State of California et al v. Trump et al
Filing
57
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To enlarge page limits in support of motion for injunctive relief filed by State of California. Responses due by 4/18/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration of Lee Sherman, # 3 Notice of Motion & Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 4 Proposed Order, # 5 Appendix of Declarations re: TFF, # 6 Appendix of Declarations re: Environmental, # 7 Request for Judicial Notice, # 8 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 4/4/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF
COLORADO; STATE OF
CONNECTICUT; STATE OF
DELAWARE; STATE OF HAWAII;
STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF
MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND;
COMMONWEALTH OF
MASSACHUSETTS; ATTORNEY
GENERAL DANA NESSEL ON BEHALF
OF THE PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN;
STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF
NEVADA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY;
STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF
NEW YORK; STATE OF OREGON;
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; STATE OF
VERMONT; COMMONWEALTH OF
VIRGINIA; and STATE OF WISCONSIN;
Case No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF STATES’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
EXCEED APPLICABLE PAGE LIMITS
FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Judge:
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam,
Jr.
Trial Date:
None Set
Action Filed: February 18, 2019
21
Plaintiffs,
22
v.
23
24
25
26
27
28
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity
as President of the United States of America;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; PATRICK
M. SHANAHAN, in his official capacity as
Acting Secretary of Defense; MARK T.
ESPER, in his official capacity as Secretary of
the Army; RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his
[Proposed] Order Granting Pls.’ Admin. Mot. to Exceed Applicable Page Limits (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
official capacity as Secretary of the Navy;
HEATHER WILSON, in her official capacity
as Secretary of the Air Force; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;
STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, in his official
capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR;
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity
as Acting Secretary of the Interior; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, in
her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland
Security;
Defendants.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Pls.’ Admin. Mot. to Exceed Applicable Page Limits (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)
1
On April 4, 2019, Plaintiff States filed an Administrative Motion to Exceed Applicable
2
Page Limits under N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 7-11 for an order authorizing them to file an
3
oversize brief in excess of the page limit in support of their Motion for Preliminary Injunction,
4
which was filed as an attachment to the Administrative Motion. Plaintiff States request an
5
additional 10 pages—or 35 pages total—for their preliminary injunction motion. The applicable
6
rule (N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 7-2) would limit the preliminary injunction motion to 25 pages.
7
The Court has considered Plaintiff States’ Administrative Motion to Exceed Applicable
8
Page Limits and documents filed therewith, and all of the papers on file in this action, and hereby
9
GRANTS Plaintiff States’ Administrative Motion.
10
Now, therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that:
11
Plaintiff States may file a Motion for Preliminary Injunction up to 35 pages in length, and
12
Plaintiff States’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction that is attached to the Administrative Motion
13
to Exceed Applicable Page Limits is deemed filed on April 4, 2019.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: __________________
17
__________________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[Proposed] Order Granting Pls.’ Admin. Mot. to Exceed Applicable Page Limits (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?