Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 887

Declaration of Mia Mazza In Support Of Apples Administrative Motion For Clarification Regarding April 12 Order filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24)(Tucher, Alison) (Filed on 4/26/2012)

Exhibit 19

Apple v. Samsung: Correspondence to Counsel for Motorola re April 12 Order

From:

Diane Hutnyan [[e-mail]]

Sent:

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:56 PM

To:

Mazza, Mia

Cc:

AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; [e-mail]

Subject:

Page 1 of 2

FW: Apple v. Samsung: Correspondence to Counsel for Motorola re April 12 Order

Attachments: 2012-04-25 Ltr Mazza to Hutnyan re Motorola.pdf

Mia, I do not do any work for Motorola or any of the other third‐party entities at issue.  As I informed 
you in one of yesterday’s letters, you will need to contact others if you have questions about the scope 
of these consents.

Please contact Pete Chassman at Winston & Strawn regarding any questions about Motorola’s consent.  

From: Mazza, Mia [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:08 PM
To: Diane Hutnyan
Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service
Subject: Apple v. Samsung: Correspondence to Counsel for Motorola re April 12 Order

<<2012-04-25 Ltr Mazza to Hutnyan re Motorola.pdf>>
Hi Diane,
Attached please find correspondence sent to you in your capacity as Motorola’s lawyer to clarify, if any
clarification is needed, that the confidential information Apple seeks consent to produce to Samsung
under the Court's April 12 Order is all Motorola confidential information contained in the court files in
Certain Mobile Devices And Related Software (Apple v. Motorola), ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-750 and Apple
Inc. v. Motorola Inc. et al., No. 11-cv-08540 (D. Ill.) (formerly Apple Inc. v. Motorola Inc. et al., No. 10-cv00662 (W.D. Wis.)).
Regards,
Mia Mazza
Morrison & Foerster LLP
San Francisco
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
[phone] fax

--------------------------------------------------------------------To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Morrison & Foerster LLP informs
you that, if any advice concerning one or more U.S. Federal tax issues is contained in this
communication (including any attachments), such advice is not intended or written to be used,
and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or
(ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed
herein.

Apple v. Samsung: Correspondence to Counsel for Motorola re April 12 Order

Page 2 of 2

For information about this legend, go to
http://www.mofo.com/Circular230/
============================================================================
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the
addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the
message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------