Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 658

First MOTION for Leave to Supplement Its Infringement Contentions filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Leave to Amend)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/25/2012) Modified text on 1/26/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

EXHIBIT K

Todd Briggs
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Selwyn, Mark [[e-mail]]
Friday, January 06, 2012 8:12 PM
Todd Briggs
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Kolovos, Peter
Apple v. Samsung -- Draft Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Adding Accused
Products
Stipulation and Proposed Order re Adding Accused Products - 4.DOC

Todd: 

Per our discussion, for your review. 

Mark 

1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13

APPLE INC.,

14
15
16
17
18

Case No.
Plaintiff,

v.

11-cv-01846-LHK

STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING ADDING
ACCUSED PRODUCTS

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company.,

19
Defendants.
20
21
22

Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung

23

Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively,

24

“Samsung”), stipulate as follows:

25

On August 26, 2011, Apple served its Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement

26

Contentions, as well as an addendum thereto, in accordance with Patent Local Rule 3-1. On the

27

same day, Samsung served its Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions, also

28

in accordance with Patent Local Rule 3-1.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADDING ACCUSED PRODUCTS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3069416

1

1

Since then, both Apple and Samsung have released new products.

2

The parties agree that Apple may add as Accused Instrumentalities in this action, without

3

adding patents-in-suit or asserting infringement of any claims of the patents-in suit that were not

4

asserted in Apple’s initial Infringement Contentions, the following Samsung Products:

5

Galaxy Nexus

Galaxy Player 4.0

Galaxy Player 5.0

Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus

6

Galaxy Tab 8.9

Galaxy S II Epic 4G

Galaxy S II Skyrocket

Admire

7

Touch

8

Captivate Glide

Conquer 4G

Dart

Exhibit II 4G

9

Focus S

Gravity Smart

Illusion

Showcase i500

Stratosphere

Transform Ultra

10
11

Apple shall serve Amended Supplemental Infringement Contentions under Patent Local

12

Rule 3-1 for these additional Accused Instrumentalities within five days of the Court’s entry of an

13

Order implementing this Stipulation. Samsung shall comply with Patent Local Rule 3-4(a) with

14

respect to these additional Accused Instrumentalities within ten days of Apple’s service of its

15

Supplemental Infringement Contentions.

16

The parties agree that Samsung may add as an Accused Instrumentality in this action,

17

without adding patents-in-suit or asserting infringement of any claims of the patents-in suit that

18

were not asserted in Samsung’s initial Infringement Contentions, the Apple iPhone 4S.

19

Samsung shall serve Amended Supplemental Infringement Contentions under Patent

20

Local Rule 3-1 for this additional Accused Instrumentality within five days of the Court’s entry of

21

an Order implementing this Stipulation. Apple shall comply with Patent Local Rule 3-4(a) with

22

respect to this additional Accused Instrumentality within ten days of Samsung’s service of its

23

Supplemental Infringement Contentions.

24

The addition of these Accused Instrumentalities does not constitute grounds for

25

Supplemental Invalidity Contentions under Patent Local Rule 3-3, or the addition of proposed

26

terms for construction.

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADDING ACCUSED PRODUCTS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3069416

2

1

The service of the aforementioned Supplemental Infringement Contentions shall not affect

2

the total number of claim terms to be construed and shall not change any dates or discovery

3

limitations set forth in the Court’s previous Orders.

4

So Stipulated:

5

Dated: January _____, 2012

Dated January _____, 2012

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

By:_____________________________
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
ALISON M. TUCHER
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
JASON R. BARTLETT

By:________________________________
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
EDWARD DEFRANCO
MICHAEL T. ZELLER

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

15

Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC.

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19
20

Dated: ___________________, 2012

By:

21
22

Honorable Lucy H. Koh

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADDING ACCUSED PRODUCTS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3069416

3