Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1291
Statement (Joint) Regarding Use of Representative Products at Trial by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation). (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/23/2012)
EXHIBIT 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
jtaylor@mofo.com
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
atucher@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
jasonbartlett@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
11
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No.
170151)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
APPLE INC.,
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
19
Plaintiff,
20
v.
21
22
23
24
25
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING USE OF
REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS
AT TRIAL
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Defendant.
26
27
28
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL
11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG)
[Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2
07/21/2012 06:07 AM
1
2
3
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to streamline the presentation of evidence in connection with
certain issues to be addressed at trial;
4
WHEREAS, to facilitate the use of representative products at trial, Apple agrees that it
5
will not accuse the ThinkFree Office application, which is on certain accused products, but not
6
others, of infringement;
7
8
9
10
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the
parties that:
1.
For purposes of assessing infringement of the asserted claim of United States
Patent No. 7,469,381:
11
(a) the Galaxy S II (AT&T) is representative of the Galaxy S II (i9100);
12
(b) the Exhibit 4G is representative of the Galaxy Ace;
13
(c) the Galaxy S 4G is representative of the Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge,
14
Epic 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy S (i9000), Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Sidekick,
15
and Vibrant;
16
(d) the Nexus S 4G is representative of the Nexus S and Replenish;
17
(e) the Galaxy Tab 10.1 is representative of the Galaxy Tab 7.0; and
18
(f) the Gem and Prevail will be assessed separately.
19
2.
If Apple proves that a representative product in sections 1(a) through 1(e) infringes
20
the asserted claim of the ’381 patent, such proof will constitute proof that all the products
21
identified within that particular section infringe the asserted claim.
22
3.
If Apple fails to prove that a representative product in sections 1(a) through 1(e)
23
infringes the asserted claim of the ’381 patent, such failure of proof will constitute proof that all
24
the products identified within that particular section do not infringe the asserted claim.
25
26
4.
For purposes of assessing infringement of the asserted claim of United States
Patent No. 7,864,163:
27
(a) the Galaxy S II (AT&T) is representative of the Acclaim, Captivate,
28
Continuum, Droid Charge, Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy S (i9000),
STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL – DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
1
11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG)
[Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2
07/21/2012 06:07 AM
1
2
Galaxy S II (i9100), Galaxy S II (T-Mobile), Galaxy S 4G, Gem, Indulge, Infuse
3
4G, Intercept, Mesmerize, Sidekick, Transform, and Vibrant;
4
(b) the Nexus S 4G is representative of the Epic 4G, Galaxy Prevail, Nexus S, and
5
Replenish; and
6
(c) the Galaxy Tab 7.0 and Galaxy Tab 10.1 will be assessed separately.
7
5.
If Apple proves that a representative product in sections 4(a) through 4(b)
8
infringes the asserted claim of the ’163 patent, such proof will constitute proof that all the
9
products identified within that particular section infringe the asserted claim.
10
6.
If Apple attempts to prove, but fails to prove, that a representative product in
11
sections 4(a) through 4(b) infringes the asserted claim of the ’163 patent, such failure of proof
12
will constitute proof that all the products identified within that particular section do not infringe
13
the asserted claim.
14
7.
15
For purposes of assessing infringement of the asserted claim of United States
Patent No. 7,844,915:
16
(a) the Galaxy S II (AT&T) is representative of the Acclaim, Captivate,
17
Continuum, Droid Charge, Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy S (i9000),
18
Galaxy S II (i9100), Galaxy S II (T-Mobile), Galaxy S 4G, Gem, Indulge, Infuse
19
4G, Intercept, Mesmerize, Sidekick, Transform, and Vibrant;
20
(b) the Nexus S 4G is representative of the Epic 4G, Galaxy Prevail, Nexus S, and
21
Replenish; and
22
(c) the Galaxy Tab 7.0 and Galaxy Tab 10.1 will be assessed separately.
23
8.
If Apple proves that a representative product in sections 7(a) through 7(b)
24
infringes the asserted claim of the ’915 patent, such proof will constitute proof that all the
25
products identified within that particular section infringe the asserted claim.
26
9.
If Apple attempts to prove, but fails to prove, that a representative product in
27
sections 7(a) through 7(b) infringes the asserted claim of the ’915 patent, such failure of proof
28
will constitute proof that all the products identified within that particular section do not infringe
the asserted claim.
STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL
11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG)
[Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2
2
07/21/2012 06:07 AM
1
2
3
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: July 20, 2012
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
By:_______________________________
By:________________________________
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
EDWARD DEFRANCO
MICHAEL T. ZELLER
5
6
7
10
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
ALISON M. TUCHER
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
JASON R. BARTLETT
11
Attorneys for APPLE INC.
8
9
12
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL
11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG)
[Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2
3
07/21/2012 06:07 AM
1
2
ORDER
3
4
Based on the foregoing stipulation,
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated:
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL – DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
1
11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG)
[Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2
07/21/2012 06:07 AM
1
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
2
3
4
5
I, Michael A. Jacobs, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Victoria Maroulis
has concurred in this filing.
6
7
Dated: July __, 2012
/s/
Michael A. Jacobs
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL
11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG)
[Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2
2
07/21/2012 06:07 AM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?