State of California et al v. Trump et al

Filing 57

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To enlarge page limits in support of motion for injunctive relief filed by State of California. Responses due by 4/18/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration of Lee Sherman, # 3 Notice of Motion & Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 4 Proposed Order, # 5 Appendix of Declarations re: TFF, # 6 Appendix of Declarations re: Environmental, # 7 Request for Judicial Notice, # 8 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 4/4/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; STATE OF HAWAII; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF OREGON; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; STATE OF VERMONT; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; and STATE OF WISCONSIN; Case No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF STATES’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED APPLICABLE PAGE LIMITS FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Judge: Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Trial Date: None Set Action Filed: February 18, 2019 21 Plaintiffs, 22 v. 23 24 25 26 27 28 DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; PATRICK M. SHANAHAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense; MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army; RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his [Proposed] Order Granting Pls.’ Admin. Mot. to Exceed Applicable Page Limits (4:19-cv-00872-HSG) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 official capacity as Secretary of the Navy; HEATHER WILSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; Defendants. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order Granting Pls.’ Admin. Mot. to Exceed Applicable Page Limits (4:19-cv-00872-HSG) 1 On April 4, 2019, Plaintiff States filed an Administrative Motion to Exceed Applicable 2 Page Limits under N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 7-11 for an order authorizing them to file an 3 oversize brief in excess of the page limit in support of their Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 4 which was filed as an attachment to the Administrative Motion. Plaintiff States request an 5 additional 10 pages—or 35 pages total—for their preliminary injunction motion. The applicable 6 rule (N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 7-2) would limit the preliminary injunction motion to 25 pages. 7 The Court has considered Plaintiff States’ Administrative Motion to Exceed Applicable 8 Page Limits and documents filed therewith, and all of the papers on file in this action, and hereby 9 GRANTS Plaintiff States’ Administrative Motion. 10 Now, therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that: 11 Plaintiff States may file a Motion for Preliminary Injunction up to 35 pages in length, and 12 Plaintiff States’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction that is attached to the Administrative Motion 13 to Exceed Applicable Page Limits is deemed filed on April 4, 2019. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: __________________ 17 __________________________________ The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order Granting Pls.’ Admin. Mot. to Exceed Applicable Page Limits (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?