Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 754

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Hankil Kang In Support of Samsung's Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #2 Exhibit 1 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Samsung's Motion for a Protective Order, #3 Exhibit 2 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Samuel Lee Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #4 Exhibit 3 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Gee Sung Choi Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #5 Exhibit 4 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Jong Kyun Shin Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #6 Exhibit 5 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] WonPyo Hong Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #7 Exhibit 6 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Heonbae Kim Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #8 Exhibit 7 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Seunghwan Cho Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #9 Exhibit 8 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Dong Jin Koh Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #10 Exhibit 9 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Dale Sohn Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #11 Exhibit 10 to Kang Decl.: [REDACTED] Joseph Cheong Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #12 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian ISO Samsung's Motion for Protective Order, #13 Exhibit A to Kassabian Declaration, #14 Exhibit B to Kassabian Declaration, #15 Exhibit C to Kassabian Declaration, #16 Exhibit D to Kassabian Declaration, #17 Exhibit E to Kassabian Declaration, #18 Exhibit F to Kassabian Declaration, #19 Exhibit G to Kassabian Declaration, #20 Exhibit H to Kassabian Declaration, #21 Exhibit I to Kassabian Declaration, #22 Exhibit J to Kassabian Declaration, #23 Exhibit K to Kassabian Declaration, #24 Exhibit L to Kassabian Declaration, #25 Exhibit M to Kassabian Declaration, #26 Exhibit N to Kassabian Declaration, #27 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #28 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion for a Protective Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 2/23/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT D From:                                         Rachel Herrick Kassabian  Sent:                                           Monday, February 20, 2012 11:00 AM  To:                                               'Mazza, Mia'  Cc:                                               'AppleMoFo'; Samsung v. Apple  Subject:                                     Apple depositions  Attachments:                          RE: Apple v. Samsung:  Discovery Correspondence ‐ Samsung's Purported Apex  Objections     Mia,     As Judge Grewal has ordered, we’d like to explore whether the parties can narrow or resolve the apex  deposition issue – through compromise, “horse‐trading,” or other means.  To that end, by 5pm today, can you  please provide us with the following information:     1. Answers to the questions that I posed in my prior email (attached) and at the lead counsel meet and  confer regarding (a) whether Apple has any evidence that these apex witnesses possess *unique*  knowledge, and (b) whether Apple is willing to propose dropping or limiting any of these apex  depositions.   Apple’s filed motion does not answer either of these questions, and Apple has refused to  answer them during prior meet and confer discussions, so we’d like answers today.     2. Advise whether Apple will be objecting on apex grounds to the noticed depositions of any Apple  witnesses.     Once we have this information, I would like to set up a call with you to discuss whether any progress or  compromise can be reached.     Regards,  Rachel     Rachel Herrick Kassabian | Partner   Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor  Redwood Shores, CA 94065  650.801.5005 Direct 650.801.5000 Main 650.801.5100 Fax rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com www.quinnemanuel.com  NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.        

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?