Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 658

First MOTION for Leave to Supplement Its Infringement Contentions filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Leave to Amend)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/25/2012) Modified text on 1/26/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT G December 14, 2011 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Victoria Maroulis, Esq. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065 Re: Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al., Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (N.D. Cal.) Dear Victoria: We write in response to your December 5 letter regarding proposed reciprocal stipulations to amend the parties’ infringement contentions. Your letter, which was sent in response to my November 30, 2011 letter, does not answer the questions I asked. While you say that “Samsung believes that the contentions under Local P.R. 3-1 need to be amended for each added product,” you do not explain in what respect(s) Samsung seeks to amend its infringement contentions. We understand that Samsung wants to amend its contentions to identify the iPhone 4S as an accused product. My question was whether Samsung seeks to amend any other aspect of its contentions. Accordingly, I ask again that you please let us know as soon as possible whether Samsung seeks to modify in any way its disclosures and contentions set forth on September 7, 2011 pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-1(a), (c)-(h), or, on the other hand, whether Samsung will commit in this case to the identical infringement theories for the iPhone 4S as those set forth against the Apple products previously identified. Finally, in response to your question of how Apple intends to proceed, as noted in the proposed stipulation that we circulated on November 9, Apple plans to proceed under our previously disclosed theories with respect to the additional Samsung products. Yours very truly, /s/ Samuel J. Maselli Samuel J. Maselli cc: Counsel of Record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?