Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 658

First MOTION for Leave to Supplement Its Infringement Contentions filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Leave to Amend)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/25/2012) Modified text on 1/26/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129 kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor  Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 (650) 801-5000  Telephone: Facsimile: (650) 801-5100   Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417) michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017  Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100   Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,  INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION   APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK  DECLARATION OF TODD BRIGGS IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS  Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendant.   02198.51855/4565923.4  Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK BRIGGS DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS ________ 1 I, Todd M. Briggs, declare:  1. I am a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, counsel for Samsung  Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications  America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). I am licensed to practice law in the State of California.  I submit this declaration in support of Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement  Contentions. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and, if called  upon as a witness, I could and would testify to the following facts.  2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and accurate copy of the cover pleading for  Samsung’s Infringement Contentions.  3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and accurate copy of Apple’s press release  announcing the iPhone 4S, downloaded January 24, 2012, from  http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2011/10/04Apple-Launches-iPhone-4S-iOS-5-iCloud.html.  4. Samsung began investigating the iPhone 4S immediately after the product was  launched.  5. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and accurate copy of correspondence from  counsel for Apple, received November 9, 2011.  6. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and accurate copy of correspondence to  counsel for Apple, sent November 22, 2011.  7. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and accurate copy of correspondence from  counsel for Apple, received November 30, 2011.  8. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and accurate copy of correspondence to  counsel for Apple, sent December 5, 2011.  9. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and accurate copy of correspondence from  counsel for Apple, received December 14, 2011.  10. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and accurate copy of correspondence to  counsel for Apple, sent December 22, 2011.    Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK BRIGGS DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 1 1 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and accurate copy of correspondence to 2 counsel for Apple, sent December 29 and 30, 2011. 3 12. On December 30 , 2011, I spoke with Mark Selwyn, counsel for Apple, by 4 teleconference. During that teleconference Mr. Selwyn asked Samsung to prepare a draft 5 supplemental infringement contention charts. Mr. Selwyn further stated Apple sought to assert its 6 patents in suit against the Samsung products raised in Apple’s letter of November 9 (Exhibit C to 7 this declaration). 8 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and accurate copy of correspondence to 9 counsel for Apple, sent January 4, 2012. Sub-exhibits J-2, J-3, and J-4 reflect draft supplement 10 infringement contentions. On Exhibit J-4, the only substantive change is reflected on pages 1 and 11 2. 12 14. On January 4, 2012, I spoke with Mr. Selwyn by teleconference. During the 13 teleconference, Mr. Selwyn represented Samsung’s draft supplemental infringement contentions 14 were acceptable. Mr. Selwyn further stated he would send Samsung a draft stipulation by the end 15 of the week.. 16 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and accurate copy of correspondence from 17 counsel for Apple, received January 6, 2012. 18 16. Apple’s proposed stipulation (Exhibit K to this declaration ) contained 13 Samsung 19 products that Apple did not raise prior to January 6, 2012. 20 17. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and accurate copy of correspondence to 21 counsel for Apple, sent January 10 and 18, 2012. 22 18. Attached hereto as Exhibit M is a true and accurate copy of correspondence to 23 counsel for Apple, sent January 20, 2012. 24 19. On January 20, 2012, I spoke with counsel for Apple , seeking Apple’s position on 25 the thirteen, previously unidentified products. 26 20. On January 21, 2012, Mr. Selwyn left a voice message stating that Apple’s final 27 position was reflected in the draft stipulation, received on January 6, 2012. 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK BRIGGS DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 2 1 2 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in 3 Redwood Shores, California on January 24, 2012. 4 /s/ Todd Briggs 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK BRIGGS DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 3 1 2 General Order Attestation I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that Todd M. Briggs has 4 concurred in this filing. 5 /s/ Victoria Maroulis 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK BRIGGS DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?