Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1312

Declaration of Mark Tung in Support of 1269 ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Kohi> filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 5, # 4 Exhibit 6, # 5 Exhibit 7, # 6 Exhibit 8, # 7 Exhibit 9, # 8 Exhibit 11, # 9 Exhibit 12, # 10 Exhibit 13, # 11 Exhibit 14, # 12 Exhibit 15)(Related document(s) 1296 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/24/2012) Modified on 7/25/2012 (fff, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 8 FILED UNDER SEAL Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION APPLE INC., a California ) corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No: 11-CV-01846-LHK ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, ) a Korean business entity; ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, ) INC., a New York corporation; ) SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS ) AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware ) limited liability company ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________) 13 14 **HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY** 15 16 17 18 DEPOSITION OF JAEGWAN SHIN San Francisco, California Friday, January 27, 2012 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Reported By: LINDA VACCAREZZA, RPR, CLR, CRP, CSR. NO. 10201 JOB NO. 44993 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 800-702-9580 Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 5 1 2 MS. KIM: Foerster for Apple. 3 4 MS. YANG: MR. TUNG: Mark Tung from Quinn 09:32 Emanuel for Samsung. 7 8 Michelle Yang from Samsung. 5 6 Samantha Kim, Morrison THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court reporter please swear in the witness. 9 (Korean Interpreters sworn.) 10 JAEGWAN SHIN, 11 09:32 Having been duly sworn, by the 12 Certified Shorthand Reporter, was 13 examined and testified as follows: 14 15 EXAMINATION BY MR. KREEGER: 09:32 16 Q. Good morning. 17 A. Good morning. 18 Q. We met off the record, but my name 19 is Matthew Kreeger, and I'm an attorney at 20 Morrison Foerster. 21 deposition. 22 full name, please? 23 A. Yes. 24 Q. Mr. Shin, do you understand that 25 We are here to take your 09:32 Could you begin by giving us your My name is Jaegwan Shin. I'm going to ask you a series of questions and TSG Reporting - Worldwide 800-702-9580 09:33 Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 103 1 SAMNDCA00201780, marked for 2 identification.) 3 BY MR. KREEGER: 4 5 Q. Have you seen the document that's been marked as Exhibit 1338 before? 04:03 6 A. I don't recall. 7 Q. Have you seen documents in this 8 format before? 9 MR. TUNG: 10 Objection. THE WITNESS: Vague. This is a very 11 common spreadsheet format documents. 12 Q. 04:04 Mr. Shin, it appears that this 13 spreadsheet lists a series of issues or perhaps 14 bugs with the Galaxy Tab. 15 document like this that lists bugs or issues with 16 Samsung products? 17 18 A. 21 22 23 04:05 Yes, I have seen many documents such as this. 19 20 Have you ever seen a Q. Who generates documents of this type? 04:05 MR. TUNG: Objection. Lacks foundation. THE WITNESS: There is no 24 particular person designated. 25 be done by the QA team or it could be TSG Reporting - Worldwide It could 800-702-9580 04:05 Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 104 1 done by the R&D team. 2 Q. 3 4 Have you personally reported bugs or issues with Samsung products? A. 5 No, I have not. (Exhibit 1339, "Smartphone Feature 6 Report," Bates stamped SAMNDCA00201683 7 through SAMNDCA00201692, marked for 8 04:07 identification.) 9 10 11 BY MR. KREEGER: Q. Have you seen this document 04:07 before, Mr. Shin? 12 A. I don't recall. 13 Q. Do you know whether Samsung has 14 replaced in certain products the bounce effect 15 with a blue glow? 16 04:08 MR. TUNG: Caution the witness not 17 to reveal the substance of any attorney-client 18 communications in his answer. 19 THE WITNESS: 20 "blue glow"? 21 Q. What do you mean by 04:08 Well, has Samsung disabled the 22 bounce effect on any of its products? 23 MR. TUNG: 24 THE WITNESS: 25 Same caution. Some models use the bounce effects, some models don't. TSG Reporting - Worldwide 800-702-9580 So 04:09 Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 105 1 I'm not quite sure as to that. 2 ask me about disabling something? 3 Q. Did you Has anyone in the San Jose lab 4 worked on replacing the bounce effect with some 5 other effect? 6 A. 04:09 If you disable the bounce effect, 7 then you would see the effects which was 8 originally set at Google. 9 might be someone who have worked on this. 10 Q. So I think that there You think there might be someone 11 at San Jose who worked on disabling the bounce 12 effect so that you would see the effect 13 04:11 originally set at Google? 14 A. Yes. 15 Q. And who do you think might have 16 17 18 04:11 worked on that? A. If it is related to the browser, I think it might be Qi Ling. 19 (Exhibit 1340 was marked for 20 identification but withdrawn.) 21 22 23 04:12 BY MR. KREEGER: Q. Have you seen Exhibit 1340? MR. TUNG: Counsel, this is a 24 privileged document. 25 this back. We need to claw 04:12 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 800-702-9580 Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 106 1 MR. KREEGER: 2 MR. TUNG: All right. Did you just mark 3 Exhibit 1340? 4 privileged document. 5 I recognize this as a MR. KREEGER: 6 You don't need to 04:13 look at that. 7 MR. TUNG: 8 So I need to collect the copies of it. 9 MR. KREEGER: I have some marking 10 on this. 11 it, but you can have the others. 12 I'm going to have to destroy MR. TUNG: 13 04:13 I'm not going to take the ones with markings on it. 14 MR. KREEGER: 15 We'll have to destroy this. 04:13 16 (Exhibit 1341, Email from Sangeon 17 Kim dated April 27, 2011, Bates stamped 18 SAMNDCA00202089 through SAMNDCA00202113, 19 marked for identification.) 20 BY MR. KREEGER: 04:14 21 Q. Have you seen Exhibit 1341 before? 22 A. I don't recall. 23 Q. If you turn to the page bearing 24 Bates number that ends in 107, you'll see a 25 table. 04:15 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 800-702-9580

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?