Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
671
EXHIBITS re #667 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions (Baxter Declaration in Support of Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions) filed bySamsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W, #24 Exhibit X)(Related document(s) #667 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/27/2012)
EXHIBIT E
quinn emanuel
trial lawyers | silicon valley
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 | TEL: (650) 801-5000 FAX: (650) 801-5100
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NO.
(650) 801-5022
November 22, 2011
WRITER'S INTERNET ADDRESS
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
VIA E-MAIL
Richard Hung
Morrison & Foerster LLP
425 Market St.
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
Re:
Apple v. Samsung Electronics, et al., No. 5:11-cv-01846-LHK (N.D. Cal.)
Dear Rich:
I write regarding Apple’s November 9 proposed stipulation adding several Samsung products to
the litigation, namely the Galaxy Tab 8.9, Galaxy Tab 7.0, Galaxy Player 4.0, Galaxy Player 5.0,
and Galaxy S II Skyrocket. Samsung has considered Apple’s proposal and will join the
stipulation so long as Apple will stipulate to Samsung’s adding the iPhone 4S to the action.
Please let us know if Apple will accept this compromise.
On a separate note, please let us know as soon as practicable whether Apple will stipulate to
Samsung’s serving supplemental invalidity contentions under Patent Local Rule 3-6. On
November 10, 2011, Jason Bartlett was sent a letter from Marissa Ducca describing several
supplemental invalidity contentions regarding prior art discovered through the recent depositions
of Apple’s inventors. In particular, Samsung would like to supplement its contentions for the
’891, ’002, ’828, ’163, and ’129 patents. The letter from Ms. Ducca provides the details of these
contentions as well as ample reasons why Apple would not be unduly prejudiced by them.
Sincerely,
/s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
Victoria F. Maroulis
quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp
LOS ANGELES | 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 | TEL (213) 443-3000 FAX (213) 443-3100
NEW YORK | 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10010-1601 | TEL (212) 849-7000 FAX (212) 849-7100
SAN FRANCISCO | 50 California Street, 22nd Floor, San Francisco, California 94111-4788 | TEL (415) 875-6600 FAX (415) 875-6700
CHICAGO | 500 W. Madison Street, Suite 2450, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2510 | TEL (312) 705-7400 FAX (312) 705-7401
WASHINGTON, DC | 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 6th Floor, Washington, District of Columbia 20004-2544 | TEL (202) 756-1950 FAX (202) 756-1951
LONDON | 16 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7EG, United Kingdom | TEL +44(0) 20 7653 2000 FAX +44(0) 20 7653 2100
TOKYO | NBF Hibiya Bldg., 25F, 1-1-7, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0011, Japan | TEL +81 3 5510 1711 FAX +81 3 5510 1712
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?