State of California et al v. Trump et al

Filing 182

MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Department of Defense, David Bernhardt, Mark T. Esper, Steven T. Mnuchin, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Patrick M. Shanahan, Richard V. Spencer, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Treasury, United States of America, Heather Wilson. Responses due by 6/24/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit, # 11 Exhibit, # 12 Exhibit, # 13 Exhibit, # 14 Exhibit, # 15 Proposed Order)(Warden, Andrew) (Filed on 6/19/2019) Modified on 6/20/2019 (cpS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 2 3 4 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 6 7 8 9 No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG Plaintiffs, [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. 10 11 12 13 14 Before this Court are the parties’ respective Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. For the 15 reasons set forth in Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and the entire record 16 herein, it is hereby ORDERED that: 17 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED; and 18 2. Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to enter FINAL JUDGMENT for Defendants with respect 20 to all claims related to the funding and construction of the border barrier projects identified as El 21 Paso Sector Project 1 and El Centro Sector Project 1. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED 23 24 25 DATED: ______, 2019 _________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 26 27 28 State of California, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00872-HSG – Summary Judgment Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?