Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1344

Unredacted Apple's Opening Design Patent Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 1089) re 1256 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8, # 2 Exhibit 9, # 3 Exhibit 10, # 4 Exhibit 11)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/25/2012) Modified text on 7/26/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Exhibit 11 (Submitted Under Seal) HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 1 ·1· · · · · · · · · ·UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT · · · · · · · · · ·NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ·2· · · · · · · · · · · · SAN JOSE DIVISION ·3· ·___________________________________ ·4· · · ·5· · · ·6· · · ·7· · · ·8· · · ·9· · · 10· ·APPLE, INC., a California ·Corporation, · · · · Plaintiff, ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Civil Action. No. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 11-CV-01846-LHK ·SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a ·Korean business entity, SAMSUNG ·ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New ·York corporation, and SAMSUNG ·TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, ·a Delaware limited liability ·company, a California corporation. · · · · Defendants. 11 12· · · 13· · · 14· · · 15· · · 16· ·SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a ·Korean business entity, SAMSUNG ·ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New ·York corporation, and SAMSUNG ·TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, ·a Delaware limited liability ·company, a California corporation. · · · · Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, ·vs. 17· · · 18· · · 19 ·APPLE, INC., a California ·corporation, · · · · Counterclaim-Defendant. ·___________________________________ 20· · · · *** HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY *** 21· · · · · · · · VIDEOTAPED PERSONAL DEPOSITION OF: · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·GI-YOUNG LEE 22 23· · · 24· · · 25 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · February 16, 2012 · · ·Kim & Chang ·Daewoo, South Korea 9:17 a.m. - 1:24 p.m. American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia www.americanrealtime.com· (561) 279-9132 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 6 ·1· ·validity of the deposition based on the oaths. ·2· · · · · · · MS. NEILL:· We agree. ·3· · · · · · · VIDEOGRAPHER:· Our court reporter, Melanie ·4· ·Giamarco of American Realtime Court Reporters/Asia will ·5· ·now swear in our interpreters and the witness, and then ·6· ·we can proceed. ·7· · · · · · · (Interpreters sworn.) ·8· · · · · · · · · · · · · GI-YOUNG LEE, ·9· ·after having been duly sworn by the reporter, pursuant 10· ·to stipulation of counsel, was examined and testified 11· ·through the interpreter as follows: 12· · · · · · · MR. ZHANG:· Before we get started, I just 13· ·wanted to state for the record that we requested 14· ·counsel for Samsung to allow Miss Lee to sit for her 15· ·ITC deposition first today on the notice date of that 16· ·deposition, and it was expressed to us that Miss Lee 17· ·was not being offered for her ITC deposition first, and 18· ·that her NDCAL deposition would need to take place 19· ·first. 20· · · · · · · MS. NEILL:· And to be clear, Samsung offered 21· ·Ms. Lee's deposition on -- today for the Northern 22· ·District of California action and for tomorrow in the 23· ·ITC action, and so Samsung requested that the Northern 24· ·District of California deposition proceed first. 25 American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia www.americanrealtime.com· (561) 279-9132 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 31 ·1· · · · ·A.· ·Yes. ·2· · · · ·Q.· ·Do you recall giving an interview about your ·3· ·work on the Galaxy Nexus phone? ·4· · · · ·A.· ·Yes. ·5· · · · ·Q.· ·And does this article correctly capture the ·6· ·statements that you made about the Galaxy Nexus design? ·7· · · · · · · MS. NEILL:· Objection, vague.· Are there any ·8· ·particular statements or all of them related to the ·9· ·article? 10· · · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. ZHANG)· I'm just asking if the 11· ·article is accurate as to the statements that you made? 12· · · · · · · MS. NEILL:· Objection, vague, compound. 13· · · · ·A.· ·It reflects some and not others accurately. 14· · · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. ZHANG)· What was the design 15· ·inspiration for your work on the Galaxy Nexuses? 16· · · · · · · MS. NEILL:· Objection, vague, lacks 17· ·foundation. 18· · · · ·A.· ·Since I did not start participating from the 19· ·very initial design in that regard, I don't think I'm 20· ·in a position to talk about the inspiration. 21· · · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. ZHANG)· Is it true that the Galaxy 22· ·Nexus phone has a front surface that is curved? 23· · · · · · · MS. NEILL:· Objection, vague. 24· · · · ·A.· ·It is true that it is of a curved design. 25· · · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. ZHANG)· What are the benefits of American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia www.americanrealtime.com· (561) 279-9132 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 32 ·1· ·having a curved front surface on a phone? ·2· · · · · · · MS. NEILL:· Objection, lacks foundation, ·3· ·vague, compound. ·4· · · · ·A.· ·In my view, because a human face has a ·5· ·curved feature, I would think, because of that, the ·6· ·contact between the phone against the surface of the ·7· ·human face will be smoother, easier. ·8· · · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. ZHANG)· Are there any other ·9· ·benefits? 10· · · · · · · MS. NEILL:· Objection, lacks foundation, 11· ·vague. 12· · · · ·A.· ·I would think there would certainly be other 13· ·benefits than that, but I can't come up with any others 14· ·at the moment. 15· · · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. ZHANG)· Do you believe that the 16· ·curved front surface design is more beautiful than a 17· ·flat front surface design? 18· · · · · · · MS. NEILL:· Objection, vague. 19· · · · ·A.· ·I think that would vary depending on the 20· ·design. 21· · · · ·Q.· ·(By MR. ZHANG)· Are there any downsides to 22· ·having a curved front surface to a phone? 23· · · · · · · MS. NEILL:· Objection, vague. 24· · · · ·A.· ·I haven't given that a thought, 25· ·particularly. American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia www.americanrealtime.com· (561) 279-9132 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 62 ·1· · · · · · · · · · · C E R T I F I C A T E ·2· ·DAEWOO· · · · · ·) · · · · · · · · · · · ) ·3· ·SOUTH KOREA· · · ) ·4· · · ·5· · · ·6· · · ·7· · · ·8 · · ·9· · · 10· · · · · · · I, Melanie L. Giamarco, Registered ·Professional Reporter and Certified Realtime Reporter, ·do hereby certify that the aforementioned witness was ·first duly sworn by me pursuant to stipulation of ·counsel to testify to the truth; that I was authorized ·to and did report said deposition in stenotype; and ·that the foregoing pages are a true and correct ·transcription of my shorthand notes of said deposition. 11· · · 12· · · 13· · · · · · · I further certify that I am not attorney or ·counsel of any of the parties, nor am I a relative or ·employee of any attorney or counsel of any party ·connected with the action, nor am I financially ·interested in the action. 14· · · 15· · · 16 · · · · · · The foregoing certification of this ·transcript does not apply to any reproduction of the ·same by any means unless under the direct control ·and/or direction of the certifying reporter. · · · · · · I further certify that said deposition was ·taken at the time and place hereinabove set forth and ·that the taking of said deposition was commenced and ·completed as hereinabove set out. 17 · · · · · · · · IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my 18· ·hand this 18th day of February, 2012. 19 20· · · 21· · · 22· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ___________________________ ·Melanie L. Giamarco ·Certified Realtime Reporter ·Registered Professional Reporter ·Certified Shorthand Reporter 23 24 25 American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia www.americanrealtime.com· (561) 279-9132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?