Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1291

Statement (Joint) Regarding Use of Representative Products at Trial by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation). (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/23/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 3 4 APPLE, INC., a California Corporation 5 vs. 6 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, 7 LTD, a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG 8 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 9 York Corporation; SAMSUNG CN:11-CV-01846-LHK 10 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, 11 a Delaware Limited Liability Company. 12 ___________________________________/ 13 14 15 The videorecorded deposition of RAVIN 16 BALAKRISHNAN, PH.D., was held on Friday, April 20, 17 2012, commencing at 9:07 A.M., at the Law Offices of 18 Quinn Emanuel, 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 19 825, Washington, D.C., before Ronda J. Thomas, a 20 Notary Public. 21 22 23 REPORTED BY: 24 Ronda J. Thomas, RPR, CLR 25 JOB NO. 48807 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 77 1 A 11:05 What I said before is I'm accusing the 2 That's not quite what I said before. 11:05 3 particular products that are listed in paragraph 37, 11:05 4 running those particular applications that I examined 11:05 5 in counsel's office and every other product out there 11:05 6 that is of the same model and version of software and 11:05 7 hardware, and also, I've looked at the code for each of 11:05 8 these that are in the family of code and any device of 11:05 9 the same type that's running that same chunk of code 11:05 would also infringe. 11:05 10 11 12 13 14 (Balakrishnan Exhibit 5 was marked for purposes of identification.) Q Tab 7.0. 16 MR. JOHNSON: 17 MR. BUSEY: 20 21 22 This is Exhibit 5? Right. Could I see that just a moment? 11:06 11:06 You've accused the Browser feature of this particular device of infringing, right? A 11:06 11:06 Thank you. Q 11:06 11:06 MR. BUSEY: 19 11:05 I'm going to mark, as Exhibit 5, a Galaxy 15 18 11:05 And you're representing this is the Galaxy Tab 7.0? 11:07 11:07 11:07 11:07 23 Q You tell me what it is. 11:07 24 A It says Galaxy Tab. 11:07 25 It looks like the 7.0, but you can't tell whether, can't 100 percent tell TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 11:07 Page 78 1 without the box. 11:07 2 Q Yeah, it's the 7.0. 11:07 3 A Okay. 11:07 4 Q So you've accused the Browser feature of 11:07 5 6 infringing in this particular device, right? A I've accused it in the device I saw at 11:08 11:08 7 counsel's office -- sorry, Apple's counsel's office -- 11:08 8 and to the extent it's the same device on the same 11:08 9 software, it would infringe. 11:08 10 Q Okay. Well, take a look at the Browser 11:08 11 function on, on this particular device, and this is the 11:08 12 way it came out of the box. 11:08 13 14 And I want to ask you whether this particular Browser function infringes the '381 patent? 15 16 11:08 11:08 (Witness reading.) So this particular version of the Browser 11:13 A 11:11 17 that I'm looking at on this Galaxy Tab appears to do a 11:13 18 hard stop instead of the functionality of the '381 11:13 19 patent. 11:13 20 Q And you don't know what version of Browser 11:13 21 you looked at on the Galaxy Tab that's referenced in 11:13 22 your report? 11:13 A 11:13 23 24 25 As I said, it was the default Browser that came on the device. Q 11:13 You don't know what that is, though? TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 11:13

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?