Streetspace, Inc v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 31

RESPONSE in Opposition re 29 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel for Millennial Media (Cooley LLP) MOTION to Disqualify Counsel for Millennial Media (Cooley LLP) filed by Millennial Media, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Chris C. Campbell, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Campbell Declaration, # 3 Declaration of Patrick A. Doody, # 4 Declaration of Kevin Todd Duncan, # 5 Declaration of Nelson Kuan, # 6 Exhibit A to Kuan Declaration, # 7 Exhibit B to Kuan Declaration, # 8 Exhibit C to Kuan Declaration, # 9 Exhibit D to Kuan Declaration, # 10 Exhibit E to Kuan Declaration, # 11 Exhibit F to Kuan Declaration, # 12 Exhibit G to Kuan Declaration, # 13 Exhibit H to Kuan Declaration, # 14 Exhibit I to Kuan Declaration, # 15 Exhibit J to Kuan Declaration, # 16 Exhibit K to Kuan Declaration, # 17 Exhibit L to Kuan Declaration, # 18 Exhibit M to Kuan Declaration, # 19 Exhibit N to Kuan Declaration, # 20 Exhibit O to Kuan Declaration, # 21 Exhibit P to Kuan Declaration)(Kyle, John) (kaj).

EXHIBIT I

Application No.

09/959,654

Interview Summary

Applicant(s)
MATHAL ET AL.

I-=-~----"

Examiner

,---+---:-::--:-:--::---,.--------1

Jacques Veillard

Art Unit

2175

All participants (applicant, applicant's representative, PTO personnel):

(1) Trevor Coddington (Reg. No.4a13(~).

(3)_ _ .

~

(~)

Jacques Veillard.

(4)_ _ .

Date of Interview: 12 May 2004.
Type: a)[gI Telephonic b)O Video Conference
c)O Personal [copy given to: 1)0 applicant
Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted:
If Yes, brief description: _ _ .

d)O Yes

2)0 applicant's representative]
e)O No.

Claim(s) discussed: 1,2,9,14,20 and 27-42.
Identification of prior art discussed: NONE.
Agreement with respect to the claims f)[gI was reached. 9)0 was not reached. h)D N/A.
Substance of Interview including description of the general nature of what was agreed to if i":ll<jreement was
reached, or any other comments: Attorney Coddington (Reg. No. 46,633). on a telephonlc inlerviiew on 511212004.
authorizes the Examiner to mend claims 1.14,22. and cancel claims 2,9,20.27-42 by Examiner's amendment..
(A fuller description, if necessary, and a copy of the amendments which the examiner agreed would render the claims
allowable, if available, must be attached. Also, where no copy of the amendments that would render the claims
allowable is available, a summary thereof must be attached.)
THE FORMAL WRITTEN REPLY TO THE LAST OFFICE ACTION MUST INCLUDE THE SUBSTANCE OF THE
INTERVIEW. (See MPEP Section 713.04). If a reply to the last Office action has already been filed, APPLICANT IS
GIVEN ONE MONTH FROM THIS INTERVIEW DATE, OR THE MAILING DATE OF THIS INTERVIEW SUMMARY
FORM, WHICHEVER IS LATER, TO FILE A STATEMENT OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW. See
Summary of Record of Interview requirements on reverse side or on attached sheet.

v~~

Examiner Note: You must sign this form unless it is an
Attachment to a signed Office action.

Examiner's signature, if required

U.s. Patent and Trademark Office
PTOL-413 (Rev. 04-03)

Interview Summary

PaperNo.\!