Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 179

Declaration of SARA JENKINS IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S OPPOSITION TO APPLE'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W, #24 Exhibit X, #25 Exhibit Y, #26 Exhibit Z, #27 Exhibit AA, #28 Exhibit BB, #29 Exhibit CC, #30 Exhibit DD, #31 Exhibit EE, #32 Exhibit FF, #33 Exhibit GG, #34 Exhibit HH, #35 Exhibit II, #36 Exhibit JJ, #37 Exhibit KK, #38 Exhibit LL, #39 Exhibit MM, #40 Exhibit NN, #41 Exhibit OO, #42 Exhibit PP, #43 Exhibit QQ, #44 Exhibit RR, #45 Exhibit SS, #46 Exhibit TT)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 8/23/2011) Modified on 8/29/2011 cannot link entry-opposition has not been efiled (dhm, COURT STAFF).

EXHIBIT T

iPad compared to D’889 and to Galaxy Tab 10.1 (screen)

iPad2 compared to D’889 and to Galaxy Tab 10.1 (screen)

D’889 compared to iPad and Galaxy Tab 10.1
D’889 claimed design:
g

D’889 claimed design 
superimposed on iPad:

D’889 claimed design 
superimposed on Galaxy Tab 10.1:

Ornamentation on iPads and Galaxy Tab 10.1
D’889

No ornamentation except an
p
optional round area on upper left
edge and optional rectangular
area on center lower edge
(from back view)

iPad

iPad2

Galaxy
Tab 10.1

be e s
bezel is
separate
piece

Profile comparison of D’889, iPads, and Galaxy Tab 10.1