State of California et al v. Trump et al
Filing
220
MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Re Section 2808 and NEPA filed by Commonwealth of Virginia, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Hawaii, State of Maryland, State of New Mexico, State of New York, State of Oregon, State of Wisconsin. Motion Hearing set for 11/20/2019 10:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 10/25/2019. Replies due by 11/1/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix of Declarations re: Environmental Harms, # 2 Declaration of Colonel William Green, # 3 Declaration of Alison Lynn Reaser, # 4 Declaration of Heather Leslie, # 5 Request for Judicial Notice ISO Mot for Partial Summary Judgment Re Section 2808 and NEPA, # 6 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, # 7 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Leslie, Heather) (Filed on 10/11/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
ROBERT W. BYRNE
SALLY MAGNANI
MICHAEL L. NEWMAN
Senior Assistant Attorneys General
MICHAEL P. CAYABAN
CHRISTINE CHUANG
EDWARD H. OCHOA
Supervising Deputy Attorneys General
BRIAN BILFORD
SPARSH KHANDESHI
LEE I. SHERMAN
JANELLE M. SMITH
JAMES F. ZAHRADKA II
HEATHER C. LESLIE (SBN 305095)
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 305095
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 210-7832
Fax: (916) 327-2319
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of California
13
14
15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
OAKLAND DIVISION
17
18
19
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.;
20
Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF COLONEL
WILLIAM GREEN IN SUPPORT OF
v.
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT re: SECTION
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity 2808 AND NEPA
as President of the United States of America;
Date:
November 20, 2019
et al.;
Time:
10:00 am
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam,
Defendants. Judge:
Jr.
Trial Date:
None Set
Action Filed: February 18, 2019
21
22
23
24
25
Case No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG
26
27
28
Decl. of Col. William Green ISO Mot. for Summary Judgment re: Section 2808 and NEPA (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)
1
I, Col. William Green, declare as follows:
2
1.
3
4
I have personal knowledge of each fact stated in this declaration, and if called as a
witness could competently testify thereto.
2.
I am a Colonel with the California Air National Guard (ANG) and currently serve as
5
the California ANG’s Director of Operations. In this capacity, I advise the Adjutant General and
6
other California Military Department senior leaders on federal issues affecting the State of
7
California. Additionally, I advise the Commander of the California ANG on the readiness of over
8
4800 military and civilian personnel across five wings and ensure that they are postured and
9
prepared to support national defense requirements and emergency response, relief and recovery
10
operations throughout the State of California. I am also a command pilot with more than 6000
11
military and civilian flying hours in the C-130J, WC130J, EC-130J, B-787, S80, B727, T-38, T-
12
37 and T-41 aircraft. I have accrued over 400 combat hours in the tactical environment in support
13
of multiple deployments. I have served as a C-130J Instructor Pilot and a C-130J Command
14
Evaluator Pilot. I am also an instructor and designated Subject Matter Expert with respect to the
15
Modular Aerial Fire Fighting System (MAFFS).
16
3.
The California ANG is a component of the California National Guard, a federally
17
funded California military force that is part of the National Guard of the United States. The
18
California National Guard is the second largest National Guard force in the United States with a
19
total authorized strength of over 23,000 soldiers and airmen. The Constitution of the United
20
States charges the National Guard with dual federal and state missions.
21
4.
The California ANG is comprised of citizen airmen that fill the ranks of five air
22
wings strategically positioned across California to support the state and nation in times of need.
23
The California ANG’s highly specialized servicemen and women leverage a variety of aviation
24
platforms and combat tested expertise to perform a full spectrum of missions. Their missions
25
include providing homeland air defense for all of the Western United States and providing direct
26
support to combatant commanders overseas, as well as assisting in search and rescue missions
27
along the Pacific Coast and combatting wildfires throughout the state of California and throughout
28
the United States.
1
Decl. of Col. William Green ISO Mot. for Summary Judgment re Section 2808 and NEPA (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)
1
5.
The California ANG’s 146th Airlift Wing is part of the reserve component of the
2
United States Air Force supporting Air Mobility Command and is headquartered at the Channel
3
Islands Air National Guard Base (ANGB) in Port Hueneme, California. The 146th Airlift Wing is
4
a combat ready organization prepared to support the U.S. and allied forces, as well as provide
5
disaster response, humanitarian relief, and large scale aerial firefighting capabilities to the state of
6
California and the nation.
7
6.
The 146th Airlift Wing employs the Lockheed C-130J “Super Hercules” aircraft. The
8
146th Airlift Wing’s tactical airlift mission is one of the most training-intensive in the Mobility
9
Air Forces.
10
7.
In addition to standard military flight training, the 146th Airlift Wing is responsible to
11
train to its demanding aerial firefighting mission. The 146th Airlift Wing is one of only four units
12
in the country equipped with MAFFS, an integrated airborne delivery system for battling large
13
fires. The MAFFS modules, which are loaded into the cargo bays of the C-130J aircraft, are
14
capable of discharging 3,000 gallons of water or fire retardant in less than five seconds, covering
15
an area a quarter mile long by 100 feet, specializing in large fire containment operations.
16
8.
As part of the California ANG’s function in responding to state emergencies, the 146th
17
Airlift Wing is frequently called-up to combat wildfires in California and the western United
18
States. Over the past six years, they have been activated 11 times, performing over 775 fire drops
19
supporting efforts to combat 45 different wildfires. These have included large and increasingly
20
common destructive incidents in California, such as the Rim, Thomas, Mendocino Complex, Carr
21
and recent Woolsey fires. The 2018 fire season was the largest and most destructive in California
22
history.
23
9.
With the exception of flights within combat zones where anti-aircraft defenses are
24
present, the firefighting mission presents the greatest risk to the 146th Airlift Wing C-130J
25
aircrew. This is because the firefighting mission requires the C-130J pilots to fly aircraft at lower
26
than standard altitudes, slow air speeds and nonstandard configurations in order to deliver
27
retardant in the prescribed manner. Additionally, these flights often take place in mountainous
28
2
Decl. of Col. William Green ISO Mot. for Summary Judgment re Section 2808 and NEPA (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)
1
terrain with reduced visibility and rapidly changing weather conditions. The mission also requires
2
California C-130J flight crews to train and operate with civil agency partners that fly dissimilar
3
aircraft, such as the United States Forest Service (USFS) and the California Department of
4
Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire).
5
10.
I am familiar with the training requirements for airmen piloting the C-130J aircraft.
6
In addition to monthly ground and in-flight training, C-130J aircrew are required to participate in
7
at least one week of refresher simulator training emphasizing complex emergency procedures,
8
challenging and unusual aircraft maneuvers and crew coordination at a certified C-130J flight
9
simulator on annual basis. Aircrew from the 146th Airlift Wing currently travel to Keesler Air
10
Force Base in Biloxi, Mississippi, at an approximate cost of $360,000 annually, to accomplish
11
this simulator training.
12
11.
C-130J flight crews also participate in an annual, one-week training course relating to
13
firefighting missions. This one-week training course, which includes flight training and water
14
drops, is coordinated with the USFS. Similar to actual firefighting missions, the training often
15
takes place over mountainous terrain, at lower-than-normal altitudes and at slow air speeds.
16
12.
Rising aircraft sustainment costs, extensive flight training requirements and limited
17
military budgets inspired military acquisition of the C-130J flight simulators, which are designed
18
to provide realistic training at a fraction of the cost of actual aircraft flight operations.
19
13.
Flight simulators have been installed or programmed for installation at all C-130J
20
mobility air bases to meet current and future training demands. Based on currently scheduled
21
installation dates, in 2022, Channel Islands ANGB will be the only remaining C-130J base in the
22
Mobility Air Forces without a flight simulator.
23
14. The C-130J flight simulator is designed to provide the majority of all initial, mission,
24
continuation and upgrade C-130J training. Command training managers estimate that on site
25
simulators account for approximately 40% of all training requirements previously conducted in
26
the aircraft alone. This reduced training demand on the aircraft has resulted in increased
27
availability for required maintenance and operational missions.
28
3
Decl. of Col. William Green ISO Mot. for Summary Judgment re Section 2808 and NEPA (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)
1
15.
During the FY2019 budgeting cycle, after undergoing the lengthy process to evaluate
2
and prioritize proposed military construction projects, Congress appropriated $8,000,000 for the
3
purpose of constructing a facility at the Channel Islands ANGB to house a C-130J flight
4
simulator, which was secured by the U.S. Air Force’s Air Mobility Command at a cost of
5
$29,000,000. Initial efforts by California ANG to secure the simulator began over ten years ago.
6
16.
The California ANG anticipates delivery of the C-130J flight simulator at the
7
Channel Islands ANGB in March 2022. However, the Channel Islands ANGB cannot receive a
8
fully functional simulator unless and until the simulator facility is constructed.
9
17.
Access to the flight simulator at the Channel Islands ANGB is essential because it
10
would provide the 146th Airlift Wing’s flight crews with realistic flight training opportunities
11
without the expense or risks associated with flight training in the aircraft. In fact, the simulator
12
was specifically designed to provide the most realistic training simulation of all critical mission
13
sets for two California C-130J units. It is fully reconfigurable to support both the tactical airlift
14
mission of the 146th Airlift Wing at Channel Islands Air National Guard Station, as well as the
15
aerial refueling mission of the 129th Rescue Wing at Moffett Field in Sunnyvale, California. It is
16
also scheduled to be modified in 2024, to network with other flight simulators around the world
17
allowing aircrew at Channel Islands ANGB to participate in large, complex integrated training
18
scenarios and exercises without ever leaving home station. It can also be used to train aircrew
19
whenever new software modifications are employed on the aircraft.
20
18.
Finally, the flight simulator at the Channel Islands ANGB would include an enhanced
21
software suite that simulates aerial firefighting, one of California’s most critical domestic threats.
22
This training capability is significant because, as noted, the firefighting mission is extremely
23
challenging and the threat of large wild fires remains high. The flight simulator would enable the
24
California ANG to provide its C-130J flight crews with firefighting-specific training in
25
circumstances that simulate these dangerous conditions. Importantly, the California ANG would
26
be able to augment its annual week-long aerial firefighting training program, greatly enhancing
27
mission proficiency and thereby improving the California ANG’s ability to safely and effectively
28
respond to wildfire threats.
4
Decl. of Col. William Green ISO Mot. for Summary Judgment re Section 2808 and NEPA (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)
1
19.
With the availability of higher-paying commercial aviation jobs, it is becoming
2
increasingly difficult for the California ANG to retain aircrew with the requisite experience
3
necessary to participate safely in its firefighting mission. The availability of enhanced aerial
4
firefighting training in a flight simulator is particularly important to the California ANG because
5
it would allow the 146th Airlift Wing to introduce aerial firefighting training to all of its air crews,
6
regardless of experience, in a safe, efficient and effective manner. With additional training
7
opportunities made possible through the use of a flight simulator, it would also accelerate the
8
development of crews with less firefighting experience, which helps offset the loss of experienced
9
aerial firefighters leaving the organization for careers with commercial airlines.
10
20.
Recently, the California Military Department was advised that $8,000,000 in funds to
11
construct a C-130J Simulator Facility at the Channel Islands ANGB were being diverted to other
12
executive branch projects.
13
21.
Over the past several years, large, rapidly-moving wildfires have become increasingly
14
common in California. Aircraft equipped with firefighting systems, such as the C-130J equipped
15
with the MAFFS, have proven to be essential tools in protecting Californians and their
16
communities by slowing the spread of these massive wildfires. Use of aerial firefighting tools aid
17
firefighters on the ground attempting to contain these fires and often give citizens needed time to
18
escape dangerous areas. Aerial firefighting has saved lives and property.
19
22.
The additional simulator training was intended to ensure mission preparedness and
20
minimize the costs and risks associated with the robust flight training requirements associated
21
with the tactical combat airlift mission. The availability of a C-130J flight simulator at the
22
Channel Islands ANGB would have permitted the California ANG to provide its aircrews with
23
more combat mission training and more training specific to firefighting missions throughout the
24
year.
25
23.
As a consequence of the decision to defund the project to construct the facility that is
26
needed to house the C-130J flight simulator, the California ANG’s C-130J flight crews will not
27
receive the intended benefits of the additional simulator training throughout the year and the 146th
28
5
Decl. of Col. William Green ISO Mot. for Summary Judgment re Section 2808 and NEPA (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)
1
Airlift Wing’s flight crews will receive less training in aerial firefighting than they would have
2
following receipt of the simulator.
3
24.
Also, because the availability of flight simulator training would have offset the loss
4
of experienced aerial firefighters to the commercial airlines, the defunding of the flight simulator
5
facility would also make it more difficult for the 146th Airlift Wing to maintain its current level
6
of aerial firefighting experience potentially impacting its ability to meet increasing mission
7
demands.
8
25. Accordingly, the defunding of this project will have significant negative impacts on
9
the Channel Island ANGB’s operations, placing at risk the California ANG’s ability to maintain
10
its current level of effectiveness in responding to the growing threat of California wildfires and
11
causing a potential increased risk to public health and safety of Californians and their
12
communities.
13
14
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this
declaration was executed on October 10, 2019, in Port Hueneme, California.
15
16
17
____________________________
WILLIAM C. GREEN, Jr., Colonel CA ANG
Director of Operations
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Decl. of Col. William Green ISO Mot. for Summary Judgment re Section 2808 and NEPA (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?