Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 754

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Hankil Kang In Support of Samsung's Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #2 Exhibit 1 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Samsung's Motion for a Protective Order, #3 Exhibit 2 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Samuel Lee Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #4 Exhibit 3 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Gee Sung Choi Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #5 Exhibit 4 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Jong Kyun Shin Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #6 Exhibit 5 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] WonPyo Hong Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #7 Exhibit 6 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Heonbae Kim Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #8 Exhibit 7 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Seunghwan Cho Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #9 Exhibit 8 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Dong Jin Koh Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #10 Exhibit 9 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Dale Sohn Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #11 Exhibit 10 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Joseph Cheong Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #12 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #13 Exhibit A to Kassabian Declaration, #14 Exhibit B to Kassabian Declaration, #15 Exhibit C to Kassabian Declaration, #16 Exhibit D to Kassabian Declaration, #17 Exhibit E to Kassabian Declaration, #18 Exhibit F to Kassabian Declaration, #19 Exhibit G to Kassabian Declaration, #20 Exhibit H to Kassabian Declaration, #21 Exhibit I to Kassabian Declaration, #22 Exhibit J to Kassabian Declaration, #23 Exhibit K to Kassabian Declaration, #24 Exhibit L to Kassabian Declaration, #25 Exhibit M to Kassabian Declaration, #26 Exhibit N to Kassabian Declaration, #27 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #28 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion for a Protective Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 2/23/2012)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com  555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065  Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100  Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)  michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000  Facsimile: (213) 443-3100  Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS  AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION  APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK  SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL  Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendants.     Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Defendants Samsung 2 Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications 3 America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) hereby bring this administrative motion for an order to 4 seal: 5 1. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung’s Motion for a Protective Order 6 Precluding the Depositions of Ten High-Ranking Samsung Executives; and 7 2. Exhibits A, B, and E to M to the Declaration of Rachel Kassabian in Support of 8 Samsung’s Motion for a Protective Order Precluding the Depositions of Ten High- 9 Ranking Samsung Executives. 10 3. The Declarations of Gee Sung Choi, Jong Hyun Shin, Dale Sohn, Joseph Cheong, 11 Seunghwan Cho, WonPyo Hong, Heonbae Kim, Jaewan Chi in Support of 12 Samsung’s Motion for a Protective Order Precluding the Depositions of Ten High- 13 Ranking Samsung Executives. 14 4. The Declaration of Samuel Lee in Support of Samsung’s Motion for a Protective 15 Order Precluding the Depositions of Ten High-Ranking Samsung Executives. 16 Samsung has established good cause to permit filing these documents under seal through 17 the Declaration of Hankil Kang in Support of Samsung’s Administrative Motion to File 18 Documents Under Seal, filed herewith. In short, the above documents discuss, refer to, or 19 comprise excerpts of depositions that Samsung has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 20 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY under the protective order, or are declarations describing the duties 21 of high-ranking executives and the confidential business structure and practices of Samsung. 22 Pursuant to General Order No. 62, Samsung’s entire filing will be lodged with the Court 23 for in camera review and served on all parties. A proposed redacted version of Samsung’s 24 Motion for a Protective Order Precluding the Depositions of Ten High-Ranking Samsung 25 Executives is attached as Exhibit 1 to this motion. 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL -1- 1 DATED: February 23, 2012 2 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 3 4 5 6 7 8 By /s/ Victoria Maroulis Charles K. Verhoeven Kevin P.B. Johnson Victoria F. Maroulis Michael T. Zeller Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?