Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1291

Statement (Joint) Regarding Use of Representative Products at Trial by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation). (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/23/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.com ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) atucher@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. 11 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151) 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129) Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603) 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417) 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 APPLE INC., Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 22 23 24 25 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING USE OF REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant. 26 27 28 DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL 11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG) [Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2 07/21/2012 06:07 AM 1 2 3 WHEREAS, the Parties wish to streamline the presentation of evidence in connection with certain issues to be addressed at trial; 4 WHEREAS, to facilitate the use of representative products at trial, Apple agrees that it 5 will not accuse the ThinkFree Office application, which is on certain accused products, but not 6 others, of infringement; 7 8 9 10 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the parties that: 1. For purposes of assessing infringement of the asserted claim of United States Patent No. 7,469,381: 11 (a) the Galaxy S II (AT&T) is representative of the Galaxy S II (i9100); 12 (b) the Exhibit 4G is representative of the Galaxy Ace; 13 (c) the Galaxy S 4G is representative of the Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, 14 Epic 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy S (i9000), Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Sidekick, 15 and Vibrant; 16 (d) the Nexus S 4G is representative of the Nexus S and Replenish; 17 (e) the Galaxy Tab 10.1 is representative of the Galaxy Tab 7.0; and 18 (f) the Gem and Prevail will be assessed separately. 19 2. If Apple proves that a representative product in sections 1(a) through 1(e) infringes 20 the asserted claim of the ’381 patent, such proof will constitute proof that all the products 21 identified within that particular section infringe the asserted claim. 22 3. If Apple fails to prove that a representative product in sections 1(a) through 1(e) 23 infringes the asserted claim of the ’381 patent, such failure of proof will constitute proof that all 24 the products identified within that particular section do not infringe the asserted claim. 25 26 4. For purposes of assessing infringement of the asserted claim of United States Patent No. 7,864,163: 27 (a) the Galaxy S II (AT&T) is representative of the Acclaim, Captivate, 28 Continuum, Droid Charge, Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy S (i9000), STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL – DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 1 11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG) [Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2 07/21/2012 06:07 AM 1 2 Galaxy S II (i9100), Galaxy S II (T-Mobile), Galaxy S 4G, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 3 4G, Intercept, Mesmerize, Sidekick, Transform, and Vibrant; 4 (b) the Nexus S 4G is representative of the Epic 4G, Galaxy Prevail, Nexus S, and 5 Replenish; and 6 (c) the Galaxy Tab 7.0 and Galaxy Tab 10.1 will be assessed separately. 7 5. If Apple proves that a representative product in sections 4(a) through 4(b) 8 infringes the asserted claim of the ’163 patent, such proof will constitute proof that all the 9 products identified within that particular section infringe the asserted claim. 10 6. If Apple attempts to prove, but fails to prove, that a representative product in 11 sections 4(a) through 4(b) infringes the asserted claim of the ’163 patent, such failure of proof 12 will constitute proof that all the products identified within that particular section do not infringe 13 the asserted claim. 14 7. 15 For purposes of assessing infringement of the asserted claim of United States Patent No. 7,844,915: 16 (a) the Galaxy S II (AT&T) is representative of the Acclaim, Captivate, 17 Continuum, Droid Charge, Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy S (i9000), 18 Galaxy S II (i9100), Galaxy S II (T-Mobile), Galaxy S 4G, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 19 4G, Intercept, Mesmerize, Sidekick, Transform, and Vibrant; 20 (b) the Nexus S 4G is representative of the Epic 4G, Galaxy Prevail, Nexus S, and 21 Replenish; and 22 (c) the Galaxy Tab 7.0 and Galaxy Tab 10.1 will be assessed separately. 23 8. If Apple proves that a representative product in sections 7(a) through 7(b) 24 infringes the asserted claim of the ’915 patent, such proof will constitute proof that all the 25 products identified within that particular section infringe the asserted claim. 26 9. If Apple attempts to prove, but fails to prove, that a representative product in 27 sections 7(a) through 7(b) infringes the asserted claim of the ’915 patent, such failure of proof 28 will constitute proof that all the products identified within that particular section do not infringe the asserted claim. STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL 11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG) [Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2 2 07/21/2012 06:07 AM 1 2 3 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: July 20, 2012 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP By:_______________________________ By:________________________________ CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON VICTORIA F. MAROULIS EDWARD DEFRANCO MICHAEL T. ZELLER 5 6 7 10 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY MICHAEL A. JACOBS JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR ALISON M. TUCHER RICHARD S.J. HUNG JASON R. BARTLETT 11 Attorneys for APPLE INC. 8 9 12 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL 11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG) [Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2 3 07/21/2012 06:07 AM 1 2 ORDER 3 4 Based on the foregoing stipulation, 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 Dated: HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL – DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 1 11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG) [Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2 07/21/2012 06:07 AM 1 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 2 3 4 5 I, Michael A. Jacobs, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Victoria Maroulis has concurred in this filing. 6 7 Dated: July __, 2012 /s/ Michael A. Jacobs 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCTS AT TRIAL 11-cv-01846-LKH (PSG) [Apple/Samsung] Representative Products Utility Patents Stipulation/sf-3173239 v2 2 07/21/2012 06:07 AM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?