Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Filing 188

Attachment 5
Declaration of Ajay S. Krishnan In Support of Counter-Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Counter-Plaintiff ABWF To Satisfy Outstanding Discovery Obligations filed byGoogle Inc., Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7 # 8 # 9 # 10 # 11 # 12 # 13 # 14 # 15 # 16 # 17 # 18 # 19)(Krishnan, Ajay) (Filed on 9/7/2006)

Download PDF
Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. . ..' . Doc. 188 Att. 5 Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 188-6 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 6 .' " ... . . ... ..' . '... "'. . '. . . . .' .' .'.. ... . . ... . .. .. .. . . .' . .. .. . . '. ... .. . ... . . .'. . .'.:.....'. .~'. . .. ... ..'.. .. ' . ,". . '. .... . .. . . ..... .. ... ................ ........Exhibit E. , " . ," . . . . .. ," ,".'. . . . ~ '. '.' " . . . . .~. '.. .' .: . ." . . . . .' ", ...... ':, -',.""" -..... ..:", : -'-::'", -.' ~"" ~": .~ .:.' .: "...: '. .. '. '. ¿" . . :" ',..,..: ...... '..:,.': ':. . ".' '.." . :' ':.:'.:... . ~ . ,"' ...' . . .' .... .' . '.' . ", '.... ."', '; : ..... '. ..... ", '. :.....::. .... '" : '. '. .... . .'... . ,',_..",:.. . "'c,' '; ..... .,' ',.:. .,' ......:. . .... :,: . . . '. ": ~ ': .' . . . . :.' '. ~. . . ',." . .. . ", . -:', . '....' ... . . .' :'. Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 188-6 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 6 1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP MICHAL H. PAGE - #154913 2 MA A. KLAUS H: HA - #224905 710 Sanome Street LEMLEY -#155830 3 AlA Y S. KRSHNAN - #222476 4 San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 . 5 Facsimle: (415) 397-7188 6 Attorneys for Plaitiff and Counterdefendant GO OGLE INC. and . 7 Thd-Par Defendats ASK JES, INC. and EARTHIN, INC. 8 9 10 11 UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHRN DISTRCT OF CALIFORNIA GOOGLE INC., a Delawar corporation, 12 13 Case No. C 03-5340-JF (EAI Plaitiff v. PLAITIFF GOOGLE INC.'S FIRT SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO 14 AMRIcAN BLIN & WALLPAPER AMRICAN BLIN & WALLPAPER 15 FACtORY, INC., a FACTORY, INC. . Delaware corporation d//a decoratetoday.com, Inc. and DOES 1- 16 100, inclusive, 17 .' Defendants. FACTORY, INC., a Delaware coipration 18 AMRICAN BLIN & WALLPAPER 19 d//a decoratetoay.com, Inc., .21 v. NETS 20 Counter Plaitiff, CAPE COMMCATIONS 22 GOOGLE INC., AMRICA ONLIN, INC., 23 CORPORATION, COMPUSERVE .INTERACTI SERVICES, INC., ASK 25 24 JEEVES, ING., and EARTH~ INC., Counter Defendants! Thd-Part Defendats. 26 27 28 36622.01 GO . Cas No. C 03~5340-JP (EAI) OGLE'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO AMERICAN BLIN & WALLPAPER Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 188-6 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 3 of 6 1 PROPOUNING PARTY: 2 RESPONDING PARTY: 3 PLAIFF EARTHIN, INC. Defendant and Counter-Plainti AMRICAN BLIN & WALLPAPER FAClORY, INC. SET NO.: 4 5 Puuat to Rule 36 of ONE the Federa Rules of Civil Proedure, Plaitiff Google Inc. hereby 6 ,requests that Defendat and Counter-Plaiti American Blind ll. Walpaper Factory, Inc. 7 ("American Blind''), aIwer each of the following Reques for Admssion separately and fully, 9 DEFITIONS 10 . 1. 8 in wrting and under oath, and serve a copy upn the undersigned counsel with th (30) days. "AMRICAN BLIN" means American Blind, its subsidianes, divisions, 11 predecessor and successor companes, afliates, parents, any joint ventu to wmch it may be a . 12 pary, and/or each of its employees, ag.ents, offcers, directors, representatives, consultants, 13 accountants and attorneys, including any persn who sered in any such capacity at any time. 14 2. "YOU," "YOUR/' and. any varåtions thereof refer to AMRICAN BLIND, its 15 subsidianes, divisions, predecessor and successor companes, affiliates, parnts, any joint 16' ventue to which it may he a pary, and/or each of its. employees, agents, officers, diectors, 17 representatives, constants, accountats and attorneys, including any persn who served in any 18 such capacity at, any time. 19 20 all 3. The ter "ALæGED AMCAN BLIND MA" shall include anyone, and of, the terms American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, America Blind Factory, America 21 Blind, American Blinds, Deratetoday, decoratetoday, and/or decoraetoday.com. . 22 4.. The tenn"BROAD MATCH KEYWORD" shall-mea a tenn that wil trgger an 23 ad on a Google seach resuts page when a user's query includes tht term, even if the quer 24 includes oter terms. A BROAD MATCH KEYWORD also will trgger an ad if the usr's . 25 query includes synonym, related phres, and plurals, even if the query does not conta the 26 precise BROAD MATCH KEYWORD itself. 27 28 1 3a6022.01 GOOGLE'S FIT SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO AMRICAN BLIN & WALLPAPER Ca No. C 03-534()Jf (EAl) . Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF ,... Document 188-6 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 4 of 6 1 INSTRUCTONS 1. 2 Each response shal be preceded by the Request for Admssion to which it 3 respollds and shall be anwered separately and fully in wrtig mider oath, unless it is objected 4 to, in which event the reasn(s) for the objection shal be stated in lieu of that porton of the 5 anwer to which the objection applies. 6 2. All responses to the' Requests for Admission shal be signed by the person makng 7 them tld all objections signed by the attorney makg them mider the stdads set fort in 8 Federa Rule of Civil Procedure 11. No par of the Request for Admission shall be left that Reques. 9 unanswered merely because an objection lias been Inteipse to another par of 10 3. If AMRICAN BLIN witholds inormation responsive, in whole or in par to 11 any Reques for Admssion on any bass, please identify: (a) any privilege or immunty from 12 discovery asserted;. (b) all documents or thgs which contain or refer to the inormation; (c) all 13 .ip.dividuals having knowledge of the inormation; (d) the subject matter and general natue of the 14 inormation; and (e) all facts which are aleged to support the asserton of privilege or imunty. 15 4. The obligation- to provide the inormation sought by these discovery requets, or 16 par thereof, is contiuing with the requiements ofFedera Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e). 17 REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION 18 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO.1: 19 Admit tht if an' ad appear on a Google search results page when a user searches for 20 "American Blind & Walpaper Factory" only bec.ause the advertiser has selected "blind" as a th ad does not include any vanant of 21 BROAD MATCH KEYWORD, and that if the ALLEGED 22 AMRICAN BLIND MA in its text no ALLEGED AMRICAN BLIN MAS has . 23 been "used" with the meang of the Laam Act. 24 REOUEST FOR ADMISSION NO.2: 25 Admit that if an ad appear on a Google searh results page when a user searches for 26 "american blind," the user has no way to determe for cert whether the ad's appearce was 27 trggered by the phras "american blind" or some other word or phr. 28 2 362201 GOOGLE'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO AMCAN Cas No. C 03-5340-JF (EAI) BLIND & WALLPAPER Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 188-6 Filed 09/07/2006 .~ '. Page 5 of 6 1 DATED: Januar 26, 2006 2 3 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP By: 4 5 S.' SHNAN A ey for Plaitif and Counterdefendant GOOGLE INC. 6 7 8 EARTHIN INC. . and Thd-Par Defendants ASK JEEVES, INC. and 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 -28 3602.01 3 GOOGLE'S FIT SET OF REQUEts FOR ADMISSION TO AMRICAN SLIND & WALAPER Cae No. C 03-534()JF (E Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 188-6 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 6 of 6 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 .' 3 4 5 San Fracisc, State of Californa in the offce of a member of the bar of ths cour at whose diection the followig servce was made. i am over the age of eighteen year and not a par to the with action. My business addrss is Keker & Van Nest, LLP, 710 Sansome Stret, San Francisco, Calforna 94111. On January 26, 2006, I served the followig documents: I am employed in the City and County of 6 PLAITIFF COOGLE INC.'S FIT SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO AMRICAN BLIN & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC. 7 8 o by A ITORNEY SERVICE, by placing a tre and corrct copy in a sealed envelope addrsed as shown below, and dispatching a registered agent of proces with instctons to hand ca the above and mae delivery to the followig durg normal busines hour, by leavig the package with the pern whose 9 10 11 name is shown or the persn autorid to accet courer deliveries on behalf of the addrsee. Robert N. Philips, Es. Howrey Simon Arold & Whte, LLP 12 13 525 Market Street, Suite 3600 san Fracisco, CA 94105-2708 o by PDF TRSMISSION AN UNITED STATES MAl by transmitg- via PDF on ths date. A tre and correct copy of same was placed in a sealed envelope addressed as shown. below. i am reily famliar 14 '15 Keker & Van Nest, LLP for collecon and processing of correspondence for mailig. Accordig to that practice, items are deposited wi the United Sttes Postl Servce at Sa Fracisco, California on that same day with postae thereon fuy prepaid. I am aware that, on motion of the par with the practice of served, service is presed invalid if the posta cacelltin date or the postge meter date is more than one' day afer ile date of deposit for mailing stte iI ths affdavi. 16 17 18 19 Susan J. Greenspn, Esq. David A. Ramelt,.Esq. Kelley Dre & Waren LLP 333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, iL' 60606 Stephen E. Taylor, Esq.. . Taylor & Company Law Offces. Inc. One Ferr Building . Suite 355 San Fracisco, CA 94111-4209 20 sgreenspon(qkelleydre.com drelt~keIIYdrve.com penalty of peIur under the laws of the State of stYlor~tcolaw.com 21 Executed on Janua 26,2006, at San 'Fracisco, Californa. I, Robert W. Thomas, declare under . 22 Calforna that the above is tre and correc. 23 24 ¡P.l.-,. 'w . -l ~ ct Robert W. Thmas 25 26 27 28 33455.01 Prof Of Servce Case No. C 03-534lh (EI)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?