º«´ ®»°®»-»²¬¿¬·±² ±º ¿ ¼®±° ±º ±·´ ·² ¬¸» ½±´±® ¹®»»² ¿²¼ ¹®»»² ·- ½´¿·³»¼ ¿- ¿ °¿®¬ ±º ¬¸» ³¿®µò
ÌÎßÜÛÓßÎÕ
ÐÎ×ÒÝ×ÐßÔ
Ô×ÊÛ
|.HOME | SITE INDEX| SEARCH | eBUSINESS | HELP | PRIVACY POLICY
OPPAPP000128
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4010:9jc6p3.2.2
7/7/2010
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îè ±º íì
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Ex. D
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D)
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
OPPAPP000129
WhoIs Search Results
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Page 1 of 3
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»îç ±º íì
Ë-»®²¿³»ñÝ«-¬±³»® ý
п--©±®¼
Ý®»¿¬» ß½½±«²¬ ¤ Ú±®¹±¬ п--©±®¼ ¤ Í·¹² Ñ«¬
Domain
Auctions
Products
Domains
Hosting
Email
Websites
eCommerce
Business
Ü»¿´- ±º ¬¸» Ü¿§
Marketplace
SSL & Security
Support &
Community
Design
Resellers
PETRONAS
͸±© ß´´ Ó§ Ю±¼«½¬-
Check to add these alternate PETRONASTOWERS domain names.
.INFO üðòèçöñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ
.ORG üïìòççöñ§®
.ME üèòççñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ
.MOBI üêòççöñ§®
Check to add these similar PETRONASTOWERS.NET domain names.
THEÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍòòò
MYÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍòòòò
üèòççöñ§®
FREEÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎòòò
üèòççöñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ
BESTÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎòòò
üèòççöñ§®
SÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍòÒòòò
How to grow STEEL BALLS
(even if you're a woman)
üèòççöñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ
üèòççöñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ
òòòÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍSITEòÒÛÌ
üèòççöñ§®
ONLINEÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉòòò
üèòççöñ§®
þß³¿¦·²¹ ·¼»¿-ÿþ ó Ù¿®®»¬¬ Õò
òòòÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍONLINEòÒÛÌ
üèòççöñ§® ÍßÊÛÿ
Check to add these Premium domain names.
묮±²¿-Ô·º»-¬§´»ò½±³ üíôðððòðð
̱©»®ß¹»²¬ò½±³ üçççòðð
̱©»®Í¿´»-ò½±³ üçèèòðð
̱©»®-Ý´«¾ò½±³ üçððòðð
öд«- ×ÝßÒÒ º»» ±º üðòïè °»® ¼±³¿·² ²¿³» §»¿®ò
ööòÝß ¼±³¿·² ²¿³»- ©·´´ ¾» ®»¹·-¬»®»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸ Ù± Ü¿¼¼§ ܱ³¿·²- Ý¿²¿¼¿ô ײ½òô ¿ Ý×Îß ½»®¬·º·»¼ ®»¹·-¬®¿®ò
̸» ¼¿¬¿ ½±²¬¿·²»¼ ·² ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ô ײ½òù- ÉØÑ×Í ¼¿¬¿¾¿-»ô
©¸·´» ¾»´·»ª»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» ½±³°¿²§ ¬± ¾» ®»´·¿¾´»ô ·- °®±ª·¼»¼ þ¿- ·-þ
©·¬¸ ²± ¹«¿®¿²¬»» ±® ©¿®®¿²¬·»- ®»¹¿®¼·²¹ ·¬- ¿½½«®¿½§ò ̸··²º±®³¿¬·±² ·- °®±ª·¼»¼ º±® ¬¸» -±´» °«®°±-» ±º ¿--·-¬·²¹ §±«
·² ±¾¬¿·²·²¹ ·²º±®³¿¬·±² ¿¾±«¬ ¼±³¿·² ²¿³» ®»¹·-¬®¿¬·±² ®»½±®¼-ò
ß²§ «-» ±º ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ º±® ¿²§ ±¬¸»® °«®°±-» ·- »¨°®»--´§ º±®¾·¼¼»² ©·¬¸±«¬ ¬¸» °®·±® ©®·¬¬»²
°»®³·--·±² ±º ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ô ײ½ò Þ§ -«¾³·¬¬·²¹ ¿² ·²¯«·®§ô
§±« ¿¹®»» ¬± ¬¸»-» ¬»®³- ±º «-¿¹» ¿²¼ ´·³·¬¿¬·±²- ±º ©¿®®¿²¬§ò ײ °¿®¬·½«´¿®ô
§±« ¿¹®»» ²±¬ ¬± «-» ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ ¬± ¿´´±©ô »²¿¾´»ô ±® ±¬¸»®©·-» ³¿µ» °±--·¾´»ô
¼·--»³·²¿¬·±² ±® ½±´´»½¬·±² ±º ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ô ·² °¿®¬ ±® ·² ·¬- »²¬·®»¬§ô º±® ¿²§
°«®°±-»ô -«½¸ ¿- ¬¸» ¬®¿²-³·--·±² ±º «²-±´·½·¬»¼ ¿¼ª»®¬·-·²¹ ¿²¼
-±´·½·¬¿¬·±²- ±º ¿²§ µ·²¼ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ -°¿³ò DZ« º«®¬¸»® ¿¹®»»
²±¬ ¬± «-» ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ ¬± »²¿¾´» ¸·¹¸ ª±´«³»ô ¿«¬±³¿¬»¼ ±® ®±¾±¬·½ »´»½¬®±²·½
°®±½»--»- ¼»-·¹²»¼ ¬± ½±´´»½¬ ±® ½±³°·´» ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ º±® ¿²§ °«®°±-»ô
OPPAPP000130
http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.aspx?domain=petronastowers.net&prog_id=godaddy
7/7/2010
WhoIs Search Results
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Page 2 of 3
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»í𠱺 íì
·²½´«¼·²¹ ³·²·²¹ ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿ º±® §±«® ±©² °»®-±²¿´ ±® ½±³³»®½·¿´ °«®°±-»-ò
д»¿-» ²±¬»æ ¬¸» ®»¹·-¬®¿²¬ ±º ¬¸» ¼±³¿·² ²¿³» ·- -°»½·º·»¼
·² ¬¸» þ®»¹·-¬®¿²¬þ º·»´¼ò ײ ³±-¬ ½¿-»-ô ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ô ײ½ò
·- ²±¬ ¬¸» ®»¹·-¬®¿²¬ ±º ¼±³¿·² ²¿³»- ´·-¬»¼ ·² ¬¸·- ¼¿¬¿¾¿-»ò
λ¹·-¬®¿²¬æ
Ø»·µ± ͽ¸±»²»µ»-ÞÐÓ ïçëîîê
íéî Ñ´¼ ͬ®»»¼
Ô±²¼±²ô Ô±²¼±² ÛÝïÊ çßË
˲·¬»¼ Õ·²¹¼±³
λ¹·-¬»®»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸æ ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ô ײ½ò ø¸¬¬°æññ©©©ò¹±¼¿¼¼§ò½±³÷
ܱ³¿·² Ò¿³»æ ÐÛÌÎÑÒßÍÌÑÉÛÎÍòÒÛÌ
Ý®»¿¬»¼ ±²æ ðèóÓ¿§óðí
Û¨°·®»- ±²æ ðèóÓ¿§óïï
Ô¿-¬ Ë°¼¿¬»¼ ±²æ îíóÓ¿®óïð
ß¼³·²·-¬®¿¬·ª» ݱ²¬¿½¬æ
ͽ¸±»²»µ»--ô Ø»·µ± ½½Á´¬¼à´·ª»ò½±³
ÞÐÓ ïçëîîê
íéî Ñ´¼ ͬ®»»¼
Ô±²¼±²ô Ô±²¼±² ÛÝïÊ çßË
˲·¬»¼ Õ·²¹¼±³
õììòîðéêêíêêðê Ú¿¨ óó õììòîðéêêíêêðê
Ì»½¸²·½¿´ ݱ²¬¿½¬æ
ͽ¸±»²»µ»--ô Ø»·µ± ½½Á´¬¼à´·ª»ò½±³
ÞÐÓ ïçëîîê
íéî Ñ´¼ ͬ®»»¼
Ô±²¼±²ô Ô±²¼±² ÛÝïÊ çßË
˲·¬»¼ Õ·²¹¼±³
õììòîðéêêíêêðê Ú¿¨ óó õììòîðéêêíêêðê
ܱ³¿·² -»®ª»®- ·² ´·-¬»¼ ±®¼»®æ
ÒÍíçòÜÑÓß×ÒÝÑÒÌÎÑÔòÝÑÓ
ÒÍìðòÜÑÓß×ÒÝÑÒÌÎÑÔòÝÑÓ
λ¹·-¬®§ ͬ¿¬«-æ ½´·»²¬Ü»´»¬»Ð®±¸·¾·¬»¼
λ¹·-¬®§ ͬ¿¬«-æ ½´·»²¬Î»²»©Ð®±¸·¾·¬»¼
λ¹·-¬®§ ͬ¿¬«-æ ½´·»²¬Ì®¿²-º»®Ð®±¸·¾·¬»¼
λ¹·-¬®§ ͬ¿¬«-æ ½´·»²¬Ë°¼¿¬»Ð®±¸·¾·¬»¼
Í»» ˲¼»®´§·²¹ λ¹·-¬®§ Ü¿¬¿
λ°±®¬ ײª¿´·¼ ɸ±·-
Sign up for special offers:
Account Manager
Ó§ ß½½±«²¬
Ó§ λ²»©¿´Ó§ Ë°¹®¿¼»ß½½±«²¬ Í»¬¬·²¹Ý«-¬±³»® ײº±®³¿¬·±²
Ñ®¼»® Ø·-¬±®§
Ý®»¿¬» ß½½±«²¬
Û²¬»® §±«® »³¿·´ ¿¼¼®»-Shopping
Ѻº»® Ü·-½´¿·³»®Ü±³¿·² Í»¿®½¸
Ю±¼«½¬ Ý¿¬¿´±¹
Ю±¼«½¬ ß¼ª·-±®
Ù·º¬ Ý¿®¼Ù± Ü¿¼¼§ Ó±¾·´»
̱¼¿§ù- Ѻº»®-
Resources
É»¾³¿·´
ÉØÑ×Í -»¿®½¸
×ÝßÒÒ Ý±²º·®³¿¬·±²
ߺº·´·¿¬»Ý±²²»½¬ ©·¬¸ ËÙ¿¼¹»¬-ñÉ·¼¹»¬Ý±³³»®½·¿´ ݱ²¬»-¬
Í·¬» Ó¿°
Help and Support
Ì»´»°¸±²» Í«°°±®¬ ú Í¿´»Þ·´´·²¹ Í«°°±®¬
Û³¿·´ Ñ«® Í«°°±®¬ Ì»¿³
Ú®»¯«»²¬´§ ß-µ»¼ Ï«»-¬·±²Ü·-½«--·±² Ú±®«³Ë-»® Ù«·¼»Î»°±®¬ Í°¿³
Ì»-¬ Ñ«® Ю±¼«½¬-
About Go Daddy
Ý¿®»»®Í»½«®·¬§ Ý»²¬»®
ݱ³°¿²§ ײº±
Ò»©- Ý»²¬»®
̸» ͽ±±° ú Ϋ³±® ݱ
Ý«-¬±³»® Ì»-¬·³±²·¿´Ó¿®µ»¬·²¹ Ю±°±-¿´-
Ë-» ±º ¬¸·- Í·¬» ·- -«¾¶»½¬ ¬± »¨°®»-- Ì»®³- ±º Ë-»ò Þ§ «-·²¹ ¬¸·- Í·¬»ô §±« -·¹²·º§ ¬¸¿¬ §±« ¿¹®»» ¬± ¾» ¾±«²¼ ¾§ ¬¸»-» Ì»®³- ±º Ë-»
Ô»¹¿´ Ю·ª¿½§ б´·½§
OPPAPP000131
http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.aspx?domain=petronastowers.net&prog_id=godaddy
7/7/2010
WhoIs Search Results
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Page 3 of 3
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»íï ±º íì
ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ ·- ¬¸» ©±®´¼ù- Ò±ò ï ×ÝßÒÒó¿½½®»¼·¬»¼ ¼±³¿·² ²¿³» ®»¹·-¬®¿® º±® òÝÑÓô òÒÛÌô òÑÎÙô ò×ÒÚÑô òÞ×Æ ¿²¼ òËÍ ¼±³¿·²
ݱ°§®·¹¸¬ w ïççç ó îðïð ٱܿ¼¼§ò½±³ô ײ½ò ß´´ ®·¹¸¬- ®»-»®ª»¼ò
OPPAPP000132
http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.aspx?domain=petronastowers.net&prog_id=godaddy
7/7/2010
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»íî ±º íì
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Ex. E
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING DOMAIN NAME PURSUANT TO 15
U.S.C. § 1125(D)
AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: 10-CV-03052 PJH
OPPAPP000133
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»íí ±º íì
OPPAPP000134
Ý¿-»ìæïðó½ªóðíðëîóÐÖØ Ü±½«³»²¬ç
Ú·´»¼ðèñïðñïð п¹»íì ±º íì
OPPAPP000135
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?