Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.
Filing
188
Attachment 5
Declaration of Ajay S. Krishnan
In Support of Counter-Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Counter-Plaintiff ABWF To Satisfy Outstanding Discovery Obligations filed byGoogle Inc., Google Inc.. (Attachments: #
1 #
2 #
3 #
4 #
5 #
6 #
7 #
8 #
9 #
10 #
11 #
12 #
13 #
14 #
15 #
16 #
17 #
18 #
19)(Krishnan, Ajay) (Filed on 9/7/2006)
Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.
. ..' .
Doc. 188 Att. 5
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
Document 188-6
Filed 09/07/2006
Page 1 of 6
.' "
...
. . ... ..'
. '... "'.
. '. . . . .' .' .'.. ... .
.
...
. ..
.. ..
. . .' .
..
.. . . '. ... .. .
... . . .'. . .'.:.....'. .~'. . .. ... ..'.. .. ' . ,". . '. .... . ..
. . ..... ..
... ................ ........Exhibit E.
, " . ," . . . . .. ," ,".'. . . . ~ '. '.' " . . .
. .~. '.. .' .: . ." . . . . .'
", ...... ':, -',.""" -..... ..:", : -'-::'", -.' ~"" ~": .~ .:.' .: "...: '. .. '. '. ¿" . . :" ',..,..: ...... '..:,.': ':.
. ".' '.." . :' ':.:'.:... . ~ . ,"' ...' . . .' .... .' . '.' .
", '.... ."', '; : ..... '. ..... ", '. :.....::. .... '" : '. '.
....
. .'... .
,',_..",:.. . "'c,' '; ..... .,' ',.:. .,' ......:. . .... :,: . . . '. ": ~ ': .' . . . . :.' '. ~. . .
',." . .. . ", . -:', . '....' ...
. . .' :'.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
Document 188-6
Filed 09/07/2006
Page 2 of 6
1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP
MICHAL H. PAGE - #154913
2 MA A.
KLAUS H: HA - #224905
710 Sanome Street
LEMLEY -#155830
3 AlA Y S. KRSHNAN - #222476
4 San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
Telephone: (415) 391-5400 .
5 Facsimle: (415) 397-7188
6 Attorneys for Plaitiff and Counterdefendant
GO OGLE INC. and . 7 Thd-Par Defendats ASK JES, INC.
and EARTHIN, INC.
8
9
10
11
UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHRN DISTRCT OF CALIFORNIA
GOOGLE INC., a Delawar corporation,
12
13
Case No. C 03-5340-JF (EAI
Plaitiff
v.
PLAITIFF GOOGLE INC.'S FIRT SET
OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO
14
AMRIcAN BLIN & WALLPAPER
AMRICAN BLIN & WALLPAPER
15 FACtORY, INC., a
FACTORY, INC. .
Delaware corporation d//a decoratetoday.com, Inc. and DOES 1-
16 100, inclusive,
17
.'
Defendants.
FACTORY, INC., a Delaware coipration
18 AMRICAN BLIN & WALLPAPER
19 d//a decoratetoay.com, Inc.,
.21 v.
NETS
20 Counter Plaitiff,
CAPE COMMCATIONS
22 GOOGLE INC., AMRICA ONLIN, INC.,
23 CORPORATION, COMPUSERVE .INTERACTI SERVICES, INC., ASK
25
24 JEEVES, ING., and EARTH~ INC.,
Counter Defendants!
Thd-Part Defendats.
26 27 28
36622.01
GO
. Cas No. C 03~5340-JP (EAI)
OGLE'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO AMERICAN BLIN & WALLPAPER
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
Document 188-6
Filed 09/07/2006
Page 3 of 6
1 PROPOUNING PARTY:
2 RESPONDING PARTY:
3
PLAIFF EARTHIN, INC.
Defendant and Counter-Plainti AMRICAN
BLIN & WALLPAPER FAClORY,
INC.
SET NO.:
4
5 Puuat to Rule 36 of
ONE
the Federa Rules of Civil Proedure, Plaitiff
Google Inc. hereby
6 ,requests that Defendat and Counter-Plaiti American Blind ll. Walpaper Factory, Inc.
7 ("American Blind''), aIwer each of
the following Reques for Admssion separately and fully,
9 DEFITIONS
10 .
1.
8 in wrting and under oath, and serve a copy upn the undersigned counsel with th (30) days.
"AMRICAN BLIN" means American Blind, its subsidianes, divisions,
11 predecessor and successor companes, afliates, parents, any joint ventu to wmch it may be a .
12 pary, and/or each of its employees, ag.ents, offcers, directors, representatives, consultants,
13 accountants and attorneys, including any persn who sered in any such capacity at any time.
14
2.
"YOU," "YOUR/' and. any varåtions thereof refer to AMRICAN BLIND, its
15 subsidianes, divisions, predecessor and successor companes, affiliates, parnts, any joint
16' ventue to which it may he a pary, and/or each of its. employees, agents, officers, diectors,
17 representatives, constants, accountats and attorneys, including any persn who served in any
18 such capacity at, any time.
19
20 all
3.
The ter "ALæGED AMCAN BLIND MA" shall include anyone, and
of, the terms American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, America Blind Factory, America
21 Blind, American Blinds, Deratetoday, decoratetoday, and/or decoraetoday.com. .
22 4.. The tenn"BROAD MATCH KEYWORD" shall-mea a tenn that wil trgger an
23 ad on a Google seach resuts page when a user's query includes tht term, even if the quer
24 includes oter terms. A BROAD MATCH KEYWORD also will trgger an ad if
the usr's
. 25
query includes synonym, related phres, and plurals, even if the query does not conta the
26 precise BROAD MATCH KEYWORD itself.
27
28
1
3a6022.01
GOOGLE'S FIT
SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO AMRICAN BLIN & WALLPAPER Ca No. C 03-534()Jf (EAl) .
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
,...
Document 188-6
Filed 09/07/2006
Page 4 of 6
1
INSTRUCTONS
1.
2
Each response shal be preceded by the Request for Admssion to which it
3 respollds and shall be anwered separately and fully in wrtig mider oath, unless it is objected
4 to, in which event the reasn(s) for the objection shal be stated in lieu of that porton of
the
5 anwer to which the objection applies.
6
2.
All responses
to the'
Requests for Admission shal be signed by the person makng
7 them tld all objections signed by the attorney makg them mider the stdads set fort in
8 Federa Rule of Civil Procedure 11. No par of the Request
for Admission shall be left
that Reques.
9 unanswered merely because an objection lias been Inteipse to another par of
10
3.
If AMRICAN BLIN witholds inormation responsive, in whole or in par to
11 any Reques for Admssion on any bass, please identify: (a) any privilege or immunty from
12 discovery asserted;. (b) all documents or thgs which contain or refer to the inormation; (c) all
13 .ip.dividuals having knowledge of the inormation; (d) the subject matter and general natue of
the
14 inormation; and (e) all facts which are aleged to support the
asserton of
privilege or imunty.
15
4.
The obligation- to provide the inormation sought by these discovery requets, or
16 par thereof, is contiuing with the requiements ofFedera Rule of
Civil Procedure 26(e).
17 REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
18 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO.1:
19 Admit tht if an' ad appear on a Google search results page when a user searches for
20 "American Blind & Walpaper Factory" only bec.ause the advertiser has
selected "blind" as a
th ad does not include any vanant of
21 BROAD MATCH KEYWORD, and that if
the ALLEGED
22 AMRICAN BLIND MA in its text no ALLEGED AMRICAN BLIN MAS has
. 23 been "used" with the meang of the Laam Act.
24 REOUEST FOR ADMISSION NO.2:
25 Admit that if an ad appear on a Google searh results page when a user searches for
26 "american blind," the user has no way to determe for cert whether the ad's appearce was
27 trggered by the phras "american blind" or some other word or phr.
28
2
362201
GOOGLE'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO AMCAN
Cas No. C 03-5340-JF (EAI)
BLIND & WALLPAPER
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
Document 188-6
Filed 09/07/2006
.~ '.
Page 5 of 6
1 DATED: Januar 26, 2006
2
3
KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP
By:
4
5
S.' SHNAN A ey for Plaitif and Counterdefendant
GOOGLE INC.
6 7
8
EARTHIN INC. .
and Thd-Par Defendants ASK JEEVES, INC. and
9
10
11
12
13 14
15 16 17
1.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
-28
3602.01
3 GOOGLE'S FIT SET OF REQUEts FOR ADMISSION TO AMRICAN SLIND & WALAPER
Cae No. C 03-534()JF (E
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF
Document 188-6
Filed 09/07/2006
Page 6 of 6
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
.'
3
4
5
San Fracisc, State of Californa in the offce of a member of the bar of ths cour at whose diection the followig servce was made. i am over the age of eighteen year and not a par to the with action. My business addrss is Keker & Van Nest, LLP, 710 Sansome Stret, San Francisco, Calforna 94111. On January 26, 2006, I served the followig documents: I am employed in the City and County of
6 PLAITIFF COOGLE INC.'S FIT SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO AMRICAN BLIN & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC.
7
8
o
by A ITORNEY SERVICE, by placing a tre and corrct copy in a sealed envelope addrsed as shown
below, and dispatching a registered agent of proces with instctons to hand ca the above and mae
delivery to the followig durg normal busines hour, by leavig the package with the pern whose
9
10
11
name is shown or the persn autorid to accet courer deliveries on behalf of the addrsee.
Robert N. Philips, Es.
Howrey Simon Arold & Whte, LLP
12
13
525 Market Street, Suite 3600 san Fracisco, CA 94105-2708
o
by PDF TRSMISSION AN UNITED STATES MAl by transmitg- via PDF on ths date. A tre
and correct copy of same was placed in a sealed envelope addressed as shown. below. i am reily famliar
14
'15
Keker & Van Nest, LLP for collecon and processing of correspondence for mailig. Accordig to that practice, items are deposited wi the United Sttes Postl Servce at Sa Fracisco, California on that same day with postae thereon fuy prepaid. I am aware that, on motion of the par
with the practice of
served, service is presed invalid if the posta cacelltin date or the postge meter date is more than one'
day afer ile date of deposit for mailing stte iI ths affdavi.
16
17
18
19
Susan J. Greenspn, Esq. David A. Ramelt,.Esq. Kelley Dre & Waren LLP 333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, iL' 60606
Stephen E. Taylor, Esq.. . Taylor & Company Law Offces. Inc.
One Ferr Building .
Suite 355 San Fracisco, CA 94111-4209
20
sgreenspon(qkelleydre.com
drelt~keIIYdrve.com
penalty of peIur under the laws of the State of
stYlor~tcolaw.com
21 Executed on Janua 26,2006, at San 'Fracisco, Californa. I, Robert W. Thomas, declare under
. 22
Calforna that the above is tre and correc.
23
24
¡P.l.-,. 'w . -l ~ ct
Robert W. Thmas
25 26
27
28
33455.01
Prof Of Servce Case No. C 03-534lh (EI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?